But I just recently finished all three volumes of the biography of Sir Bernard Montgomery (Monty
Les, I'm a George Smith Patton guy.
But I just recently finished all three volumes of the biography of Sir Bernard Montgomery (Monty
Les, I'm a George Smith Patton guy.
Well, me too. In fact that's what led me too Monty. I have read numerous books about Patton, always had great admiration for his leadership style, but was struck by the way that the movie "Patton" showed GSP always at loggerheads with Monty, so I thought I should learn a little about Monty.
Nigel Hamilton, the author of the three volume biography, had unlimited access to Monty's papers and effects, and had many opportunities to meet with and interview Monty before his death. I have also obtained Monty's autobiography, written by him entirely with pencil and paper and typed by secretaries inter his supervision. After extensive research into the supposed rivalry between these two men, I can only conclude that they, in their very different ways, we're both great men. Each had flaws, of course, but each had great leadership qualities, each was equally flamboyant and egocentric, and each was capable of instilling great loyalty in his men. I also don't think that either fully understood the other, and could never see the value of the others vision. If these two men had been able to cooperate better, they might have shaved a year off of the European conflict.
At any rate, I highly recommend these three volumes to your attention. My picture of Monty before was largely that of the movie Patton. He certainly had his flaws, but was great in his own way.
Best Regards, Les
I'm not sure if I can post a link to see a whole movie here, so go to YouTube anD LOOK FOR A FILM FROM ABOUT 1960 CALleD, "fLAME oVER India". I JUst SAW IT THERE, AND YOU GET THE ENTRE FILM.
iT' S ONE OF THE BEST FOR SEEING Webley REVOLVERS AND Enfield RIFLES.
kEEP IN MIND THAT IT'S SET IN 1905. I GUESS THE RIFLES ARE MEANT TO BE smle nO. 1 mk i'S, ALThOUgH I BET Indian TROOPS THEN HAD MORE LONG LE'S. bUT LOOK AT THE RIFLES CARRIED BY THE EXTAS. SOME SOLDIers have No. 4 rifles! I think these men were real Indian soldiers, and carried what they had.
Sorry for the messy post . I'm up all night and going to bed. No time to re-type when the BLEEPING Caps Lock comes on. I look down to type and by the time I see the result, it takes forever to re-type. Sometimes, my patience fails.
Look carefully at the Captain's Webley (s) One is def. a MK VI, but I think I saw a different one in a scene or two. Look also for the old Maxim gun on the train. I think the barrel jacket is brass.
The officer couldn't have had a MK VI in 1905, as it wasn't made until ten years later. But Webley was then making an Army Model that looked a lot like a MK VI except for the front sight being like on a MK IV. The Wilkinson-Webley Model of 1905 had just come out, and it looked a lot like a MK VI. Could he have just bought a brand new one? Maybe. I'm sure the film people did the best they could.
You guys who bought the Boothroyd book can find Webleys of that day therein.
If you watch, "Flame Over India", let me know if you like it. It has a good cast, inc, Kenneth More and Lauren Bacall and Herbert Lom. I liked it so well that I bought the DVD. It was in theaters when I was a teen and I first saw it then.
Here's Genrral Gavin's jump suit at the West Point museum. I think it says something abou the man; a completely GI jump suit, just like any other paratrooper, but worn with two stars.
Yeah, me too, watching through my Roku box, streaming to the hi-def tv. Bunch of old timers, sitting around watching movies made when we were teenagers, about guns that were made before we were born, on technology that is cutting edge. Here's a screen shot taken on my iPad from 37 min and 47 seconds into the movie. Webley MK VI?
![]()
Ain't life grand??? It's raining here at the cabin, and there's a wild tom turkey about 20 feet away, earring the seed that the birds knock out of the feeder.
Les-
Thanks so much for posting that! It's a really good film. The ladies here may like the developing romance between the captain and the little Indian prince's governess, an American lady. (Lauren Bacall).
Watch sharply, and you may see that MK VI transform itself into either a MK I or maybe a Webley-Green in one or two scenes. Look for the added frame length ahead of the trigger guard.
You are wise to load down your shaved MK VI. The .45ACP at normal pressure operates at more than PROOF pressures for .455 revolver. (There was also a .455 Webley auto, and some 1911 Colts were also chambered for that round. Over 10,000 were sold to Britain in WWI, mainly for the RFC/RAF and the Royal Navy . The Royal Flying Corps became the Royal AF in 1918.)
I read Montgomery's autobiography as a teen. He had his good points, and I enjoyed the part where he told of officers being sent to have their swords sharpened in 1914. But Monty seemed unarmed in all WWII pics. Patton was the reverse. I preferred Patton's attitude on that score. I don't like the trend for US generals to look unarmed, even in combat zones.
In Vietnam, Westmoreland wore his famous ivory -handled Randall knife, and I think had a .45 on his other side.
But as British generals went, look at Field Marshal Lord Slim, Viscount Slim of Burma. With relatively modest numbers of troops and supplies, Sir Wm. Slim recaptured Burma from the Japanese. As a general, he was better than Monty. He just didn't get as much press coverage. Orde Wingate was also a skilled leader, especially brilliant in his use of special operations troops. But he died too early in a plane crash. Look for a photo of him with a No. 4 rifle on his sling, about to board a plane. The only other picture I've seen of a general carrying a rifle into battle is of US paratroop general Gavin.
He also wore a .45 and a Randall Model 1 knife.