Grip comparison 645 vs 1911

josywales

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
438
Reaction score
358
I had a 645 long ago. It's in the top 10 of guns I wish I'd kept, although my recent hankering is for the adjustable sight model. Anyway, when I had the 645, I did not have a 1911. So I'm curious, aside from grip angle, is the 645 grip thicker and/or longer (from the palm to the fingers) than the 1911? I like the 1911, but it's nearly my size limit. I really like the CZ97, but the grip is just a tad too large.

Thoughts?
 
Register to hide this ad
I had a 645 long ago. It's in the top 10 of guns I wish I'd kept, although my recent hankering is for the adjustable sight model. Anyway, when I had the 645, I did not have a 1911. So I'm curious, aside from grip angle, is the 645 grip thicker and/or longer (from the palm to the fingers) than the 1911? I like the 1911, but it's nearly my size limit. I really like the CZ97, but the grip is just a tad too large.

Thoughts?


Can't comment on the grip of the 645 as I also sold mine long ago. I can comment that on a 1911 a change in grip thickness, mainspring housing and or trigger length can make a world of difference. I don't have huge hands and have found that a short trigger and flat mainspring housing are a must.
 
I've been shooting 1911's for so long that the grip feels just right. I do prefer a flat mainspring housing, but it isn't necessary for me to be happy.

I've never shot a non 1911 that feels as good to me.

I'm not sure but that I'd like a non 1911 if I devoted years to its use. I just don't think it would be worth the effort to me.

I'm a big believer in shooting a handgun that feels 'just right' to me.

That's a function of LOTS of practice over time. It isn't something that comes to me in a few range outings
 
Last edited:
I confess. Although not perfect, the first time I picked up a 1911, I knew it was for me. For sure, I knew flat backstops were for me, even in a Glock. I've bought other guns, 3913 and 3953 among them, and enjoy them just fine and they are flat. But I've never found anything I liked more than the 1911, some perhaps the same, but I still buy others and shoot them well.

The 645 is more of a want than a need. I wouldn't carry it, but as a target gin and home defense I would like to own one. I just want to be sure it's not so big in the grip, as the CZ97. As usual, no one has a 645 locally to handle.
 
I confess. Although not perfect, the first time I picked up a 1911, I knew it was for me. For sure, I knew flat backstops were for me, even in a Glock. I've bought other guns, 3913 and 3953 among them, and enjoy them just fine and they are flat. But I've never found anything I liked more than the 1911, some perhaps the same, but I still buy others and shoot them well.

The 645 is more of a want than a need. I wouldn't carry it, but as a target gin and home defense I would like to own one. I just want to be sure it's not so big in the grip, as the CZ97. As usual, no one has a 645 locally to handle.

Funny this came up. My LGS just took in a 645 on trade this week. I've been tempted to grab it but so far the thought of a safe already full of underused 1911's has held me at bay. I'm weakening with each visit though. Next time I pick it up for a fondle, it may just come home with me.
 
Funny this came up. My LGS just took in a 645 on trade this week. I've been tempted to grab it but so far the thought of a safe already full of underused 1911's has held me at bay. I'm weakening with each visit though. Next time I pick it up for a fondle, it may just come home with me.

Go get it! I have a bunch of 1911's but when I saw my 645 I just had to have it. It just looks brutish in a good way.
 
The grip on the 645 is straighter than the 1911 and the front strap is flat.

I enjoy the straighter grip as it feels more natural to me.

I use Pachmayr wrap arounds on the 1911 frame but just use grip panels on the S&W.

This fills in the rounded grip on the front of the 1911 making it easier for me to shoot.

BLM
 
I got one of the first 645s when they came out in the 1980s. At the time, I worked for a well known company that was affiliated with a local distributor. I was happy to find one at cost, so I took a chance.

On the plus side, it was pretty accurate out of the box. Better than any Colt, for sure, including the Gold Cup. No, it wasn't quite up to a Clark modified bullseye gun, but it was close.
Also, it fed everything, if you tinkered with loads. I even used mine with Lyman 255gr. SWCs intended for the Long Colt. The trigger was OK weight- wise. It was a pretty clean let off, but the long pull was weird compared to a revolver or tuned 1911.

On the downside, the grip was too upright for me, so it always seemed to point a bit low. I prefer an arched mainspring housing on a 1911 for that reason.

The 645 was also the first stainless gun I owned. It was kind of cool to be able just wipe off powder residue!

Best regards,
Jim
 
If there was ever a gun that you put in your hands, and it felt just right, you knew it was a match made in heaven...the 645 was it for me.

