Cdog
Member
I did a search and basically found most people seeing nice clean shooting results with TB.
I have a couple of 9 oz bottles that I bought some time ago for .38 Special Cowboy Action velocities from my Vaquero.
I didn't have good results, so it was pushed aside for Universal/Unique burn rate powders instead.
The problem is I don't remember why I didn't like it in my .38 Special trials.
I now have a 3rd generation Colt SAA chambered in .45 Colt.
The revolver shoots quite well with some loads I had from 2016 when I had another Vaquero in .45. They consisted of 7.5 grains of Universal behind a 250 grain Silver Bullet RNFP. Just a much higher velocity load than I desire.
Any of you that use reduced loads of Unique/Universal powders know the efficiency of burn declines and you end up with remaining flakes, smutting, etc.
I don't like cavernous cartridge cases with only a dusting of powder so I decided to try the Trail Boss again. I really like how it meters and the much higher load density.
Using otherwise the same components I loaded two batches to compare over the weekend. The ones on the right are typical of the Universal load of 6.0 grains. I believe 6.5 is suggested starting point, but again I'm looking for low velocity loads. I expect a certain level of smut from the reduced load with Universal.
The ones on the left are typical of the 5.0 grain middle of the road data wise of Trail Boss. I wasn't expecting anywhere near this level of smutting. I think I may have discovered why I didn't continue use of TB with the .38 loads.
As you can imagine the revolver was filthy. The accuracy is excellent with both loads. The POI is hardly affected at the 40 to 50 feet distance I usually shoot.
I have since loaded 12 more using 5.5 grains of TB and used a slightly heavier crimp. Yet to test.
Any advice and experience shared is welcomed!
I have a couple of 9 oz bottles that I bought some time ago for .38 Special Cowboy Action velocities from my Vaquero.
I didn't have good results, so it was pushed aside for Universal/Unique burn rate powders instead.
The problem is I don't remember why I didn't like it in my .38 Special trials.
I now have a 3rd generation Colt SAA chambered in .45 Colt.
The revolver shoots quite well with some loads I had from 2016 when I had another Vaquero in .45. They consisted of 7.5 grains of Universal behind a 250 grain Silver Bullet RNFP. Just a much higher velocity load than I desire.
Any of you that use reduced loads of Unique/Universal powders know the efficiency of burn declines and you end up with remaining flakes, smutting, etc.
I don't like cavernous cartridge cases with only a dusting of powder so I decided to try the Trail Boss again. I really like how it meters and the much higher load density.
Using otherwise the same components I loaded two batches to compare over the weekend. The ones on the right are typical of the Universal load of 6.0 grains. I believe 6.5 is suggested starting point, but again I'm looking for low velocity loads. I expect a certain level of smut from the reduced load with Universal.
The ones on the left are typical of the 5.0 grain middle of the road data wise of Trail Boss. I wasn't expecting anywhere near this level of smutting. I think I may have discovered why I didn't continue use of TB with the .38 loads.
As you can imagine the revolver was filthy. The accuracy is excellent with both loads. The POI is hardly affected at the 40 to 50 feet distance I usually shoot.
I have since loaded 12 more using 5.5 grains of TB and used a slightly heavier crimp. Yet to test.
Any advice and experience shared is welcomed!