Talan2000
Member
Hi all,
I just purchased, somewhat impulsively shall we say, a used 625-8 JM on GB.
Anyway, I haven't received it yet, but I noted somewhat belatedly (face palm) that it does not have the factory sights installed. Nor JM grips (which I did notice and am happy about except for not being able to sell them- wonder what they are worth?).
Instead, the rear sight has been replaced. Maybe that's going to be just perfect and my target loads will be perfectly zeroed with it... Maybe not.
1. So I was curious what you more experienced folks (with the 625 or others), might have to say about what I would need to get this back to the original/factory adjustable sight from what appears to be a fixed rear sight.
Would this just be a matter of buying a $12 blade/screw at midway or is there something I'm missing. And if so, presuming the gun has the stock (.300 Front gold bead sight), what is the proper (or at least standard factory) rear sight height/width?
Smith & Wesson Rear Sight Blade Kit K L N-Frame .146 Blue Blade
2. Anyone recognize the installed rear sight -- it has a rounded notch for example. I'd like to learn about them before making any changes. It seems pretty substantial (ie thick and not cheap metal like the stock S&W replacements look). And of course fingers crossed that they are some super premium piece of gear
3. This gun will be a range toy for me, not a game gun, so I can learn to work with just about any sight option so long as it will be consistent and ideally POA=POI.
As an aside, from looking at a lot of these newer guns, it seems that S&Ws roll stamping is really hit or miss - looking sloppy and causing distortions/dents in the metal that I've never seen in the older guns. anybody else have this observation?
This one, isn't too bad but for example the "." in .45ACP seems too deep/sloppy and there is some distortion around the 4 & 5. Another gun in my watch list -- a PC version 625, had some weird distortion in the barrel too which kinda put me off it though the price sure looks nice...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Todd
I just purchased, somewhat impulsively shall we say, a used 625-8 JM on GB.
Anyway, I haven't received it yet, but I noted somewhat belatedly (face palm) that it does not have the factory sights installed. Nor JM grips (which I did notice and am happy about except for not being able to sell them- wonder what they are worth?).
Instead, the rear sight has been replaced. Maybe that's going to be just perfect and my target loads will be perfectly zeroed with it... Maybe not.



1. So I was curious what you more experienced folks (with the 625 or others), might have to say about what I would need to get this back to the original/factory adjustable sight from what appears to be a fixed rear sight.
Would this just be a matter of buying a $12 blade/screw at midway or is there something I'm missing. And if so, presuming the gun has the stock (.300 Front gold bead sight), what is the proper (or at least standard factory) rear sight height/width?
Smith & Wesson Rear Sight Blade Kit K L N-Frame .146 Blue Blade
2. Anyone recognize the installed rear sight -- it has a rounded notch for example. I'd like to learn about them before making any changes. It seems pretty substantial (ie thick and not cheap metal like the stock S&W replacements look). And of course fingers crossed that they are some super premium piece of gear


3. This gun will be a range toy for me, not a game gun, so I can learn to work with just about any sight option so long as it will be consistent and ideally POA=POI.
As an aside, from looking at a lot of these newer guns, it seems that S&Ws roll stamping is really hit or miss - looking sloppy and causing distortions/dents in the metal that I've never seen in the older guns. anybody else have this observation?

This one, isn't too bad but for example the "." in .45ACP seems too deep/sloppy and there is some distortion around the 4 & 5. Another gun in my watch list -- a PC version 625, had some weird distortion in the barrel too which kinda put me off it though the price sure looks nice...

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Todd
Last edited: