44 mag vs 45 Colt

I've seen several references to Ruger only (~30Kpsi or even a little higher) in rifles. There are plenty of actions where I agree. Uberti makes some 1873s in .44Mag, but I'm not sure I'm willing to run a bunch of Ruger only loads through an 1873 in .45 Colt.
 
If you're an experienced hand loader, 45 Colt is superior to 44mag in both handgun and rifle.
There's essentially three levels of pressure loads for 45 colt. Standard cowboy loads. 14,000 psi. Even the existing guns made in 1873 will handle these. Modern manufactured handguns made after roughly 1970 will handle all 45 Colt loads that are the equivalent of 45acp+p pressure (24,000 psi) and then the 45colt +p loads that are listed usually as the Ruger/Thompson Encore loads at 31,000 psi. Most/many of the third tier loads will exceed top end 44 mag loads in muzzle energy. Any rifle will handle the Ruger/Thompson Encore loads (i.e. 30,000 psi) with no problem.

So there's tons of versatility in power with 45 colt. It's a larger bullet that cuts a bigger hole and can deliver more power on target in the right platform.

But it's also more complicated to keep track of all those different types of loads for different guns. And you can't really buy any Tier 2 factory ammo. Just tier 1 and tier 3. If you're not a hand loader 44 mag is likely the better option.
Exactly right!
 
Also that Pedersoli pump 45 Colt is sweet. I'm jealous of that beauty.

Thank you. When I saw it at an auction in Pa. I had to buy it. Never have been a fan of a lever gun (yes, I know that is blasphamy). We always had pump shotguns and Remington Model 760's that my Grandfather & Father hunted deer with in NY, Pa. & Ohio. So I guess that is where my liking of the Pedersoli comes from. Besides it is a beautiful rifle.
ColtLightning3.webp
 
I have lever guns in both .44 Magnum and .45 Colt. The cylinder walls in a .44M revolver are thicker and made of stronger steel than the extremely thin walls of a .45 Colt SA or Smith. For safety, I never load hotter for carbines than for hand guns. .45 Colt in a carbine produces a satisfying increase in power and a reassuring thump in the shoulder. .44M, on the other hand, nearly equals the energy of a .30-30, with comparable recoil.
 
I believe modern .45 brass is just as strong as the .44. If you look at some of Taffin's stuff, the .45 can be loaded hotter with less pressure.
You are correct.
The factories and reloading manual are more cautious with .45 LC because they know there are still a lot of old .45 LC revolvers out there whose owners are not cautious or knowledgeable about high pressures and old guns.
There are also a lot of replica old design lever guns chambered in the Colt cartridge in use that hot loads are not kind to.
 
I had always heard the reason winchester dident make a 45 colt lever gun during the hayday of lever guns was due to the rim of the colt case. I know they make them now but i dont know anyone who has one and if this is still an issue in modern times. I have a 44 lever gun it works fine. Just have to use a bullet that feeds and chambers.

No longer an issue since they changed the rim size decades ago .
 
Exactly right!
The 1866 and 1873 Winchester (Uberti) rifles should not be used with any of the higher-pressure .44 Special or .45 Colt loads.
I know because I have Uberti 1866 and 1873 Winchester rifles in .44 Special. I keep my 200 gr. lead bullet loads in the 1300 fps range. No toggle link or frame stretching so far.
Even that load at a medium speed whacks things pretty good out to 100-150 yards or so. Have only shot one deer with the 1866 so far. Banged lots of steel targets though.
 
I've never been a fan of the big magnums. Just don't care for all that buck and roar. :rolleyes:
I own trapper length lever guns in .44 Mag and .45 Colt. I honestly don't remember the last time I fired a .44 magnum out of my rifle. I much prefer the .44 Special. ;)
As for the .45 Colt, a standard velocity .45 Colt will do whatever you ask of it. No need to hot rod it at all.
 