The only other pistol I can say this about, in the past as well, is a 1911. Both just felt perfect, and it is hard to describe to others.
 
If there was ever a gun that you put in your hands, and it felt just right, you knew it was a match made in heaven...the 645 was it for me.

The only other pistol I can say this about, in the past as well, is a 1911. Both just felt perfect, and it is hard to describe to others.
Which explains it better than I could why I bought one just the other day... my very first 2nd Gen ever. Overpaid for it too (and at the worst possible time) so I'm both a bit embarrassed about it as well as upset that I acted on pure impulse rather than my usual rules, restraint and logic. :o

But GOD it was pretty and it fit in my hand like it was made for just me. I got caught up in the moment and next thing you know, I'm driving home with it. :o What the Hell just happened back there? :confused:

I'll post pix in time. I'm still a little bit in shock over it. I don't do well with acquisitions when I break the rules and overpay. It will take time for me to sort this out in my brain and figure out what it's going to take (i.e., what I'll need to sell) in order to pay for it. :(
 
Karma is a bear. React, but don't over react. Take your time, choose a gun from your safe that you can replace, if need be. For instance, don't sell a Colt Commander, blue, in 9mm, just because there's a blemish on the slide. It will be impossible to replace that gun...
 
Karma is a bear. React, but don't over react. Take your time, choose a gun from your safe that you can replace, if need be. For instance, don't sell a Colt Commander, blue, in 9mm, just because there's a blemish on the slide. It will be impossible to replace that gun...
I think that was directed at moi. :) Don't worry, I won't sell anything truly crucial to the collection. I've got a few candidates but that damn Model 645 cost me almost twice the value of the average everyday gun in my collection... so it's going to be painful regardless. For now, I can't even think about it. This was not a planned, well-conceived acquisition by any stretch. I hope it will work out well in time, but for now it's just a big fat debt sitting there in my budget. :(

Buy one, sell two. That's what it's gonna boil down to. :rolleyes:
 
I think that was directed at moi. :) Don't worry, I won't sell anything truly crucial to the collection. I've got a few candidates but that damn Model 645 cost me almost twice the value of the average everyday gun in my collection... so it's going to be painful regardless. For now, I can't even think about it. This was not a planned, well-conceived acquisition by any stretch. I hope it will work out well in time, but for now it's just a big fat debt sitting there in my budget. :(

Buy one, sell two. That's what it's gonna boil down to. :rolleyes:

"Beware of the man with one gun." We don't want to admit it, but we all have too many guns. There, I said it! That's the first step in the addiction healing process right?

You didn't think before you bought - that doesn't mean you didn't do the right thing. We buy guns to enjoy, not for necessity. You will enjoy the 645, probably more than you would whatever two guns you sell. Believe me, if I could get that darn 645 to fit me, I, too, would have overpaid for the right specimen.
 
"Beware of the man with one gun." We don't want to admit it, but we all have too many guns. There, I said it! That's the first step in the addiction healing process right?

You didn't think before you bought - that doesn't mean you didn't do the right thing. We buy guns to enjoy, not for necessity. You will enjoy the 645, probably more than you would whatever two guns you sell. Believe me, if I could get that darn 645 to fit me, I, too, would have overpaid for the right specimen.
Yeah, I know you are right. I know it was a good move. This is just me being me. ;) I'm the kind of guy that plans and starts saving for big purchases six months in advance... and this *was* a big purchase by my standards. The fact that it was totally unplanned and unbudgeted and utterly off the radar screen tends to shake me up. It's starts when I'm driving home and I start to think to myself "How the Hell are you going to pay for that thing you crazy old man"??? :eek:

But trust me... I'll survive. Gonna be a problem for a while but I'll survive. :p
 
I've held a 4506 and like the CZ97, it's a bit long for me, from the blackstrap to the frontstrap. Funny how the 1911 is thinner, in the sides, as well as shorter from the front strap to the backstrap.

So the question is, is the 645 grip, from the frontstrap to the backstrap as big as the 4506?
 
Last edited:
OK, so I've been following this since the first, but never did any
real measuring. I too, thought my full size frame 1911's, (Colts),
felt thinner, front to back. none of them are stock, and I put arched
mainspring housings on them. My full size S&W's always felt wider,
front to back, even with straight grips. (They all have arched grips
on now). Somehow the arched feel better to me. My 645 feels much
thinner than the 3rd gens, but still not like the 1911's.
So I measured and ALL are within 1/16" of one another, REALLY.
All were measured centered, at 90 deg from front straps. I can't
believe it. Must be the "diameter".
 

Latest posts

Back
Top