Yes, sorry for the thread drift. It's those British revolvers featured in this thread that caused it.
Even Dr. Watson had his "Old Army Revolver." This thought surely provided inspiration for acquisition of a British "Army revolver" or two of my own.
Hah! Great minds ...
"The Hound of the Baskervilles" in a flimsy paperback edition borrowed from a cousin, represented my initial exposure to Sherlock Holmes when I was 12.
There. In the corner. My beloved set given me by Mrs. BMc back in early marriage and read on an 18-month to 2-year cycle ever since. It is the best of all for the Sherlock Holmes fan. Last read it around Christmas of last year.
Bryan-
I've agonized over what Watson's "service revolver" might be. British officers bought their own sidearms, and could carry anything, not just the official pattern. They were supposed to chamber the issue cartridges, but that was often ignored.
Garry James did a nice article on Holmes guns in G&A, years ago. In deciding what to picture if I read a Holmes book, I looked at the probable time that Dr. Watson retired and where he served, inc. Afghanistan, I think.
I'm not sure when the first Holmes story was set. Sometime in the 1880's, I think? That rules out a lot of possibilities.
I finally decided on either a MK II Adams .450 or a Webley-Pryse in .455 or .476. The .476 Enfield was too big to carry around later in London and was not well liked. Good ctg., bad gun.
Watson was a doctor and would know about the need for stopping power in fighting savage tribes in British colonies then. He may have treated spear and sword wounds in troops injured when a revolver failed to stop an Ashanti or Zulu warrior or a Fuzzie-Wuzzie or Pathan, Afghan, etc. He'd know the limitations of the .450 ctg.!
I think he was too late to have carried a Webley-Kaufman unless he bought it just before retiring.
Again, there's a size issue if he carried it in London, probably in a coat pocket. I doubt that Doyle even thought about that issue.
As for Holmes, Garry James thought he'd have a No. 2 Webley .450, then the London cop gun, I think. Going by memory on his article, BTW.
Makes sense, but I like the looks of the 1883 version of the RIC series. That's a nice looking gun of that sort, and offers a better handle shape over the other.
I think it was absurd that Holmes would practice shooting in "his rooms." Doyle knew VERY little of guns, and would have no idea of the penetration of a bullet, the noise aspect, or the effect of black powder fumes in an enclosed room.
I also gravely doubt that a Russell's viper/Tic Palonga snake could be trained to crawl into a room through the ventilation system to get a dish of milk. I enjoyed, the Speckled Band, but don't respect his research. My favorite Holmes tales were the one where the guy was taking ape genes to climb well and, The Hound of the Baskervilles, which was at least plausible. I sometimes speculate on which guns I'd have with me if I assisted Holmes and Watson in pursuing that big dog.
I think my revolvers would be Colt SAA .45's, one with the original 7.5-inch barrel. A spare, maybe at times worn under a coat, would have the 4.75-inch bbl. Rifles? Maybe a Winchester .45-90 M-1886. If the story was set late enough, a .303 might be feasible, with softpoint hunting loads, or a .275 Rigby.
One big advantage, The Lost World TV show had over the book is that it was printed in 1912, and setting the TV show from 1919-1922 is that several better guns were more available.