So, just thinking about getting a lever action. I was looking at both the 44 and 45. When I look at the SAAMI data, the 44 mag is between 36-40k while the 45 Colt is only a paltry 14k. I understand that the case is part of the equation but that much of a difference? If they made a better case for the 45 Colt could the pressure be upped. I did a quick search for 44 VS 45 and of course the 44 came out ahead. Funny thing is when you look at the case, they are almost identical except for the diameter. COL is almost the same as well. Is SAAMI just being too cautious?
The best and most definitive answer to your question is found in "Dissolving The Myth" by John Linbaugh (just Google it). The best caliber choice will depend on your intended use of the rifle; hunting, general shooting enjoyment, etc. Avoid the "which is better" internet discussions at all costs. I have handgun hunted and handloaded both calibers since the '70's and am a big fan of both. They are both capable of taking any game animal in the lower 48, and at the same time, both capable of providing hours of pleasant shooting with appropriate loads.
 
I've never been a fan of the big magnums. Just don't care for all that buck and roar. :rolleyes:
I own trapper length lever guns in .44 Mag and .45 Colt. I honestly don't remember the last time I fired a .44 magnum out of my rifle. I much prefer the .44 Special. ;)
As for the .45 Colt, a standard velocity .45 Colt will do whatever you ask of it. No need to hot rod it at all.
The .44 Magnum carbines beat the crap out of me with all but the lightest loads.
Will never own another one unless it is a full-sized rifle with an octagon barrel.
Rossi makes a decent reproduction of the 1892 rifle, but the buttstock architecture is all jacked up. Way too much drop.
Why they chose not to simply copy the original shape is beyond me. Would not nave cost any more to do.
 
I would not tell anyone what to choose, we each have to work out our own salvation but I will share what I have done;

My first "heavy" revolver was a 7.5" .44 Magnum, I was already handloading for .45 auto, .30 carbine and .357 magnum.

My Ruger shot well. My cousin, who is 4 years older and a gun guy, bought a 7.5" ruger in .45 Colt.

I assured him that the .44 was "more powerful" to which he said: "prove it" - and so we set up tests of shooting various things, from Oak barrel lids, to 12" lengths of logs, to wet news print.

To be sure his loads were under the Ruger levels of two or three loading manuals - we didn't yet have a chronograph back then but the book showed his loads (IIRC with IMR-4227) at 1250+ with a 255 gr. SWC.

We were both shooting true Keith bullets out of Lyman molds cast at home.

Well, I couldn't prove the .44 was better because it wasn't - it came in second in every test. I was using Elmer's load but with a little more "juice" - I was shooting 24 gr. of 2400.

Since then I've shot deer and wild boar with both the .45 Colt and the .44 magnum - what I found is not all that precise because I've only shot a few with each (I have been on hand when I've seen several dozen critters shot by other people of both species - I actually learn more from those). I find, genereally speaking, given the same shot placment, game drops quicker with a .45 Colt loaded to 1000 fps than a .44 Magnum loaded to 1500 fps - but I'd hate to live on the difference.

When I comes to carbines, back in the early 80s I fooled with a home cast 345 gr. Gould Express bullet swaged down to .452" - my slowly developed load when about 1050 fps out of my 4 5/8" Ruger BH - shortly after that Ross Seyfreid published the results of ~350 gr. bullets from a 5.5 or 6" barrel in his John Linebaugh built Seville at IIRC 1350 and had them tested at HP White labs they ran around 25,000 PSI - much lower pressure than the the .44 Mag - but also MUCH more powerful.

Satisfied my 345 at 1050 was not pushing as much pressure, I tried them in my 16" Winchester Wrangler - they clocked 1540 fps!

While my bullet is a hollow point, it is cast pretty hard and doesn't open so it is like an LFN bullet - I shot a big doe through a 4" tree with this bullet - she went down instantly!

I don't think the .44 is a bad round, in fact I have killed two deer (both does) with a .44 Spl. and could not ask for better. That said the first wild boar I shot was with a 5" Model 29 using Norma Carbine loads that drove the 240 gr steel jacketed cup point to 1530 in that gun - the boar did not respond at all but the dogs rushed in to attack it so I could not shoot again - after about 10-15 seconds we noticed it was getting "wobbly legged" and it fell - it was shot through the heart.

