200 gr "Super Police"

brushy bill

US Veteran
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
52
Reaction score
2
Any opinions on the 200 gr "Super Police." According to below website, this is a 200 gr flat point round nose they intend to reintroduce. Not sure how effective it will be or use in older guns...

Blue Bunny Ammo Nashville, TN
 
Register to hide this ad
Some of my friends here like loads of that type. Perhaps Breaker Dan will weigh in on this one. Myself, I like hollowpoints. Most important, use what shoots to POA.
 
The British 38/200 used essentially the 38 S&W case and a 200 gr LRN bullet in their break-top Enfield and Webley revolvers and Lend-Lease S&W M&P 4" and 5" revolvers. The round was slow, but the bullet weight made the 38/200 reasonably effective according to accounts in books and other literature about British combat experiences.

Nothing wrong with a slow bullet if it has lotsa mass . . .

Noah
 
They claimed it to have almost the same stopping power as their .455. That's hard to imagine, than again, the .455 was a slooooowwww slug.
 
Groo here
The idea was to have a long slow bullet that would go unstable
after it hit..
This will require a very slow speed [around 600fps],if you drive it fast
it will remain point on and drive through.
 
I'm a fan of the 200 grain bullet in .38 Special for IDPA. Its easy to make SSR power factor (or ESR for that matter if one has a moon clipped .38 Special or .357) with the heavy slug. One only needs 625 fps for SSR or 825 fps for ESR, both easy to accomplish. For that purpose, I use my own cast Lyman 358430 bullets, which are round nose. I like the RN profile for IDPA because they go into the chambers so smoothly when reloading.

However, I think if one wants to revive the "Super Police" as a defensive round, it would be much better to do so with a 200 grain SWC or SWCHP. Pushed to the right velocity with soft alloy, the bullet should expand in HP format, or penetrate very nicely while cutting a better hole in SWC format. At low velocities the SWC would also retain the unstable nature if that were desired.

I'm seriously considering having a custom 200 grain SWC mold made by Mountain Molds so I can experiment with 200 grain SWCs in both .38 Special and .357 Magnum.
 
Brushy Bill,

Some bullets border on legendary status; think Speer 200gr 45 known as
the "flying ashtray," or the famous 158gr LSWCHP 38+P "FBI load". The Super Police,
though interesting is not one of them. It simply did not do the job for law enforcement.

I have done a lot of experimenting with the Super Police 200gr
load in several of my S&Ws. I got 575 fps from a 2" Model 36
and 624 fps from a 4" Model 15. I also handload an exact version
of the factory load using Magnus cast bullets based on the old
Lyman bullet that was almost identical to what was loaded by Winchester.

A little history on the 38 200 gr:

Back in the pre hollowpoint days when the law carried 38s, most used the "Police Service" 158 RNL for duty and practiced with 148 LWC. Skeeter Skelton, a border patrolman in the 1940-1950s and later gunwriter said that his border patrol issue sidearm in the late 40s was a Colt loaded with 158 RNL. Most were not impressed with this load and many savvy lawmen and shooters handloaded their own lead hollowpoints or simply carried a bigger bore gun. According to old cop lore, the 158 gr 38 was definitely a killer, but not a manstopper. It simply did not incapacitate subjects fast enough unless hit exactly right. Many stories exist of patrolmen putting all six in the chest and then being killed by the crooks they just shot.

I picked up 2 boxes of these 200 gr loads recently at a gun show
and an older gentleman at a table saw them in my hand and
immediately said "I hope you don't think those loads are something special." I told him I just bought them to experiment with and he again basically said they were not what they were cracked up to be.

A 200 gr loading of the 38 Special was introduced as best I can tell sometime in the late 30s. It is very similar to a 41 Colt. The 200 gr
bullet was rated at about 650fps and was supposed to be a better manstopper. It was designed to be slow and unstable and when it hit the bullet would turn sideways doing more damage. On the downside,
police need more tactical penetration through things like windshields and car doors and a bullet going 650fps into a "classic" car just doesn't cut it.
I heard of a story where one LAPD officer tried to shoot through a side window of a car with this load and it did not make it through the glass.

In my personal experience, I have seen this load bounce off the pressed metal shell of an a/c window unit. Some cops I hear called the load "nerf bullets." It was a poor police load to say the least, but for up close self defense with no barriers/ glass it was a somewhat different story.
Up close and put in the right place it would probably be pretty good.
I have carried 200gr loads in my Model 36 and felt comfortable.
Elmer Keith and Chic Gaylord both said it was the best 38 load ever made in the 1960s but remember the only other loads available at the time in standard 38 were 158 RNL and 148WC.

