69 vs 629

nksmfamjp

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
236
Reaction score
157
Location
Central OH
I’m looking for a 44 mag revolver that carries well on the chest. Adequate power for bear defense or deer hunting to 40 yards, and is fun to shoot.

I’d like to put a reflect optic on it…..Holosun going to hold up??

I’m a little concerned about the 69 due to the weight. The 629 is heavier, but will be harder to carry. I’d like a 5”, but would take a 4”.

I am thinking about moon clips, but not sure they are needed in a 44 mag. So, that is up in the air.

What good options are there for removing the lock? I fear it will lock somehow! Maybe unnecessary fear, but…

What do you suggest based on your experience?

Planning to sell a 547 and maybe a m&p tan 5” 40 s&w to get this…I’d better get hot!
 
Register to hide this ad
You don't need moon clips.

The 69 is a five shot versus the 6 shot 629.

In a chest rig, the weight difference may not make a difference in carrying but the heavier 629 will definitely be easier to handle if you are shooting full power loads.
 
Well, you guys are not selling the 69 as well as Spomer and VonBenedict did, but I’m a shooter. I don’t mind backing off max pressure, but I need to be close like 240gr XTP at 1300fps.

I also like the thought of no lock. Maybe i can find one. If it has a lock, are they recoil proof?
 
I've got a 2.75 inch 69, as well as a few 629's in various barrel lengths. On the hip, the 69 is a great woods carry gun. But, it does recoil with full power loads. The heavier 629's kick, but a little less. Good rubber grips that fit your hand reduce felt recoil in both models.

Being that you intend to use a chest rig, weight / length is not as big a factor, and I would probably go with a 629 for the recoil reduction and extra shot.

I own 4 S&W magnum revolvers with the lock, and it has not been an issue. There are several folks making a lock delete, including at least one forum member who markets "the plug". If you decide to go the no lock route, the 629 dash 3 & 4 guns are a good bet, as they have no lock, forged parts, the endurance package, and are D&T for optic mounts.

That 240 grain XTP at about 1300 fps is my favorite whitetail load out of my revolvers, and does have a bit of recoil. For general woods bumming around, I usually carry a hard cast WFN bullet loaded to about 1000 fps. Recoil & controllability is good, and it will penetrate deep with very good killing power.

Larry
 
Last edited:
I have a 2.75" M69 that I plan on dumping for a M629. The M69 reminds me of a 357 J-frame as in it's good for shooting the occasion magnum, but it's really better off for shooting a study diet of special (44 spc).

As others pointed out, the weight should be okay with a chest rig, recoil will be less, you get one more round, the barrel on the 627 in one peice and not two pieces like the M69, and the frame, cylinder, etc is more robust with the M627.
 
I myself am a fan of the N frame over the L frame 69. If you're carrying for protection, you might as well take the bit of extra weight for another shot and less recoil.

When carried on a chest holster, the difference is negligible. For me, the X frames take their toll a bit quicker, but...that might just be cause I'm getting older, fatter and weaker.

The earlier locks on the 329s DID have some issues, albeit rare. I can testify to this because I once owned one second hand with the factory repair note detailing it. The original owner could not get past the incident and was trading it for a steel frame revolver. Your fears are not entirely unfounded, but they are very unlikely. If you're in the mood to assuage modern S&W fears, I'd also add a good extra length firing pin, as I've had a couple that were unreliable due to them being too short for the intent of passing some insane California ten story building drop test or some such.

Either TK Custom or Original Precision make a nice plug to replace the lock. It's a pretty easy swap. Another option is to take the lock out and get a Tromix cylinder release that covers the hole. In any case, that's easy to deal with.

I barely tolerate red dots. I have my doubts about them, but that's not what you asked about.

I've never ran a dot on a magnum revolver, but I've ran some on 10mm autos and not found issue. My current favorite is in fact a Holosun 507. My state agency just cleared red dots for officer carry. Holosun is one of them. Two others are Trijicon and Aimpoint. This is new territory for the state of Alaska, and they wouldn't allow Holosun if they hadn't done their homework and double checked. I think the odds are in your favor, but again...I'm a far stretch from a red dog genius myself.

dlsports.com has a really nice looking mount. (Really nice looking everything, actually) but I have no direct experience.

I myself am an absolute lover of moonclips, but they do come at the cost of fragility that can tie your revolver up pretty ugly. The way I maintain moonclips for defensive purpose is be having designated ones for defense that are basically inspected, unused, loaded with my preferred ammo, and left alone. I also carry moonclips in a rigid pouch. Mine is a Safariland double pouch. I keep a pair of latex gloves in the bottom to push the moon clips higher up and grant quicker access. I run .45 ACP moonclips that run about $1 each, so I have over a hundred of them. I also run .357 mag moonclips that are $7-$8 each. I don't have nearly as many of them. I've never looked at .44 mag moon clips, but I got a feeling they ain't the cheap ones. Many folks complain about them being picky with brass, but I have a pair of vise grips and a couple de-mooning tools that say otherwise.

a Mountain Gun configuration is one of my favorites like the other guy. They just hit a perfect point of balance between portability and shootability. Having said that I like 'em all, including the 329s.
 
Depends on whether you want 5 shots or 6.

That's really the only meaningful difference. Some will say that the 629 is more robust because it's an N-Frame vs an L-Frame, but I doubt that anyone has ever worn out a 69.
 
Are there bears in Ohio? Apparently a few since they are listed as endangered… The 69 is a 5 shot and the 629 is a 6 shot. Moon clips on a 44? Just a fad - when a speed loader can do the same thing and cost a lot less without modification to the gun. Why do you need 1300 fps? At the effective range of a hunting handgun 800 - 1000 fps is surely adequate. Besides, when the bullet exits the other side of your target, it accomplishes nothing else… Just my take on your questions. I have a 4.25” 69 and a 5” 629 and carry both in a chest holster when hunting.
 
Depends on whether you want 5 shots or 6.

That's really the only meaningful difference. Some will say that the 629 is more robust because it's an N-Frame vs an L-Frame, but I doubt that anyone has ever worn out a 69.

I doubt anyone has shot a study diet of 44mag through one to know it's limitations especially being that it has a 2 peice barrel.
 
You’ve got a lot of questions. :D I’ll make it short. I’d buy the 629. In a chest holster, I don’t think the difference between the 69 and 629 would bother even me. I wouldn’t give the lock a second thought.

If you want to save your hand a bit, a 240-250 at 1200 FPS will probably do anything you’ll ever need to do with a .44 Magnum revolver, and your gun will probably last a bit longer, too. With a heavier bullet, 275-280 grain range, 1100 FPS will do.

If you can find the 5-inch gun with the Python-type barrel (so called “Classic” model) you’ll probably notice it’s a lot more comfortable gun to fire than the standard barrel in 4-inch.
 
In my opinion, it's six or one, half a dozen of the other. Either the 69 or 629 work fine. I like the 69 since it's a tad lighter to carry, I don't find the recoil too bad, but that's subjective. I wouldn't want to put several hundred rounds a day through either one, but for hunting or defense, it's not an issue for me. I still have the lock in my 69, but they're easy to remove it you prefer it not being there.
 
My 69 with the 4” tube carry’s nice and shoots well. Recoil with full boat Mag’s is NOT fun. For hunting I use a much longer tube (manga ported 7.5” Super Blackhawk ). Easier to get the velocity and accuracy with the longer tube (at least for me). I see my 69 more as a defensive woods gun. Ymmv
 
Back
Top