While I still use .44s, in fact I am wearing a 3" 624 as a BUG as I type, I have come to like .45s better. They get the job done with less flash and blast - actually, while I like them all, I think the "sweet spot" is the handloaded .45 Auto Rim.

If I lived in Grizzly country, I might favor the .44 for its slightly better penetration - but around here, I've not had either round stop in a critter - I considder that a good thing!

Just Ramblin'

Riposte

PS - I did try both 325 and 340 gr. cast bullets in .44 Magnum as well - but I had to borrow molds, so I eventually dropped that project.
 
There are also a lot of replica old design lever guns chambered in the Colt cartridge in use that hot loads are not kind to.

Let's be clear here. Due to metallurgy improvements even replicas of old guns (like a replica 1873 or a S&W no. 2) can handle Tier 2 45 Colt loads. So these are loads at or below 24,000 psi. Some loads in this category are plenty stout to take large game easily.

Tier 1 loads are 14,000 psi cowboy loads.
Tier 3 loads are 31,000 psi Ruger/Thompson Encore loads.
 
Let's be clear here. Due to metallurgy improvements even replicas of old guns (like a replica 1873 or a S&W no. 2) can handle Tier 2 45 Colt loads. So these are loads at or below 24,000 psi. Some loads in this category are plenty stout to take large game easily.

Tier 1 loads are 14,000 psi cowboy loads.
Tier 3 loads are 31,000 psi Ruger/Thompson Encore loads.
I agree that the metallurgy use in today's guns is in some ways better than what was used 100 to 170 years ago, but the toggle-link designs used in the past are still inherently weak. A little stronger than in times past, but still not very robust.
.44 and .45 caliber 200 to 250 grain lead bullets leaving the muzzle at 1,000 to 1,300 fps are still killers and good steel plate smackers out to 100-150 yards if you can put the bullet in the right place.
 
The 45 Colt is not a 44 Magnum. SAAMI specs on either of them is the specs that you need to reload to. 60 years difference or maybe more in the invention of either - lots happened in between and it mattered.
 
With an 1892 action you can load the 45 colt up to ruger Blackhawk pressures 32k psi no problem and safely and starline brass is tested for magnum levels, that's from starlines statement as well. Even the Marlin 94 is in this category. I have several of both 44 and 45 colt revolvers and rifles and been using these loads for over 50 years. I'll go with the 45 colt any day of the week!
Back in my 45LC (Ruger) days, I routinely loaded 24 gr 4227 behind a 250-gr cast bullet. Fairly stout load, but manageable and accurate.
 
Forgive my ignorance but I have a couple of questions regarding this thread generally...
A. I'm not really a "rifle guy" although I do have a couple, one of which is a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem. I'm interested in a pistol caliber lever and have considered a .357 but those seem to be held in VERY high esteem by their manufacturers! VERY expensive! I could get a .45-70 way cheaper but I've always been led to believe that that's almost an elephant load and way too powerful for anything I'd ever be interested in shooting. Someone said here (I think) that a .45-70 would enable you to shoot .45LC also. That true?
B. I think I remember reading long ago that S&W made a .45LC in a DA revolver and that it was available with a short barrel. Can any of you guys confirm this?
Thanks in advance. Ed
 
If you want a rifle that'll allow you to maximize performance, why buy a pistol caliber? Just get a 45-70. On the other hand, if you actually want pistol caliber performance in a carbine, buy the one that works best for you. Personally, I have lever guns in both .357 and .44 magnum. It's pointless to try to stretch the .357 gun and ammo to the limit, when I can easily just grab a bigger gun.
I really enjoy shooting the .45 Colt, .44 Special, and .44 Magnum. But I have never had an interest in stoking the older rounds. The 45 Colt does what it does, and the .44 Magnum does what it does. And frankly, I sometimes just like carrying a larger bore revolver that is a pleasure to shoot. Shooting a .45 Colt SAA with a lower pressure load is really a slice of Heaven, and I've never entertained the thought that it was somehow inadequate.
 
