• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

How is the 5900-series any lower quality a gun than the CZ75,P226, M9,GP35,etc?

Mark IV

Mark IV

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
592
Reaction score
425
Location
Georgia
As the title indicates, I'm wondering how the gen 3 S&W's like the hi-cap, alloy framed 5903's or the steel framed 5906's, are substantively inferior to their very similar and popular counterparts, like the CZ75, SigSauer P226, Beretta 92/M9, Browning Hi-power, etc.
These other pistols all enjoy a certain "panache", in the minds of many, and a correspondingly higher monetary "value", that the Smiths simply do not, though they seem to match up virtually identically in most observable,relevant criteria.
Having owned everything listed, but the Hi-power, I can't identify any definable reason that the S&W 5900's should be any less desirable than these others, were we to objectively compare their attributes and functionality.
I think the S&W's are a victim of numerous biases,preconceptions, and prejudices that cause many to turn a blind eye to the stellar performance of these American-made work-horses, largely due to them not having an "Old World" pedigree.
Where am i going wrong here?
 
I have had a number of 3rd gen autos and a few 2nd gen. Right now I have a CZ75 SP01 and a fixed sight 5906. The CZ is more accurate, more "shootable", and has better da\sa trigger pulls. It is also easier to take down.

U.S. made police and military contract Berettas were very similar to 3rd Gens in quality, fit, and finish. Italian made commercial guns seemed nicer.
 
For a short period of time 3G Smiths were the Model 10s of their time......every cop had one......... bumped by the Glock 17/19

CZ75...... were banned from import till what ......1990/92... Col Cooper sung their praises......................

Sig 226 more expensive.......................gun of the "SEAL's"....... what could be coooooler!!!!!

Browning HPs...... more expensive ..... harder to come by around here........the gun of ....... "Serpico" ...and the British SAS.........two thumbs up!!!!!!!

Beretta 92's.....Got more "Movie roles"..... Lethal Weapon, Die Hard.... so way coooooler than any Smith........short of a 6 1/2" Model 29!!!!!!!!!

The ASP made it into the James Bond books....... but never got the casting call for the Bond movies....... or the 3913/14 would be the PPK of the 21st Century..........





In the good old USA ........ it's all about ........MARKETING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:D
 
Last edited:
Mark IV said:
Where am i going wrong here?
Click to expand...
Not having been around and wide awake during the years when 3rd Gens were shiny brand new in dealer display cases, I can't give you an apples-to-apples comparison of 3rd Gens to the similar all-metal pistols of the day. Today, the comparison must almost always be made between used 3rd Gens (some of them very used) and competing all-metal pistols that are still available brand spanking new.

Of course the brand spanking new all-metal pistols are going to cost more than used 3rd Gens. Of course their "value" is going to be higher just due to simple market forces and buyer preferences. Team 3rd Gen member preferences notwithstanding, not everyone else out there wants to buy a used all-metal gun with all the baggage that goes along with older, unsupported guns... especially when fully-warrantied modern plastic is so damn cheap! ;)

That said, I recently had an opportunity to pick-up a brand new Sig P226 at a very attractive price and terms. As much as I like the gun (and all the "cool" status that goes along with owning a Sig), I couldn't bring myself to do it. I got this close to doing the deal... but then I started to think about the fact that my "slightly used" 3rd Gens are every bit as good as the P226 at half the price. :) Suddenly, the Sig P226 didn't seem like such a good deal after all! ;)

The Browning Hi-Power is another matter. They aren't available new in my loony moonbat state so the "value" here is through the roof just due to that fact. Same with the CZ pistols. :o The extreme scarcity factor (due to our "lists") can have a huge effect. :(

The Beretta 92FS *is* widely available here and used ones are very comparable in price/value to used 3rd Gens. It's about as close a comparison I can think of off the top of my head. :)
 
The 5906 is HEAVY compared to those others. All stainless will do that. Functionally I'd put it up with the Beretta 92 though the grip on the S&W is better (for me at least). I found my 5906 to be tall (high profile) and simply heavier than it needed to be for 9mm. I like a friend's 6904 much better.

The SIG and the CZ75 are just better designs IMO. Easy to take down, accurate, as good as DA/SA triggers can get.
 
GatorFarmer said:
I have had a number of 3rd gen autos and a few 2nd gen. Right now I have a CZ75 SP01 and a fixed sight 5906. The CZ is more accurate, more "shootable", and has better da\sa trigger pulls. It is also easier to take down.

