Been lurking around for a while and have learned a great deal about S&W revolvers.
I hope to hear your recommendations/experiences with owners of either or all as i'm choosing between these for my first S&W revolver. I own several semi-autos and for revolvers, I only have a Ruger LCR .38 which gets painful to shoot only after several rounds.
I'm not from the US and choices are extremely limited with very expensive selling prices so I can pick only one in the near future (plus the wife will get really upset). There are also no rentals to test so I'm buying purely based on research.
My dealer has the 686 SSR, 627PC in 2.625", and R8. The 627PC costs $150 more than the SSR while the R8 a whopping $700 more than the 627PC. Even if I can well afford any of them, I do not feel comfortable paying more than the 627PC’s asking price. My main reasons for wanting an S&W revolver are for collection and fun range shooting. Maybe a possible home defense option too although not the priority as I have other tools for that purpose.
Here are pros and cons I can think of so far (please chime in your comments)…
686SSR
+ probably sized just right and least expensive
- 6 rounds “only”
627PC
+ 8 rounds plus I like the moonclip option as I don’t have a gun that has this feature yet
- Unsure if 2.625” can tame the .357's recoil. Also some reviews are criticising snubnose performance on .357 rounds.
R8
+ same reasons as 627PC plus I like the tacticool look
- seems too expensive for what it is
If you have to choose only one, which would it be and why? (unfortunately, no other 686 and 627 variants are available)
Between the three, which is potentially more collectable and can hold its value better in your opinion?
Thanks everyone for the feedback!
I hope to hear your recommendations/experiences with owners of either or all as i'm choosing between these for my first S&W revolver. I own several semi-autos and for revolvers, I only have a Ruger LCR .38 which gets painful to shoot only after several rounds.
I'm not from the US and choices are extremely limited with very expensive selling prices so I can pick only one in the near future (plus the wife will get really upset). There are also no rentals to test so I'm buying purely based on research.
My dealer has the 686 SSR, 627PC in 2.625", and R8. The 627PC costs $150 more than the SSR while the R8 a whopping $700 more than the 627PC. Even if I can well afford any of them, I do not feel comfortable paying more than the 627PC’s asking price. My main reasons for wanting an S&W revolver are for collection and fun range shooting. Maybe a possible home defense option too although not the priority as I have other tools for that purpose.
Here are pros and cons I can think of so far (please chime in your comments)…
686SSR
+ probably sized just right and least expensive
- 6 rounds “only”
627PC
+ 8 rounds plus I like the moonclip option as I don’t have a gun that has this feature yet
- Unsure if 2.625” can tame the .357's recoil. Also some reviews are criticising snubnose performance on .357 rounds.
R8
+ same reasons as 627PC plus I like the tacticool look
- seems too expensive for what it is
If you have to choose only one, which would it be and why? (unfortunately, no other 686 and 627 variants are available)
Between the three, which is potentially more collectable and can hold its value better in your opinion?
Thanks everyone for the feedback!