Forgive my ignorance but I have a couple of questions regarding this thread generally...
A. I'm not really a "rifle guy" although I do have a couple, one of which is a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem. I'm interested in a pistol caliber lever and have considered a .357 but those seem to be held in VERY high esteem by their manufacturers! VERY expensive! I could get a .45-70 way cheaper but I've always been led to believe that that's almost an elephant load and way too powerful for anything I'd ever be interested in shooting. Someone said here (I think) that a .45-70 would enable you to shoot .45LC also. That true?
B. I think I remember reading long ago that S&W made a .45LC in a DA revolver and that it was available with a short barrel. Can any of you guys confirm this?
Thanks in advance. Ed
The .45-70 and .45 Colt are not interchangeable in either direction. The .45-90 will chamber the .45-70 with some slight loss in performance, and in the 19th century this was commonly done when the larger load was not in supply. Smith and Wesson does make the Model 25 in .45 Colt, though to the best of my knowledge they never made a cataloged barrel length shorter than four inches. Perhaps someone knows better? Cheers
 
I've never been a fan of the big magnums. Just don't care for all that buck and roar. :rolleyes:
I own trapper length lever guns in .44 Mag and .45 Colt. I honestly don't remember the last time I fired a .44 magnum out of my rifle. I much prefer the .44 Special. ;)
As for the .45 Colt, a standard velocity .45 Colt will do whatever you ask of it. No need to hot rod it at all.
I had some .44 Russian ammo on the shelf, and ran that through my Smith 29-2. What a pleasure to shoot.
 
Forgive my ignorance but I have a couple of questions regarding this thread generally...
A. I'm not really a "rifle guy" although I do have a couple, one of which is a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem. I'm interested in a pistol caliber lever and have considered a .357 but those seem to be held in VERY high esteem by their manufacturers! VERY expensive! I could get a .45-70 way cheaper but I've always been led to believe that that's almost an elephant load and way too powerful for anything I'd ever be interested in shooting. Someone said here (I think) that a .45-70 would enable you to shoot .45LC also. That true?
B. I think I remember reading long ago that S&W made a .45LC in a DA revolver and that it was available with a short barrel. Can any of you guys confirm this?
Thanks in advance. Ed
.454 Casull is the caliber discussed. This will give you options at really high pressures, as well as *****-cat level .45Colt.
 
The whole reason I started this thread was I saw a lever in the gun for sale section. I have been pondering getting one for quite a while now. First I start with the 357/38. Then I think why stop there. There is the 44mag and 45lc. Then I bounce to the 45-70 and 460 mag. Then I turn off my computer and walk away to let my head quiet down.o_O

I reload for all the calibers I just mentioned except for the 45-70. It is kind of like buying a motorcycle. You start off with a 600 because the sales guy tells you that getting a 250 is a waste because you will outgrow it quickly. So you ride it around for awhile and then all of the sudden you realize that you have outgrown the 600 and now you want something more powerful. So you get a more powerful bike, say a 1000. Pretty soon you are like, well gee wiz, the 1200 or 1300 is even better. Pretty soon you are looking at the Triumph Rocket III or maybe even loosing your mind and thinking about a Boss Hoss. Then I slap myself back to reality and stick with the 1600 you already have.

I really like the 357. I have several pistol in 357. I also have a 44S and a 45LC/45ACP/410 pistol. I have a 14 inch 460. I am trying hard to be able to justify in my own mind what is the cartridge that I can live with so that I don't look to get something different. I was looking at the 44mag for sale then went to the website and saw the 45LC one. Looks the same, no problem there. I then Googled the differences between the 45LC and the 44mag. That is when I saw that aside from the diameter, the cases were almost the same but the pressures were different. After reading some of the comments here I saw that you can increase the pressures. I understand the reason why some have not with all of the older guns on the market.

Now I just need to figure out what itch to scratch.
 
I am setting up my .357 Marlin for my use (RDS, sling, bright flashlight, etc). It would not be worth the $$ but for 2 things.