I have heard of several anecdotal uses of the super police against subjects that were not behind cover:

One officer carried his Colt loaded with 3 LSWC dept. issue rounds and three 200gr loads. He said one subject took a LSWC to the chest and was not phased. A 200gr in the hip floored him.

FBI agent shot two subjects center of mass with 200 gr loads and both went down.

My dad still has an original box of 200gr Remington 38s and keeps his S&W Military and Police revolver loaded with them. He traps feral hogs
and said the bullet is quite effective on them.

One thing to remember and I am the world's worst about it. Old bullets worked well enough then, but the Super Police had a very short life with the police and it was discontinued nearly 30 years ago. If it works it gets used, if not it gets discontinued. In 1971, Winchester introduced the load that pretty much made all other 38s ineffective compared to it. They made a 158 LSWCHP to +P speed and the law enforcement world jumped on it including the FBI. Cops called it the "38 splat" because of the sound it made when it hit. FBI agents said it hit like 45 ball ammo. I can personally attest to the effectiveness of the FBI 38 load on a feral dog. It works.

About the time the 38 Super Police was discontinued, a 110 gr 38 +P+ load emerged that became known as the "Treasury Load" The fad in the 1970s and 1980s was a 110-115gr bullet loaded hot in both 9mm and 38. It was said to be VERY effective when it penetrated deep enough. Some on this forum have had good results with this load in law enforcement. The Border Patrol carried it for 4 years and ditched it. This load is now no longer available to the public unless you find it at gun shows second hand. I have some of it.

The only "old" 38 load that has stood the test of time for being a fight stopper is the 158 LSWCHP FBI load. It penetrates sufficiently and expands even from a 2." The 147gr Hydra Shock 38+P+ replaced this load in FBI service sometime in the late 1980s- early 1990s and it worked too.

Just my two cents and I wanted to add in little history on the bullet.
It would work but the FBI 158 LSWCHP is certainly better. If I couldnt carry a hollowpoint in the 38, then the only 38 load I would use would be the 200gr. Especially make a 200gr full wadcutter and it would be ok.
 
Last edited:
Thanks to all and esp Breaker Dan for a great history on the "Super Police". Appreciate your time and I learned a lot. Lot of teriffic folks on the Forum.
 
Thanks BreakerDan for that very informative post!

The 1965 Gunner's Bible lists "Remington-Peters Center-Fire Pistol Cartridge Ballistics" and shows the .38 Special 200 grain round at 730 fps. As you and others have stated, current tests of the old factory ammo have shown it to be in the 600+ fps range. This appears to be another example of the old literature giving velocities that real users could not expect to obtain from their sidearms.
 
Last edited:
I confess to a slight hankering for a 200 lead SWC for .38 Special. Making use of data in the Lyman 46th manual (for their 195 grain bullet), it is easy to propel 200 grain bullets to 825-925 fps range depending on barrel length. This puts a bit more "starch in the drawers" of the performance of the 200 grain bullet in .38 Special.

Of course such data is not "politically correct" in these days of watered-down data but any of several .38 Special revolvers around here are none the worse for wear from the use of it.
 
Last edited:
I confess to a slight hankering for a 200 lead SWC for .38 Special. Making use of data in the Lyman 46th manual (for their 195 grain bullet), it is easy to propel 200 grain bullets to 825-925 fps range depending on barrel length. This puts a bit more "starch in the drawers" of the performance of the 200 grain bullet in .38 Special.

Of course such data is not "politically correct" in these days of watered-down data but any of several .38 Special revolvers around here are none the worse for wear from the use of it.

We are on the same page with the 200 grain SWC, I wish such molds were more available. I get between 875 and 900 fps from my 4" S&W 681-3 using my own cast Lyman 358430 (with my WW alloy and lube 201-202 grains), Federal SP primers, and either 6.9 grains of HS-6 or 9.5 grains of 2400. Of course, as you say, neither load is politically correct these days, though they seem to have been safe in the early 1970's; go figure? :)

Thanks BreakerDan for that very informative post!

The 1965 Gunner's Bible lists "Remington-Peters Center-Fire Pistol Cartridge Ballistics" and shows the .38 Special 200 grain round at 730 fps. As you and others have stated, current tests of the old factory ammo have shown it to be in the 600+ fps range. This appears to be another example of the old literature giving velocities that real users could not expect to obtain from their sidearms.

