3 FTFs today after 1500rounds after pigtail spring removed

Primers and mythology

One of the most persistent myths in shooting is that there are hard primers and soft primers. That isn't true. The real issue is primer sensitivity or-more frequently-something within the gun or loading process that causes the gun to go click when it shoulda' gone bang.
All four of the major ammunition companies make primers and they all do it pretty much the same way. Thin brass and steel in huge rolls is bought from a mill. From it, primer cups and anvils, respectively, are stamped by simple presses. Everybody does it this way. A soapy lubricant is used in the stamping operations, both cup and anvil are then washed, dried and sent off to become primers. Some primer cups receive a thin nickel plating.
While there may be some small differences in specifications for the raw brass from one maker to the other, none of it is hardened-it couldn't be stamped right if it was. It is common knowledge that brass work-hardens with bending, but the only place that could happen to a significant degree would be along the radius where it rounds out from bottom to sides.
There is no need to worry much about hardness in that area since it isn't where the firing pin strikes. There have been instances where that area became so hard as to be brittle, and there could be a tiny perforation when the primer was fired. Some manufacturers include an annealing step to prevent that possibility.
But since there is no "work" done to the bottom of the cup, it is much less affected and remains essentially as it came from the mill. Still, everyone who reloads has probably experienced a misfire, and found that the firing pin impression on the primer was much smaller than normal. It is perfectly reasonable to think that individual primer was hard, but the trouble can almost always be traced to other causes. Very often, that primer will fire if it is hit again.
A common reason for that type of misfire in semi-automatic firearms is that the gun was not fully into the battery position. Semi-automatics, regardless of the type, must have a part called the disconnector that prevents the gun from firing out of battery. But if the slide closes almost all the way, the disconnector may allow the hammer to fall. Then a substantial portion of the firing pin's energy will be absorbed simply in pushing the slide into battery. That can almost always be traced to a dirty gun, but sometimes a weak recoil spring is the culprit. It can also be a shooter-induced malfunction by either "limp wristing" the pistol or by restricting slide movement with a faulty grip. The most common cause of misfires in revolvers is a weakened mainspring-often as a result of an effort to reduce the trigger pull. Those misfires are characterized by a light hit on the primer.
Stories of hard primers are much more commonly told by hand loaders than shooters of factory ammunition. The major cause of misfires in hand loaded ammunition is a fault in the primer seating operation. What's ideal is for the primer to be seated so the anvil is just touching the bottom of the primer pocket. In practical terms, that means the primer should be 0.003''-0.005'' below flush with the head of the cartridge. If it isn't, the resulting "high primer" may misfire since the firing pin's energy is absorbed seating the primer the rest of the way.
It is also possible to induce a misfire by seating the primer too deeply. Many priming tools are capable of actually crushing the primer. If that happens, it is possible the primer mix inside the cup fractures or pulverizes, and if the primer mix cannot be compressed by the firing pin strike, a misfire is the result.
While the primer is the sparkplug that gets things going, it is also the stopper that keeps the genie in the bottle. It's equally important other job is to seal the primer pocket so the pressure has to push the bullet down the bore. This obturation function is just another reason why primers can't be too hard. Since hardened brass becomes brittle-which would be a bad thing-it is in the interest of the manufacturers to prevent primer cups from becoming too hard.
The primer's malleability is the property that often leads reloaders astray. We are always told to watch for signs of high pressure by observing the fired primer. All primers have a radius between the flat bottom and side wall. A change there is taken to be a pressure indicator. And so it is, but there is substantial evidence to show that by the time the primer is noticeably flattened, pressures already are well above maximum. Other things reloaders look for are a diminished firing pin imprint, cratering around the firing pin impression or the smearing of primer metal outside the primer pocket. In more egregious cases, there
will be enlargement of the primer pocket and possibly leakage around the primer. Those are signs that are far more serious and proof positive that the load is over maximum pressure. In the very worst case, the spent primer simply falls out.
In locked-breech semi-automatic pistols, there is a sign that can be misunderstood, but is indirect evidence that a load is too hot. The short recoil design common today allows the slide and barrel to recoil as a unit for a short distance before the barrel unlocks and drops down to let the slide continue in recoil. It is something that happens very quickly, and sometimes it is so fast that the firing pin does not have time to retract back into the slide before the barrel begins to drop down. The result is a primer with an elongated firing pin impression and, in a worst case; primer metal can actually be sheared off. While there are other causes, firing pin drag along the primer is often an indication of an excessive load.
As with all other things in shooting, the equipment we have today has evolved sequentially as one advance opened the door for the next one. As an example, in the early 1800s the Rev. Alexander John Forsyth-a Scottish minister-found that certain chemical compounds, among them fulminate of mercury, could be made to detonate with a blow. Within just a few years, the flintlock rifle was made obsolete by the percussion cap. One of the drawbacks of any muzzle loading firearm is that there has to be a hole somewhere to permit ignition. It must have been one of those "eureka" moments when someone figured out that a primer could also seal the breech end of a cartridge case. It was immediately more efficient. In his Complete Guide to Hand Loading, The American Rifleman's Phil Sharpe wrote, "There is more real romance wrapped up in the little primer of your cartridge than in any other single development of firearms science." Primer development knew no national boundaries, but American and British efforts were quickly accepted as standard. Interestingly, the Berdan primer, which is used everywhere but the U.S., was an American invention, and the Boxer primer we use came from Great Britain.
Very early in the history of cartridge cases, standardization came about in the form of large primers with a diameter of 0.210'' and small ones at 0.175''. In addition, there was distinction between rifle and pistol primers since the powders used in handgun cartridges rarely needed as energetic a mix to get them going compared with rifle loads. That picture becomes even muddier when we add magnum primers to the equation. Both the quantity of primer mix and its chemistry are the controlled variables that make this work.
While the diameters of both rifle and pistol primers are the same, the height is not. It is not unusual to see small rifle primers loaded in handgun cases for exceptionally high pressure loads. Examples would be the super magnum handgun rounds, such as the .454 Casull, which typically uses a small rifle primer. Another would be their use in cartridges such as hand loads for the .38 Super when pumped up to make major velocities in practical shooting. But that doesn't work with large primers. The large rifle primer is too high to seat in a pistol case.
 
Good stuff John. So, even though we are saying hard vs. soft primers, truth be told it is just a matter of how the primers are seated? Sorry, I am not a reloader. It just seems to me that the factory stuff is so inexpensive that I can't really justify reloading. But, if certain factory ammo has a Rep. of having hard primers, according to your post it is really a matter of proper seating. Otherwise, fail to fires are generally spring related. Is that it in a nut shell, or am I missing something. Hey, it's almost midnight here so I may be a bit fuzzy.
 
i still dont understand why everyone is removing the pig tail spring. that spring is not the reason for the hard trigger pull, all it does is to help reset. take the slide off and pull the trigger there is almost zero resistance.

my only concern with the pigtail spring was that it was wearing a grove in the plastic. i spoke with several guys who have fired 1000s of rounds without a problem as well as S&W techs they all say the same thing, not a problem.
 
Actually, once I took mine off to smooth out some parts, it was just too much of a hassle to put it back on. And considering the fact that no one has reported having problems with their sigma with out it, I saw no reason to replace it. I see no reason to use +P+ ammo so maybe that's the reason I have had no issues with my sigma after I removed it. If I ever start having problems with the operation of my pistol, that can be attributed to the absence of the "pigtail" spring, I will replace it. I still have the original parts.
 
Back
Top