Another workaround

iby

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
1,221
No cylinder at all. 5 shots 22 rf
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200614_132208313_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20200614_132208313_HDR.jpg
    76.5 KB · Views: 70
  • IMG_20200614_131947165_HDR (1).jpg
    IMG_20200614_131947165_HDR (1).jpg
    68.1 KB · Views: 69
  • IMG_20200614_132239136_HDR (1).jpg
    IMG_20200614_132239136_HDR (1).jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 61
Register to hide this ad
Hi There,


No cylinder at all. 5 shots 22 rf


Technically, This isn't a work-a-round. The Rolland White patent
covered revolvers only: "Consisting in extending the chambers
through the rear of the cylinder for the purpose of loading them
at the breech from behind, either by hand or by a self-acting
charger from a magazine placed in rear of said cylinder,"

Rollin White and S&W did not bring suit against manufacturers
of single or multi barrel handguns or pepper boxes because they
don't use a "cylinder."


Cheers!
Webb
 
here are some examples of rollin white patent circumventions,

-Brooklyn slocum (Brooklyn Firearms Co ) 32 rf
-Moore ( Moore's Pat. Firearms Co. Brooklyn, Ny & National Arms Co. Brooklyn, Ny )
32 teat fire Frontloading
-Connecticut arms co (conn arms . co , norfolk , con ) 28 cup primed Frontloading
-Plant's manufacturing company (Merwin & Bray New York) 30 cup-primed Frontloading


sylvain
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 24
examples showing that the cylinders are not pierced all the way through
 

Attachments

  • 2  slocum.jpg
    2 slocum.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 16
  • 3 slocum.jpg
    3 slocum.jpg
    85.4 KB · Views: 16
  • 4 moore.jpg
    4 moore.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 16
  • 5 connecticut.jpg
    5 connecticut.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 15
  • 6 plant s.jpg
    6 plant s.jpg
    122.8 KB · Views: 14
Back
Top