Anybody Switch from N Frame to L Frame?

You got to get your mind right.
A 8 oz. Hammer doesn't feel right in the hand when looking to bust up a cinder block
A 20 oz hammer doesn't feel right in the hand when looking at driving a tack
Same with guns, it's how it feels when your shooting it, not sitting around playing with it.
 
L first then 2 Ns

Found a nice sample 581 first and stumbled upon a 28-2 and a 24-3. The L frame 581 with fixed sights was perfect for a crimson trace grip and balanced just right for me and my older eyes. My N frames are a joy to shot at targets with, but will back up the L frame.
 
As much as I love the L-frame, and I do love mine, I'm pretty much one and done with them and am focusing on K-frames.

I don't see my 686-4 going anywhere, but it will definitely be sharing safe shelf space with some of it's smaller, older brothers!

As far as N frames go...I'm a big fan of the .44 Magnum, and have a couple of those sitting around as well. I don't really have a need for a 357 N frame.
 
Last edited:
Just paid off my 629PC Snubbie Layaway at Buds, and my next Layaway will be a 627PC Snubbie. I had a 686+PC on Layaway, but cancelled it for the upcoming 627. The meager weight differential favored the 8 shot 627. Just my choice though...I’d like an L Frame, but my options are limited.
 
My opinion is that the N frame is best suited for 44 cal. I prefer L frame for .357 mag. But, in a duty weapon, open carried on a heavy duty belt, with really no consideration as to weight or concealment or efficiency of profile, I DO understand .357 mag in an N frame because it makes it ridiculously easy to manage and shoot rapidly and get rounds on target accurately. Hence the Highway Patrolman.
 
Only "L" frame I have now is a M 696 no lock.
I can shoot my "N" frame .44's better from the 1923 to the M 24-5.
I had a M 686 4" , just was not my cup of tea.....

Same here. I like the .357 cartridge just fine... But the .357 Magnum and even the.357 Sig are the only common handgun caliber(s) that I absolutely cannot shoot well; and never have in my 25 years of shooting. So I have accepted it and have foregone the caliber.

Thankfully, I shoot everything from .22lr to .44Magnum's well, very well actually. So my "N" frames are a 3" barreled M29 & a 3" barreled M629 with the lock deleted. They balance so well in the hand and while shooting that I've relegated my beloved 1911 commander to nightstand duty. A 3" barreled N frame carries well too, even better than the 4" barreled 1911 ever did.

I need a 2-3" barreled "L" frame though to try/compare between the N and L though!
nvLD2lW.jpg
 
Last edited:
I thought so. I know that J Edgar Hoover requested S&W make a stronger round for his agents that were shooting mostly .38 with I guess some .45 ACP. He wanted something that could penetrate the solid car doors of depression era gangsters and supposedly would crack an engin block on their getaway cars. I seem to recall the very first registered magnum with serial number 00001 was presented to him. It has never been recovered. Wonder where that gem is? Would be worth a fortune.

I have a signed letter from J Edgar to someone
 
IIRC...........................


N-frame early 20th century
.38/44 about 1932/33?
.357 magnum 1935
.44 magnum 1954/55 ?
L-frame 1980

IMHO the L-frame a 4" 686/681 is the best utility/duty .357 going..... grip frame and trigger reach of a k-frame and the strength of an N-frame
 
Last edited:
I carry a 32 auto...I holster a N frame. Ive found the N frame is perfect for me... Not that the others are bad...I just shoot the 28 better then any handgun I own.
 
I was 18 when I got my first pistol. 1968 to be exact. It was a 28-2 6"bbl. Traded it for a Browning Hi Power. Still have that. Love N frames. Have 2-28's, a 29classic DX, a 629, and 2 -57's coming. That being said, I have a small hand and like N frames for slow or long distance shooting. I have several K frames, and IMO, my all around best gun ever was a model 65-1 with target grips. That felt like an extension of my hand. I own one J frame, M60, not sure why, but it is going to go on the WTS soon. 2" guns are fine, but in a K frame
 
Just bought my first 357, a new production K-frame. With the light bullet limitations gone I went for the compact six shooter that still has enough mass to tame the recoil of full house magnum loads.
I downsized my 44 magnum from N to L.
 
Are you sure you got that right about the N frame being designed for the .44 Magnum. Wasn't the N frame introduced with the .357 Magnum years before they ever dreamed of the .44? I'm pretty sure the N frame was chosen for the .44 because it was robust enough but was originally for the .357.

The N frame was actually designed for .40+ standard pressure cartridges. The registered magnum came along after the the outdoorsman revolver in 38-44. The N frame was picked because it was stronger than military and police frame.
 
It's all a matter of what feels right for the individual person. For me, the N frame just feels better than a K or L frame gun. I have a good buddy that has a 686 no- and it is a fine weapon, but my model 27's just feel better in hand for me. I started off with a 5" 27-2 as my first pistol purchase back when I turned 18, so the N frame just "fits" me better. But now if a nice 686 came up at an absurdly low price I would snatch it up in a heartbeat.
 
Everybody has preferences. If we all liked the same thing we would not have all these wonderful Smiths to talk about.
For me an N frame is a great platform for any cartridge that starts with a 4.
I have a 696, but if I am not on a trail somewhere or at the ranch, I prefer my 629 for 44 spcl and 44 mag. But the 696 has its place and sees plenty of carry time in the field.
I have owned 4 N frame 357’s. A pre 27, 3 1/2”, a 27-2 5” that I never shot a 4” 27-2 and 1954 Highway Patrolman in 4”.
Mechanically, these were wonderful guns. I just found the bulk of the guns out of proportion the 357 cartridge.
My slippery slope with Smiths started with a 66-1 snub. Then a 19-4. These two guns defined what a 357 was for me before I ever shot an N frame 357.
Perhaps if I had started my 357 shooting with an N, my opinion would be different.
 
N Frames are great.

But my 4" 586-1 just feel and shoots like perfection for me.
 
Last edited:
I have an N, L, K, and J frame. I prefer the N frame grip the best. I know the L and K frame are supposed to have the same size grip frame, but the L feels a little bigger to me. They don't have the same grips, so that is probably the difference.

I don't consider the caliber to relevant - caliber shouldn't have any influence on ergonomics. I would get an N frame .22 if it existed.
 
I've never had to choose. I just buy another gun.

I don't care much for L or J frames though. The full length barrel underlug has more to do with that than anything. I just think that's ugly. I've got a Model 69, but that's the only L frame..

J's are just too small.
 
Glad we're all different in likes and dislikes, or it'd be a boring place.
For me, don't have and never intend to jump on the 'big snubbie' bandwagon. Have never seen a use for those that appealed to me.
Large (N) frames seem at their best in the 4" and above range.

If I desire a snub for carrying, it'll be a J or K frame something, not a grapefruit sized revolver with a short barrel.
To fill the niche of smallish .45, I will carry an Officer's Model LW M1911 3". Flat, compact, easy to carry.

So, my eschewing these big shorty's leaves all the more for you guys that love'em!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top