629 vs. 629 Mountain Gun

I have always been surprised that S&W has never made the Model 29 and 629 in the 4 inch, full underlug barrel version. They have done it in .45 ACP and 10mm, and I think a .44 Magnum benefits more from the extra weight of the full lug than .45 ACP ever would.
 
IMHO for all around use, you can't beat the 629MG. All the reasons are stated in previous posts
 

Attachments

  • DSC00637.JPG
    DSC00637.JPG
    123 KB · Views: 829
  • DSC00639.JPG
    DSC00639.JPG
    128.5 KB · Views: 904
  • DSC00638.JPG
    DSC00638.JPG
    129.3 KB · Views: 699
Last edited:
I have a 629 Mtn Gun, & the differences are small. That said, I would rather have the standard 4" 629.

Darrel
 
I have a 629-2 Mountain "Revolver" that is probably the most accurate S&W I've ever owned. I like it so well that I bought another Mountain Gun in case I ever wear out the first one.

I also have a 6 1/2 inch 629 Classic. It is easier to shoot well than the Mountain Guns and I use it for hog hunting, but it's considerably heavier the longer holster makes it unhandy to carry.

I bought a 5 inch 629 Classic, and it is a good compromise between the two.

Then I bought a 329PD and threw a wrench in the whole works.
 
A comprimise between the two could be, what I think I have, the 3 inch round but with the combat grips. I'm not sure of the dash designation but looks like a Lew Horton. I shot it last time I went shooting and didn't bring tears to my eyes and I was shooting hornady soft tips out of it. Doeboy
 
I am not sure that a heavier weight always means lighter felt recoil. I have both a 629-4 Mountain Gun and a 5 1/2 in Redhawk. At least for me the Smith is the easier of the two to shoot with factory 240's. even though the Redhawk weighs 9 1/2 ozs more than the 629. I think it is because of the grips. I have Hougs on the Redhawk and they are larger in size than the Houg/Smith grips. The smaller grips on the 629 allow my fingers to wrap around and really hold the gun firmly while the Redhawk just never seems quite right. The 629 is light enough that it doesn't pull my pants down slowly as I walk with it holstered and at 4in it can be hidden fairly well too. I vote for the Mountain Gun First and then get the other one later because you will want another, it can't be helped.
 
<I have always been surprised that S&W has never made the Model 29 and 629 in the 4 inch, full underlug barrel version. They have done it in .45 ACP and 10mm, and I think a .44 Magnum benefits more from the extra weight of the full lug than .45 ACP ever would.>

I could not agree more! I have a 610 with that full-lugged 4" barrel with an unfluted cylinder to boot. That thing is a tank. Not much effort required to keep the sights on the scoring rings in rapid DA fire with stout 10mm loads. My 629-4 MG does rock and roll shooting full power 240 gr. loads. That said, that particular MG would be my gun of choice, if I was limited to a single centerfire revolver.
 
I had a 629-2 unmarked that I assumed was an early "mountain revolver". I sold it when I found a MG in 45 Colt. I did carry the "mountain revolver" but never fired it. There are very few guns that I don't regret selling.
 
Shootability always depends on the grips. And what purpose will the revolver serve? There is no reason to have to endure "an extended range session" with a .44 Magnum. Rubber is more comfortable in terms of managing recoil but I don't like how it sticks to clothing. My 4" N Frames all wear Miculek grips. The 240 gr. Elmer Keith handload is as heavy as I'll ever go in my 629-2 MG. Recoil is severe, but I can manage it well enough that this is my most accurate field gun. I will never fire more than a few shots with it at any one time using this load, so I'm not intimidated by the recoil. For all reasons other than shooting big game, this revolver will live on .44 Special handloads. I think the Mountain Gun is just about perfect in terms of horsepower to weight ratio and within reason it is a very manageable platform.

Dave Sinko
 
I have had a 624--- 4 inch, a 629--- 4 inch and the 629 MG.

AS I don't shoot that many 44 Magnum full house rounds, the only one left in my stable is the 629 MG.
I could tell the difference in recoil, using full house loads, between the standard 629 4 inch and the 629 MG.

Using light/target loads in the .44 magnum cases or .44 special loads I couldn't tell the difference in the recoil.

FWIW the 624-- 4 incher and the 629 MG weighted the same on my postal scale.
 
