Any negatives to buying a 686 no dash?

vytoland - Thank you very much for your time and the VERY helpful information. I am not going to bid on the no dash model and wait for the proper updated models. i think you just saved me a lot of grief-thanks.

This is a great forum and with great members!
I wouldn't worry about buying a no-dash 686, I have one and it has the "M" stamp denoting it has the recall work. Most 686s aren't affected and don't need the recall work done. It was mainly from on brand/weight ammo.
I'd get that 686!
 
The only downside I can think of is that I don’t have the cash to buy one.
 
I think any 686 in good condition will serve you well. I have a 686+ with a four inch barrel and lock and all that does everything asked of it just fine.
 

Attachments

  • 357M686jpeg.jpg
    357M686jpeg.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 14
I MUST agree, Sailfish. Here's my no-dash 2 1/2" after a free trip back to the factory. BTW--despite paperwork indicating the modification was done, there is NO "M" STAMP....


I'm certainly not a 686 historian, but a 7-shot no dash??
 
Last edited:
"Dashes,,,,,We don't need no stinkin' dashes. We don't need to show you no stinkin' dashes" My sincere apologies for butchering a classic movie line,,,,,

Anything "L" frame, anytime,,,, but these "no dashes" started it.

sIs667wl.jpg
 
It is negative for you to buy a 686 no dash as it is one less for me to get.
 
My CS-1

I was issued my CS-1 in 1988. Already M stamped. As a Customs supervisor I carried it from 1988-1993 when we went to 9mm semi-automatics. Mine was not turned in, rather re-assigned to a Customs special agent who carried it for several more years. I ultimately located it in 2000 and bought it. I can assure you that revolver has had many thousands of rounds through it of both 38+P and 357 mag. Performance was flawless. Nuff said!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top