The first is it will be in the safe we are putting in our RV (we will never fly or do a long drive in a car again after my kidney transplant), and while an AR is exponentially better for my use, travel through random places might present legal or litigation problems based on cockamamie state laws. A lever is far less likely to cause pearl clutching and bloomer bunching from the low functioning adherents of Oedipus in some places.

The second is that depending how I load it, that lever gun will do anything I foresee needing. Since I broke my shoulder (as described to others, I gave that surgeon some really awful XRays from which to work), recoil is not my pal. My shotgun (M590 with VangComp treatment, RDS, sling and light) will eventually be sold, along with all of its ammo. I accept that the odds of my shoulder ever being as good as it was as issued are tiny, so I have to cheat and work around that. The calibers bigger than .357 are too likely to present the same problem as the shotgun, so they are not a consideration.
 
Forgive my ignorance but I have a couple of questions regarding this thread generally...
A. I'm not really a "rifle guy" although I do have a couple, one of which is a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem. I'm interested in a pistol caliber lever and have considered a .357 but those seem to be held in VERY high esteem by their manufacturers! VERY expensive! I could get a .45-70 way cheaper but I've always been led to believe that that's almost an elephant load and way too powerful for anything I'd ever be interested in shooting. Someone said here (I think) that a .45-70 would enable you to shoot .45LC also. That true?
B. I think I remember reading long ago that S&W made a .45LC in a DA revolver and that it was available with a short barrel. Can any of you guys confirm this?
Thanks in advance. Ed


"""""Someone said here (I think) that a .45-70 would enable you to shoot .45LC also. That true?"""---------------------

Absolutely NOT!!! Not safely.

The 45-70 must have a chamber that is 0.504 inches at the rim and 0.481 inches at the front of the case, 2.105 inches forward' The bullet that fits inside that big case is 0.454 inches diameter.

The 45 Colt is much smaller, only 0.480 where it leaves the rim and only 0.454 at the forward end of the case, only 1.285 inches from the rim.

Practically it will fit inside the chamber and since the bullet is smaller 454 vs 458, it will rattle down the barrel. If the firing pin is such that it will hit the primer. The specs are that the 45 Colt only has a rim 0.60 inches, the bigger 45-70 case has a rim that is 0.70 inches, so the firing pin must be longer to set off the Colt. A small difference like that means you have to test it and with different ammo or different cases and different primers if you reload.

I collect levers and own several in the calibers discussed,, I also have many handguns in 44 mag and 45 Colt, short ones, long ones, 5 shot ones, six shot ones, Ruger only ones and Peacemaker size, AND I have the 454 and 45-70 for comparison.

Short story. We have multiple lever guns in 357, old Marlins, new Remlins, and the Rossis, barrels of 16.5, 18, 18.5 and 20 inches. Opinion. There is no real value in the old JM Marlins, I just get more money if I sell you one.

Second, the smartest pistol caliber lever gun outside of actually grizzly areas is the 357. They all exceed the 44 mag handguns in power, and carry more ammo.

Third, the 454 Casul by Rossi and others is the best in power at a reasonable cost, available in stainless in the 16.5 and 20 inch barrel.

Note, the Rossi 92 in 454 Casul will handle 65,000 PSI, the other designs will not come close, it must be the model 92 with the twin action bars to handle this power which is roughly twice the power of the 44 mag.

The Rossi 92 in 454 with full power loads also has about twice the recoil of the milder 44 mag, because the Rossi weighs under 6 pounds. These are guns made for bear defense, shooting hogs and deer or bear in deep cover, and not much else.

However, the 454 will fire any 45 Colt 45 Cowboy Special, a new shorter case to match 45 acp power, and the 45 Schofield rounds. The 454 lever gun will not fire the 45 rimmed cartridge, because that older round has a much thicker rim, and a smaller case. That said the 454 chamber is like the 357 chamber that accepts the 38 special 38 long Colt and 38 Short Colt, the difference being case length and lessor power levels.

Bottom line, in the big bores the 454 is the most versatile.

