TexasRaider
Member
Your land, your rules.
Blast 'em outta the sky, man.
Blast 'em outta the sky, man.
Interesting. They could have been watching the children, (there are all kinds of videos on youtube of drones videoing girls in bikinis) casing a neighbors property, looking through windows, (ala peeping toms) and after the drone flies over his property, the dude shoots it down.
While reading the comments, all the drone owners want him prosecuted for it. But none of then commented on the actions of the operators, justifying it by claiming they "were just taking photo's" at someone else's request.
My view; If I come out and your drone is hovering over my granddaughter, you'll need a new one.
Like I said, I see guys take out 4" targets with "dove" loads at 65 yards every week. We even have one guy that does it with a modified choke. Really not that hard.Hell Yeah,
The guy was probably using an upland chocked shotgun, with dove loads.
.
.
Like I said, I see guys take out 4" targets with "dove" loads at 65 yards every week. We even have one guy that does it with a modified choke. Really not that hard.
Like I said, I see guys take out 4" targets with "dove" loads at 65 yards every week. We even have one guy that does it with a modified choke. Really not that hard.
I don't get the whole hatred of drones.
We forum members have a hobby that a lot of people want to ban.
I'm not a spy or pervert, I just like to fly.
We don't get much snow here in Georgia, but all of the neighbors wanted pics of their houses when we had a 6" snowfall earlier this year. Here's a "selfie" of me in my yard full of snow. There's nothing "spy worthy" in this shot at all.
Facts? You've been watching too much TV. An infrared camera cannot see inside your house.
They can't even see through glass:
I'm not so much surprised at all the bravado in this thread as I am at the people coming down on the other side of the fence and rationalizing an invasion of personal space/privacy. C'mon! Just because many people deliberately use cell phones and surf the Internet, expressly or implicitly allowing cell phone providers and app creators to track our movements and potentially control our mobile devices remotely, while willfully enabling tech companies to sell the data they collect on us for profit by virtue of our voluntary activities does not mean that we should simply accept without a fight that we now live in a world in which strangers feel entitled to eavesdrop or point their camera into our private lives.
The manner in which the "perpetrator" downed the pesky drone is a distraction (and anyway, it's not as if he shot the drone operator). The real issue is whether or not we still have a reasonable expectation of privacy from uninvited bipedal or aerial snoopers on our own property. If we shouldn't expect privacy in public, and can't expect privacy when we intentionally connect to the Internet or use our cell phones (or simply leave them on), we ought to at least have a defensible right against invasions of privacy on our own property! If we as a society place more value in the drone operator's expectation of entitlement than the property owner's expectation of privacy in a case like this, then we deserve what comes next.
*The news last night had a report of a drone looking into the bedroom window of a woman.
Police were called. No laws that they know of was broken.
What about a camera on the drone.