U.S. made police and military contract Berettas were very similar to 3rd Gens in quality, fit, and finish. Italian made commercial guns seemed nicer.
Click to expand...

"Accuracy" is in the hands of the shooter. While I can't comment on the trigger of your CZ I'll concede that the triggers on my Smith autos aren't the top of the line but are consistent and shootable. I can keep up with most using my 6904 but I like the gun and have shot it regularly. Anyone who bests me has better skills but not a better gun. Take down and design is what it is...

To the op's question my response would be that a "good" auto feeds, fires and ejects and earns the trust of the shooter. I trust my 3rd gens 100% and carry them. Will the op like them? Personal opinion but they have lots of fans.
 
To address several of the points previously brought up:
Any perceived difference in accuracy is largely irrelevant, as ALL these guns are more than "combat accurate", exactly as they were intended to be. None of them were designed, nor have any need, to hit Coke cans at 50 yards.
The same goes for trigger pulls. None of these were designed or intended as finely-tuned target pistols with hair triggers.
Go to any other gun forum, and look at posts on any of these pistols, and you'll hear repeated references on how a "good gunsmith can fix that stock trigger".
Also, the comments about ease of take-down (aka, "field stripping") are largely nonsense. NONE of them are remotely difficult to field strip, so whether one is a tiny fraction easier or harder to field strip than another is completely irrelevant.
What I'm wondering here is, is there any discernable,substantive,quantifiable way that these other renowned pistols are significantly,provably superior to the gen3 Smiths in reliablitiy,longevity,accuracy, and any other way that you would judge a combat pistol ?
I'm gonna go ahead and say, "no", they ain't. :eek:
 
Last edited:
"As the title indicates, I'm wondering how the gen 3 S&W's like the hi-cap, alloy framed 5903's or the steel framed 5906's, are substantively inferior to their very similar and popular counterparts, like the CZ75, SigSauer P226, Beretta 92/M9, Browning Hi-power, etc."

It isn't...
 
Last edited:
SPEEDGUNNER said:
It isn't...
Last edited by SPEEDGUNNER; Today at 07:43 PM.
Click to expand...

LOL !! I don't mean to bust on you, bro, but this cracked me up! Did you really have to come back and edit, "it isn't"? :D
(and since you were in the neighborhood, I'm thinking you shoulda made it, "they aren't" ;))
 
S&W 3rd gens are the equal of SIGs and Berettas in fit and finish. They're nicer finished than CZs (my new SP01 Tactical has machining marks and an inconsistent painted finish on internals, which CZ acknowledges is common since it's mostly there for cosmetics). I think the CZs are the most ergonomic by far, but S&Ws have excellent triggers - better than a stock CZ or Beretta, equal to a standard SIG, and only slightly inferior to a SRT SIG.

The biggest issue I have with the S&Ws is that they're kind of dated. The other makes have had constant improvement in ergonomics over the past thirty years. With the S&Ws dead, they've missed out on some of the newer trends in grip design, decocker location and operation, and accessory rail options.

I think a warmed over 4th generation with an optional accessory rail, tweaked grip and beavertail profile, and xx26/76-like decocker would give SIG and CZ a run for their money and beat Beretta by a mile, but S&W has lost interest in the market. It's sad, but that's how it goes. For the record, I'm a CZ fan until S&W gets it's act together.
 
If we take the Beretta 92, the CZ-75, the Browning Hi-Power and the Sig P226 and pit all of those against the S&W 3rd Gen 9mm pistols, two quick things jump out at me as obvious differences that could certainly affect their popularity:

1) all of "the other guys" are in production and are (likely) to have better manufacturer support in both parts and service

2) all of "the other guys" have had or still do have very high profile military contract and the notoriety that always follows such contracts

To a lesser degree but still something I notice most often when someone cites a reason for NOT choosing a 3rd Gen includes two heavy hitters... the magazine disconnect safety and a thumb safety that many claim "backwards" because they loathe "up to fire". Admittedly, the Beretta suffers here also.

Does any of this make a 3rd Gen inferior? I don't think so, but many folks (especially when discussed OUTSIDE of a S&W forum) often do.
 