Perhaps the 730 fps data was from a 8" barrel, given current tests with vintage "Super Police" ammunition running in the mid 600's in a 4" tube, 730 in a barrel twice as long isn't unreasonable.

At any rate, getting "Super Police" performance with handloads is nothing, using the same components and revolver listed above I have gotten mid 600-700 fps using all the following powders: 3.0 grains Titegroup, 5.2 grains HS-6, 5.6 grains HS-6, 4.3 grains Trail Boss, 4.5 grains Trail Boss.

I really have no idea how well the 200 grain RNL works on living targets, but its fantastic for IDPA.
 
Last edited:
I took a small whitetail buck with a Remington component 200 grain lead round nose bullet that was propelled by a max load of 2400 to 925 fps from the 8 3/8-inch barrel of a Smith & Wesson Model 14. Settled his hash from about 17 yards.
 
Remington loaded a 200 grain LRN 38 special during the time of the "Super Police" round by Winchester. Does the Remington version perform any better/worse than the Super Police? I have a few boxes of it somewhere.
 
Perhaps the 730 fps data was from a 8" barrel, given current tests with vintage "Super Police" ammunition running in the mid 600's in a 4" tube, 730 in a barrel twice as long isn't unreasonable.
I believe you are correct. My point is that Remington advertised velocities for their factory loads that real world users would find impossible to achieve in their 2" and 4" barrel sidearms.
 
I have a related question. If the 200 gr. Super Police load was an attempt to provide .41 Colt ballistics from the .38 Special (both actually being chambered in the same Colt frame), has anyone checked the ACTUAL velocities produced by the .41 Colt?

I looked for a Colt Army Special or Official Police in .41 Colt for a long time (not a collectible but a good shooter) but never found one I didn't think was way too dear for my purposes. All I wanted was to learn the .41 Colt cartridge. I did get a 5" OP and was told that I could just load a 200 gr. to about 800-850 fps to duplicate the .41 Colt (aside from the small diameter difference).
 
Remington loaded a 200 grain LRN 38 special during the time of the "Super Police" round by Winchester. Does the Remington version perform any better/worse than the Super Police? I have a few boxes of it somewhere.

The Remington load had a more pointed bullet to it almost in a conical shape rather than the round head on the Winchester. I would think the Remington load would tumble when it hit something due to the bullet shape. The Remington load is made of harder lead while the Winchester has very soft light colored lead. Of the few Remington 200gr loads I have fired they seemed to be a little hotter than Winchester but not by much. Outwardly, the Remington version looks identical to 158 RNL but has an extra cannelure on the case about midway back (2 grooves). The 158 RNL only has one groove just below the case mouth.
 
I have a related question. If the 200 gr. Super Police load was an attempt to provide .41 Colt ballistics from the .38 Special (both actually being chambered in the same Colt frame), has anyone checked the ACTUAL velocities produced by the .41 Colt?

I looked for a Colt Army Special or Official Police in .41 Colt for a long time (not a collectible but a good shooter) but never found one I didn't think was way too dear for my purposes. All I wanted was to learn the .41 Colt cartridge. I did get a 5" OP and was told that I could just load a 200 gr. to about 800-850 fps to duplicate the .41 Colt (aside from the small diameter difference).

I probably should have phrased that a little different. The 200 gr bullet is very similar in both and since the 41 was regarded as a decent fighting round. It is roughly the same concept. From what I heard the inside lubed 41s were actually .386 versus the SP at .358. Not much difference.

Mike Venturino chronographed some 41 Colt rounds in a 4 3/4" Colt SAA and said it gave anywhere between 675-800fps. The factory W-W rounds he fired with the Lubaloy coating were around 725-750 if I remember correctly with a few getting close to 800. I have handloaded some 200 gr bullets to 725 or so from a 4" Colt OP and they worked well, though they did hit high. Super Police loads generally hit high from most fixed sighted 38s of the day. My dad's 1946 M&P hits point of aim with 200grs but nothing else I have fired them in does. I too have always wanted to play with the 41, but everything was just too expensive and 200gr 38s get me close enough. I have seen some 1960s 41 ammo going for 2-3 bucks a round lately. I just wonder why 41 went obsolete- some people said they were generally inaccurate guns due to mismatched guns and badly designed ammo.
 
Back
Top