ANOTHER ASSASINATION TRY ON TRUMP

.......USSS standards are very, very strict...no one else protects any designated protectee except Secret Service personnel. It's agency policy, that's all.

Hmmm, apparently they "became incontinent of bowel, not once but twice, whilst reclining in the nocturnal sheet based sleeping appliance." This hot off the pull; the "official FMA news service, all fact no fiction" report just out. Joe
 
I wonder how many agents are assigned to Trump each day,
every day of the week.

Is it enough that when he makes a last minute decision to go to his other golf course on a Sunday. Or do more agents immediately have to be called in.

Golf courses are particularly hard places to cover according to the SS. And Trump is an avid golfer, seemingly almost daily when not on the campaign trail. Does his lifestyle warrant many, many more agents than say a more sedentary protectee.

If you were the head of the SS, just how many agents is enough in your estimation and how should those agents be assigned on a full or standby basis, on call at a moments notice.

Usually a president has much less freedom of movement than a non president protectee and a president's schedule is a matter of daily record and forewarned updating.
 
That's not at all what I said, and you know it.

When I was in my fire service career, I always chuckled when people who were not in my profession, and who weren't qualified to do what I did, nevertheless took it upon themselves to woulda-coulda-shoulda us after an incident.

I imagine Secret Service agents reading this thread would have similar reactions...

It's called democracy. You should thank them for caring enough to speak up, then patiently explain what they are not understanding. Dismissing their comments us uninformed is
indeed suggesting the people not challenge authority, because "they aren't qualified." Being a citizen makes me qualified.
 
It's called democracy. You should thank them for caring enough to speak up, then patiently explain what they are not understanding. Dismissing their comments us uninformed is
indeed suggesting the people not challenge authority, because "they aren't qualified." Being a citizen makes me qualified.

My Oxford dictionary defines "democracy" as "a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives". Bystanders pretending to know more about a given topic than subject-matter experts in that field isn't "democracy"...it's just "arrogance"...

Since you know so much about what the USSS agents on site in Florida should have done the other day, why are you wasting your time debating on here? You should call or write the Secret Service, and offer to explain to them how to accomplish their mission better. I'm sure they would love to hear your advice...

Contact
 
My Oxford dictionary defines "democracy" as "a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives". Bystanders pretending to know more about a given topic than subject-matter experts in that field isn't "democracy"...it's just "arrogance"...

Since you know so much about what the USSS agents on site in Florida should have done the other day, why are you wasting your time debating on here? You should call or write the Secret Service, and offer to explain to them how to accomplish their mission better. I'm sure they would love to hear your advice...

Contact


So you never question your doctor? Just go along with whatever they say? Good luck with that.
 
You're presuming there is conflict with federal law, not state charges in addition to federal law.

Your explanation only applies if the state charges are somehow different than the federal charges. If charges are brought by both jurisdictions under substantially similar laws then the federal charges take precedence.

Also, you might get into legal issues if both jurisdictions attempt to try a defendant for the same crime. It's not called double-jeopardy, but I can't recall the term. I'm sure one of our local legal beagles can answer this better than I.
 
Ματθιας;142074197 said:
Here's what New Mexico Governor Lujan-Grisham said in 2023 as she banned firearms:

""No constitutional right, in my view, including my oath, is intended to be absolute..."

Seeing as you swore an oath to the US Constitution, you better go defend it from her!

Unfortunately for those who disagree with her, the law does agree. Every right granted to you by or from the US Constitution has two things that are attached to it at the hip: Restrictions and Responsibilities. No rights are absolute.

As the old saying goes: "Your right to swing your fist ends at my jaw!"
 
When Trump is in town he probably plays that course several times a week . They should know everything about that course and how to secure it . No excuse for what happened . SOMEBODY dropped the ball , or worse .
 
You guys are so consumed about the SS and whether what they did was right or not, BUT You are all missing the fact that an alert citizen took a picture of the accuseds vehicle AND the license plate of it. This is what allowed the quick arrest. How would this have turned out if not for the alert citizen?

Don't forget that what the police did with that information was a boss "Big Brother" move - they set every one of literally thousands of license plate readers (both fixed and mobile) to alert when the vehicle was spotted. That's how they located and caught him.
 
Your explanation only applies if the state charges are somehow different than the federal charges. If charges are brought by both jurisdictions under substantially similar laws then the federal charges take precedence.

Also, you might get into legal issues if both jurisdictions attempt to try a defendant for the same crime. It's not called double-jeopardy, but I can't recall the term. I'm sure one of our local legal beagles can answer this better than I.


The dual sovereignty doctrine says different.

State and federal governments are considered separate sovereigns and both can prosecute for the same crime.
 
Being a bodyguard in general and a SS agent specifically, I've read that it's not uncommon that the agent must follow his/her protectee into the restroom in public venues.

Can't be pleasant if an agent draws a protectee who is irregular.
Instead of a gun, the agent might have to carry air fresheners
and assorted toiletries to meet the client's needs.

Not sure that's any worse than the average LEO whose patrol
car is befouled by who know what while transporting a suspect.

Now back to the serious matter of assassins and what to do about them.
 
I have a former coworker/friend who is extremely upset over the recent 1.5 attempts on a former government employee; yet he is overjoyed with the numerous deaths and injuries caused by exploding pagers. When I pointed this out, he left in a huff.
 
Don't forget that what the police did with that information was a boss "Big Brother" move - they set every one of literally thousands of license plate readers (both fixed and mobile) to alert when the vehicle was spotted. That's how they located and caught him.

That pony left the barn a VERY long time ago. LE is not giving up that capability any day soon.
 
Back
Top