ANOTHER ASSASINATION TRY ON TRUMP

Governors can say anything - doesn't mean they are correct......

That is a fact. However, our Governor is pretty expert at spotting incompetence of the Feds and has volunteered the resources of the State of Florida to assist the FumbleBumbleInc to reach some sort of "enlightenment." We can certainly afford it due to excellent financial management by the DeSantis team. Joe
 
CNN reported Monday the rifle was "an AK-47-like" firearm, not
necessarily a garden variety version of the gun. The press will probably just wisely leave it at that.
 
That is a fact. However, our Governor is pretty expert at spotting incompetence of the Feds and has volunteered the resources of the State of Florida to assist the FumbleBumbleInc to reach some sort of "enlightenment." We can certainly afford it due to excellent financial management by the DeSantis team. Joe

And it gains him what he thinks is a lot of good press. He seems to be vying with the sheriff who keeps showing up on TV.
 
As to the perp's weapon I have heard, AK, SKS, Dragunov. The Sherriff said it was an SKS. Amazing.
 
?
I'm guessing The Agent did not run toward the rifle. Just wet his pants, pulled his pistol, and emptied it into the ether. SS has some explaining to do. Again.

I believe four shots were fired by.the agent. But give the guy some slack, not everyone is as brave as the worthies on a gun forum.

As to an initial charges on gun violations, that's so the Feds can hold him until much more serious charges are filed. That's how it works. Didn't you know that?
 
Last edited:
Have read articles that said it was a SKS, but no accompanying pictures to confirm, at least none that I have seen.

There is a grotty picture of the stuff next to the fence. The SKS is in a plastic stock (looks like a RAMLINE) and has been fitted with an extended magazine. I thought at first it might be a 20" Saiga, but comparing some pictures it is definitely an SKS, not an AK.
 
Ostensibly, DHS in conjunction with DOJ (and various state and local agencies), has been directed to insure election integrity. I keep hearing of major manpower shortages though, so I don't know how well this task will be accomplished.

Only need a few foxes in the hen house.
 
I believe four shots were fired by.the agent. But give the guy some slack, not everyone is as brave as the worthies on a gun forum.

As to an initial charges on gun violations, that's so the Feds can hold him until much more serious charges are filed. That's how it works. Didn't you know that?

NO SHOTS should have been fired by the agent. He had no reason to shoot. He should have gotten on the radio and said, "We've got a hot one," giving location and then perp gets surrounded and captured.

Cirrusly, "he" sees a rifle barrel so he starts shooting ?!?! It's clownish.
 
Question. How did shooter guy know Trump would be there?

It was a reasonable and logical deduction, based on Trump's patterns of behavior. It's his golf club, his home of record is nearby, and he loves to play golf. It wouldn't be too hard to guess that on a Sunday with no campaign events scheduled, he wouldn't be sitting around the pool at Mar-A-Lago...

Could there be a mole in the Secret Service

No.

The US Secret Service is the oldest (by far) federal law enforcement agency, having been founded by President Lincoln in 1865, and in all that time, they have never had a renegade, traitor, turncoat, or spy in their ranks. Everybody else has dealt with those issues from time to time, but not the Secret Service.

Their vetting process is extremely thorough and selective, the toughest in the federal government. You can become a Special Agent for the FBI...DEA...ATF...HSI...or any of the other law enforcement agencies in Uncle Sam's Rolodex...easier than you become a Secret Service agent.

Have there been instances of personal misconduct from time to time with individual members of the USSS? Have there been lapses in performance? Yes, and those have been publicly dealt with, and appropriate corrections made. But there is no systemic problem or issue with that agency...they are the finest in the world at what they do.

No, there is no "mole" at the US Secret Service.

Hard to trust any of the alphabet agencies these days.

Rudi, with all due respect, unless you have firsthand knowledge of all of those alphabet agencies, your comment tells us only where you get your news. On what basis do you distrust those agencies? I've raised this issue on here before: How do we know what we know? Who tells us what we ultimately come to believe?

Every single day, many thousands of men and women across this country work to protect us and ensure our security. Some are very visible, many are not.

Some work with computers, some carry guns. Some of them work in offices behind many layers of security, while others are exposed to danger, in the open, every single day. Some work in major cities around the world, others in small towns and suburbs.

Many of them cannot talk about what they do, even with their spouses and families. When people ask what they do for a living, they reply simply that "I work for the government."

They're not political, and they have no mission beyond serving the country. I know that sounds hard to believe in our polarized society, where so many people see sinister conspiracies everywhere, but it's true. (Secret Service agents laughingly say "we don't elect 'em, we just protect 'em.")

The one thing they all have in common is the oath they take...

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
 
Last edited:
There have been some disparaging remarks about AK and SKS rifles and the 7.62x39mm cartridge. True, these things don't show up at Wimbledon, but they serve around the world.

Remember the final words of Major General John Sedgwick.
 
NO SHOTS should have been fired by the agent. He had no reason to shoot. He should have gotten on the radio and said, "We've got a hot one," giving location and then perp gets surrounded and captured.

Cirrusly, "he" sees a rifle barrel so he starts shooting ?!?! It's clownish.

First, you and I weren't there. But the rifle was apparently perceived as an immediate threat. Or should the agent waited to see if he would be fired upon? Pointing a rifle at a federal agent is a felony and deadly force is allowed. Other rules may apply among local police departments but this is federal.
 
"The US Secret Service is the oldest (by far) federal law enforcement agency, having been founded by President Lincoln in 1865"


Nah.

The US Marshals Service and the US Postal Inspection Service might dispute claims about who was the first or oldest Federal law enforcement agency.
Not even close.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top