- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,660
- Reaction score
- 21,325
It's difficult for me to imagine the miss-stamped models being stamped on the frame with "25-2"!
Here's why.
In a letter I recently received from Roy Jinks, he says the miss-stamping occurred in Sep. 1976 on 1000 of the Model 25s. Then, in a paragraph immediately prior to the one just described, he says
"In 1977, S&W began offering the Model 25 in .45 Colt caliber. This meant that the same model was available in two different calibers. The designation Model 25-2 became important as it indicated the revolver was manufactured in the .45 ACP cartridge. Whereas designation Model 25-5 indicated the revolver was chambered for the .45 Colt cartridge."
If what I've quoted is actually accurate, then why would S&W stamp a Model 25 with "25-2" in Sep. 1976 -- BEFORE the introduction of the .45 Colt version of the model, since it was the introduction of the additional caliber that led to the need for the different stamping (in this case 25-2).
If I'm understanding Roy correctly, the need for the designation "25-2" only arose AFTER the introduction of the Model 25 in the .45 Colt caliber -- prior to that introduction, the "25-2" designation would presumably have no purpose unless there was something else requiring a distinction to be made between Model 25s other than the caliber.
When you say the miss-stamped model are stamped "25-2" -- are you simply reporting commonly held beliefs OR did you actually see a miss-stamped Model 25 with the "25-2" stamped on the frame?
The model 25-2 (.45 ACP) and 25-5 (.45 Colt) were made concurrently; the -5 did not replace the -2.