MakeMyNight
Member
Hodgdon manual #26 shows 13.5 gr HS-6 with a 240 gr jacketed bullet as giving 26,600 CUP, which is well below the 43,500 CUP the 44 mag was spec'd at by SAAMI when the manual was printed. That is their max load BTW with that powder.
Even the Speer #8 which is everyone's go to manual when they want to find hot loads that are supposedly safe because they are in a manual by a major manu, shows only 13.5 grains as max with HS-6 under a 240 jacketed bullet.
Looking thru some older reloading data and comparing with the poster's Speer Manual #8 above:
Speer Reloading manual #9 shows 12.5 grs HS6, magnum primer, with 240 grain bullet. HS6 not used for loads in 44 rifle cartridges in this manual.
Speer Reloading manual #11 shows a max of 16 grs HS6 with 240 gr projectile with a magnum primer, in 44 mag handgun cartridges.
Same HS6 charges are used in 240 gr 44 mag rifle cartridges in this manual.
Browsing through My 1971 Sierra Reloading manual, HS6 powder is not used in the loading data for for large magnum handgun cartridges.
Reading some of Ken Waters' late 1960's thru early 1970's reloading data, HS6 is not used for reloading large magnum cartridges.
What I'd like to know: Were the cartridges which damaged the firearm loaded on an auto type (Progressive) press, or were they assembled using a turret or other single stage press?
Practically every critically damaged handgun that I've been aware of, was damaged by loads assembled on an auto press.
IMO, auto-presses themselves are NOT the problem, rather lack of press and powder train maintenance seems to render the overcharge of the faulty ammo.
As other members have stated, I feel the reloader owes the forum member a sincere apology, plus a new handgun.
Last edited: