28-2 vs 28-3 Price

pd1964

Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
119
Reaction score
493
Location
Alberta Canada
I'm assuming a 28-3 would be worth less than a 28-2 in similar condition. Wondering how much less percentage wise.
Thanks
 
Register to hide this ad
28-2s are very, very common. 28-3s are uncommon, so much so that the only place I have seen one is on the internet. That contradicts your assumption that they are worth less.
 
Ok good to know. I'm looking at one now but the seller is calling it a 28-2 but says it dates 82-86. Trying to sort out what it is no pictures posted or I could tell what it is. So in your opinion what would it be worth more than a 28-2?
 
Last edited:
My first gun was a new 28-3, and I would still be willing to pay more for a dash 2.
 
As a new guy to this, I find this question very interesting.
I've done quite a bit of reading. Here's what I've read.
28-2 are very common.
A dash 3, have not read a single post about it.
Also, never read about dash 1, or a m28 no dash, or a pre model 28.
I guess I need to read more?
 
Pre-28s, or more properly just Highway Patrolmans, and 28 no dashes are often pictured and discussed here. It is debated whether or not the illusive 28-1 exists.

Regarding 28-3s, scarcity alone does not create value. Demand created by continued praise can trump scarcity and the non-functional barrel pin is worshiped. That makes opining on whether a dash 3 is worth more or less that a dash 2 as pointless as offering the pope your opinion of which religion is best.

I prefer which ever one has early carry up, tight lock up and no end shake but has holster wear to keep the price down. That describes the two I bought about 3 years ago pretty well, a 4" 28-2 for $300 and a 6" 28-2 for about $400. While the 4" looks a bit ratty it came with Target Stocks and a Target Hammer. Eye candy for pictures to display here costs a lot more. In fairness I should add that the man who sold me the 4" also sold me another gun with a serious undisclosed defect so the problem gun balances out the great deal.

Whats a m28 no dash, 6" barrel worth?
You know better than to ask without giving a hint about condition.
 
Last edited:
I'm assuming a 28-3 would be worth less than a 28-2 in similar condition. Wondering how much less percentage wise.
Thanks

Welcome to the FORUM! I am not a collector, but a shooter. Not for the most part not hung up on dash numbers. Do have a 6", 28 no dash from 1960. The only gun I have multiple dashes of, is 29-2, & 29-3. Bob
 
Even within the -2s, there are some folks that would pay more for early ones ("S prefix") than later ones ("N prefix"). Some folks just love those diamond decorations on the stocks. :)

As far as shooting qualities, the -3 may be as good as any and better than most. But some of us just like those older features and do not need to justify our preferences. :)

For myself, I would rank their desirability as follows:
1. M28-1 (if it exists)
2. M28 No Dash
3. Highway Patrolman / Pre-28
4. M28-2, S prefix
5. M28-2, N prefix
6. M28-3

But that's just me. If someone wants to rewrite this list for his tastes, have at it!
 
I have a pre 28 Highway Patrolman, several 28-2 a couple of them S prefix guns. They all work and shoot well. I believe someone here posted an actual 28-1 once. Several no dashed have been posted. I have to agree with Jacks list and order. Only the order of the no dash and the pre being debatable.
 
never read about dash 1
That is probably because they are practically a unicorn. Extremely rare.

k22fan writes:
It is debated whether or not the illusive 28-1 exists
We've seen exactly one. The serial number is S225243, it shipped on August 8, 1962, to a distributor in Philadelphia. I believe it now lives in Arizona.
 
Thanks for the replies. I bought a very nice 28-2 a few weeks ago and am looking at a 28-3 that is priced higher than what I paid for the 28-2. So this tells me I should be paying the same or less if I do end up making an offer.
Cheers
 
Last edited:
I usually figure 10-15% more for a pinned and recessed revolver
I think I read that generalization in The Blue Book of Gun Values of some other price guide decades ago. It might even be good for average customers buying the most common revolvers.

There are exceptions. For example, Model 25-5 cylinder throats were tightened shortly after pinning barrels was discontinued. Older 25-5s are less accurate so they are worth less. To lower K frame manufacturing costs S&W discontinued the gas rings that had protruded from the front of hand ejector cylinders since the 19th Century. Binding cylinders forced S&W to admit they'd gone too far cheapening their flag ship revolver and after a year and a half that ended in 1977 went back to installing gas rings. Revolvers from that year and a half of pinned barrel K frame production are worth less to me than 1980s revolvers that lack the barrel pin but have gas rings in their cylinders. Admittedly, pure collectors may have priorities that are different from owners who use their guns.
 
I have a 28-2 4 inch with S Serial number in near new condition and I wouldn't trade it for a mint 28-3 4 inch barrel model in mint condition.
 
IMHO, only good quality pictures raise the price of a certain handguns and how offen it was posted here with favorable conversations and praise? A quality handgun is just that!
Steve
 
The most accurate I ever owned was a 6" 28-3. The 28-1 lives east of the Mississippi river now. For those that claim the 28-1 does not exist, read more. There is also a YouTube video (if it is still up)
 

Attachments

  • 20171023_044450.jpg
    20171023_044450.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 52
The most accurate I ever owned was a 6" 28-3. The 28-1 lives east of the Mississippi river now. For those that claim the 28-1 does not exist, read more. There is also a YouTube video (if it is still up)

Thanks for the update. My notes show this gun left the factory on August 8, 1962, and shipped to Philadelphia. It is the only 28-1 I have ever seen, and that only in pictures.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top