9 MMs that will go cocked and locked are easier to score higher with in matches. The double action category in most matches allows Glocks and Springfield XDs which are easier to make the first shot with. Avoiding the first shot double action also makes it is easier to teach recruits to master striker fired pistols. The relatively low prices on 5900 series pistols is a consequence of their former wide spread acceptance. Too many were sold as police surplus for them to command much of a price while traditional DA/SA pistols are fading into obsolescence.

That's not to imply that I do not like them, but I already have more than I need so there's no profit to be made bring them back for me.
 
Last edited:
You know what I really like about my Smiths, THE short and crisp trigger reset. Not sure how the others are, but would be interested to know. If they weren't comparable, that would be a turn off for me.
 
Aren't they all still in production?

3rd gennies are no longer produced.

But that because there's no market for metal fr............

Oh never mind.....
 
Having owned all of those guns I can confidently say that we are splitting hairs if we say one gun is of better quality than the other. All of them the OP listed are very good in every way, especially the Hi Power and 5906. I have fired different 5906's tens of thousands of rounds and it will beat any other gun I have owned in terms of reliability, even the Hi Power. The gun will feed any ammo. It is that single trait, I feel, that makes the 3rd gen guns the best. Nothing is more important in a service gun than reliability. I have a 5906 that has fired about 50000 rounds and was abused by firing 1600 to 2000 rounds that were accidentally re-loaded to 120% and that gun is still in perfect working order. As far as re-sale value, some 3rd gens such as the 5906 and 5903 were issued in far greater numbers to Law Enforcement oner the last 30 years than those other guns you listed. So there-in-lies the reason for lower prices on those guns. The OP stated that the 3rd gens do not have the "Panache" of the other guns. I think that is a function of who we associate with and what guns they are fans of. Of course the HI Power reigns supreme in history and it should because it has been around since 1935 and it is well deserved. But I have said it here before and it is worth saying again: If somebody says there is a better 9mm gun than the 5906 they just don't know what they are talking about.
 
Mark IV said:
I'm wondering how the gen 3 S&W's like the hi-cap, alloy framed 5903's or the steel framed 5906's, are substantively inferior to their very similar and popular counterparts, like the CZ75, SigSauer P226, Beretta 92/M9, Browning Hi-power, etc.
Click to expand...


Someone's been telling you lies.

I'm sure the pistols listed above are all fine examples, but the 3rd Gens "inferior" I don't see it.
 
I'm new to 3rd Gen S&W pistols, but have "competed" with and carried a CZ 75BD and P-01. The CZs are fun and easy to work on, tweaking springs and hammers.

I also had and liked a Beretta PX4 (decocker only).

I mostly stayed away from the S&W due to the safety lever, afraid I would inadvertently place it on safe.

Having just purchased a 3913, I am now a big fan. I'm having to get used to the different trigger pull (assuming it's the mag disconnect). Though the trigger on my 3913 measures over 12# DA and 7# SA, I like it. And won't change it. I like that the reset and SA travel is short but is definite and distinct when it breaks.

My CZ 75BD has a 7# DA and 4# SA. I'm sure I'll shoot it better in IDPA right now. But I'm going to search for a 5903 and practice with it for IDPA. Should be fun.

Best of all, when I break down my 3913 (by the way, I don't find it hard. I'm not sure what the complaints are about), I am SO IMPRESSED with the finish and quality of the internals and the way the barrel locks up.
 
GatorFarmer said:
I have had a number of 3rd gen autos and a few 2nd gen. Right now I have a CZ75 SP01 and a fixed sight 5906. The CZ is more accurate, more "shootable", and has better da\sa trigger pulls. It is also easier to take down.

U.S. made police and military contract Berettas were very similar to 3rd Gens in quality, fit, and finish. Italian made commercial guns seemed nicer.
Click to expand...

When I bought my 92FS I compared a US built to an Italian built side by side and found absolutely no difference. I ended up taking the US built because it was a police model that came with an extra 15 round mag. The fit and finish were identical.
 
Florida J Frame said:
When I bought my 92FS I compared a US built to an Italian built side by side and found absolutely no difference. I ended up taking the US built because it was a police model that came with an extra 15 round mag. The fit and finish were identical.
Click to expand...

FYI for some years Beretta had 92/96s that would have a "P" on the box (not plastic cases but throw away boxes) and generally came with 3 mags......the finish wasn't quit up to commercial guns and they seemed to be guns intended for fulling police orders...................
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top