44 mag, I love the 44 mag and have handguns with barrels of 2.5, 4 and 5.5. In a lever gun, the 44 mg is wonderful if you do not reload, that lets you shoot the full power, 44 special and 44 Russian, which you can buy off the shelf.

45-70 and others. A comment was made about power levels. The 44 mag is the baseline for handguns, power is set at 36 K psi or so. In the 45 Colt some guns like the bigger Rugers can be loaded to 32Kpsi which allows them to equal or exceed the velocity of equal weight bullets in the 44 mag. When you fire them in rifles the power will rise maybe 40%, making them 100-125 yard deer guns.

The 45-70 is a different animal as is the 454 rifle. Those two can be loaded with 300 grain bullets to equal velocities which is 1,800-2,000fps, which is over 2,600 fpe, plenty for any animal. And that speed makes them a 200 yard deer gun, note the chart below, starting at over 2,600 fpe and still nearly 1,000 fpe at 200 yards.
1757879641119.webp

There 454 Casul data is identical, making those two realistic 200 yard guns.

Now sight in your 44 mag lever gun again, 2 inches high at 100 yards and here is the best you can hope for. The 150 yard shot is fine, except you only have 700 fpe whereas your 45-70 or 454 at that range would have 1,259 fpe, so your 44 mag has about half the power at 150 yards as the 45-70 or 454.

1757879869352.webp

Simple physics, just decide how much power you really need. I love the 45-70, the 454 and firing the hotter Ruger only loads in the 454, but knowing they are half power, like the 44 mag, but also half the recoil..

Bottom line.....I advise everyone to choose the 337 lever gun first unless the actually live in Alaska or in real bear county. The power is above 44 mag handgun loads, cheap and ammo is everywhere.

And brand does not matter. If you want the 454 you must get the Rossi model 92. If you settle for lesser power, any brand will do. The Henrys weigh a little more but are slick. The new Smith and Wessens look great. Several new offshore companies are now selling 357 lever guns and reviews are looking good.

Hope this helps. If you really need the power, go with the 45-70 or the Rossi 454, If not, buy the 44 mg if you do not reload. If you reload, but the 45 Colt.

Or if you just want a powerful lever, buy the 357. More power than you will ever need, I have had 4 of them, just saying.
 
Venom ballistics,
Yeah 45 colt just isn't an urban edc, or home defense round or end of the world round for me. 9mm and 223 for that. So none of those concerns are really anything i consider with the 45 colt round. 45 colt is a woods carry, hunting, and range fun round. And developing all the different loads for those kinds of applications makes it really fun.
And I've loaded and shot my whole life and never had a problem mixing up loads for wrong guns. Maybe I'm more organized than others. I don't know. But its just never been an issue.
I load the 45 Colt Ruger only loads that I shoot in the Bisely full size Blackhawk, a great gun and great round. I also shoot that load in the 454 level gun by Rossi, a moderate load in that gun but equal to the 44 mag.

For the Ruger only loads, I use jacketed bullets always. I also own the 45 Colt in a Ruger flat top the small frame of Colt Peacemaker size, a Uberti Colt clone and a Smith and Wesson Governor, none of which are safe with the Ruger onlyloads. So, when I reload for those, I simply use cast bullets.

At the velocity that the standard pressure loads reach in handguns, they are not going to expand, so whether they are cast of jacketed really does not matter.

So, when I see 45 Colt if it is jacketed, I know it it s 44 mag equivalent load and if cast, I know I can shoot it in anything. And I do mark every box.. Never a problem.

If I did want to maximize the power of say the Governor, I would simply buy the Buffalo Bore standard pressure load. And just a few for those certain times. But like most, if I need more power, I have bigger guns.
 
If your looking for versatility, imo i would have to say that the s&w 460 mag has them all beat especially if you reload.

460 loads out to 200 yards, i use 250 gr jfp
Opt 454
45 lc , 250 gr jfp using anywhere from cowboy loads to t/e loads. T/e loads while hot you still don't get much recoil in the xframe.
Opt 45 Schofield

Waiting for a rail and pistol scope to come in, the irons do quite nicely on their own though.

20250701_182138.webp
 
Back
Top