For regular carry I'd go with the Mountain Gun (ok, I went with the MG). While it's only slightly lighter, the center of gravity is moved further to the rear giving the gun excellent balance. And the tapered barrel and shortened underlug is more suited to a holster. And, of course of critical importance, it looks good!
 
If ever there was a gun that was a candidate for Magnaporting,
the .44 Magnum Mountain gun is it. I have what I believe is the first issue Mountain gun, a 629-2 as well as 4" 624. The 629 is built better and may have better metallurgy. These guns came with a satin matte finish I happen to like and the markings are roll engraved. I took a hiatus from shooting for awhile but intend on working up some mid range loads for this
and my other .44's. Think 7.5 grains of Unique and a 240g SWCGC. One or three rounds of full house ammo to make sure
you are going to hit what you shoot at is probably enough in this gun. The picture is a before pic. When I get it back from Magnaport I will post another.

---
Nemo
 

Attachments

  • 4in 44mag Mountain R.JPG
    4in 44mag Mountain R.JPG
    174.7 KB · Views: 579
I prefer the 629 MG and don't care at all for the magna porting.
MountainGun003.jpg
 
629 in 4 inch is a dream to shoot

I had a friend send me load data for Solo 1000 for .44 mag & .44 special. It is clean burning and I use it all the time.
I have been shooting low powered hand loads with 240 gr lead round nose bullet for 20 years with great success in the 4 inch 629. When I load factory rounds or the high power ammo I hardly notice the differance until about the 12th shot. The point here is, I only load up the heavy stuff when out in the field or when it is needed. I mostly shoot this gun recreationally, as I suspect most people do on this forum.

The advice I can give you to offer to your friend is get one, what ever you can afford. I like the standard 4 inch w/o the full lug.

I have hand loaded every combination I could brew up for this gun and find at 25 meters it is all mostly the same. I put a scope on it for a while just to see how accurate this gun could be. Shot from a rest, shot from sitting, standing and every other ways I could think of. I switched to open sights and also tried a red-dot on this fine revolver. So, I went from the lowest load to settle on 7 gr Solo 1000 behind a 240 gr lead round nose bullet just because I have fine 7 grain pellets next to my bench. It is an easy reference for me. ( my favorite light load is 4.2 gr of solo behind the 240 gr LRN)

I started my boy on a daisy 717 which is about the same weight as the 4 inch 629. I have let my newbie nephews shoot the loaded down .44 ( and also my .45) with great results. It is just a blast to shoot and exciting to expose younger or inexperienced shooters to shooting the big bores. ( There ae braggin' rights to be had: "I shot a .44 magnum and it was way cool". We shoot paper, but rolling around a big coffee can is just plain fun. They mavel at the big raggedy holes in the cans and want to take it home as a trophy. I think I have turned more new shooters on to shooting by letting them shoot a real S&W .44 than any other gun. I was a 4H youth shooting instructor for a few years and about every kiddo and parent who got to shoot this gun remembers the experience.

I love this gun and so will your friend. Get him into reloading and he will save a ton of money on ammo, and be able to load the rounds to low recoil ammo ( we affectionately call powder-puff loads ) When starting out we don't talk too much about how un-manly these loads are. We just go and shoot and have fun. I only pull out the full power ammo when I wish or need to refamiliarize myself with the heavy rounds in this gun. But from the years of shooting this gun I have no hesitation or flinch when shooting the high power ammo because of so much practice with the powder-puff rounds. Both loads will knock down plates and both have about the same impact point at 25 meters. ( close enough to knock down a plate MHO that is as practical accuracy as it gets; for practical defensive shooting)

So good luck with your friend's choices but one last comment. He or any man will be proud to own a S&W 629 and will likely never regret the purchase. Especially if he learns to reload, saving money, shooting low recoil ammo and adding a whole new dimention to his shooting hobby.
 
Last edited:
I forgot to post a pic of the MR after porting it (and getting Herrett Trooper grips).
I am glad I ported it. The muzzle flip was greatly reduced.
The Troopers or the 500 grips handle the actual recoil just fine.
This is still the tightest S&W I own.

===
Nemo
 

Attachments

  • 629-Herretts-R-800.jpg
    629-Herretts-R-800.jpg
    175.7 KB · Views: 434
Back
Top