AWB introduced

Status
Not open for further replies.
Register to hide this ad
Stilt continues to show her ignorance. Of course, no mention of the armed citizen who stopped the Texas tragedy from being worse.
 
Pretty much all of the States already have laws on the books regarding firearms,ammo and capacity.I don't believe anything the Feds try to do can supersede State laws or Constitution.

This is just stirring the pot to keep it in the news.In 2009 the Dems controlled everything and a similar attempt only got 40 votes.

It all just means that we should remain vigilant and get out to vote in the 2018 midterms.
 
coltle6920 said:
Pretty much all of the States already have laws on the books regarding firearms,ammo and capacity..
Click to expand...

Not really. No firearm or magazine restrictions here in Pa. You can carry a belt fed handgun chambered in 30-06 (example). Most states don't have any restrictions. Only ones I know of are CO, NY, NJ, CA, MA, HI. I could be missing a few but if there's another 5 that would make it 11 out of 50 states

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 
Feinstein is not intelligent enough to draft legislation. I'm sure she is intelligent enough to accept drafts from anti-gun groups and present those as her own work product.

While mayor of San Francisco she did preside over several extremely restrictive gun control laws, and at one point actually surrendered her .22 target pistol on the same day she received her concealed carry permit for her .38 revolver. Apparently, in Feinstein's world gun control applies to everyone other than herself. Now that she is in national politics I'm sure she is constantly surrounded by armed security forces while pursuing her goal of disarming the unwashed masses.
 
AZretired said:
It's just for show so the Dems can claim they are trying to do something. It's not going anywhere.
Click to expand...

Right NOW, it's not going anywhere.

And I hope it NEVER goes anywhere.

But I also think it is some sort of ground work for the Dem/Gun Grabber agenda for when the day comes and they have 51 votes in the Senate.

They can re-introduce time and again and keep it in the forefront until circumstances are right.

I would be curious what the other sitting Senators will say in committee and on the floor. I am sure she will be on the receiving end of some priceless finger wagging, scolding, and humiliation...from REAL Americans.

Someone needs to give here a one way ticket back to her sanctuary city, deny her a visa back to America, and limit her First Amendment Free Speech rights just as she is wanting to limit 2A RKBA rights.
 
ladder13 said:
The first line of the Bill is telling. What the heck is “for other purposes”?
Click to expand...

It means exactly that! Whatever "they" deem necessary whenever "they feel like it.:rolleyes:

I always wondered how these bills get going? (not really, they just write them)
It seems that the wishes of the people whom the elected ones are supposed to represent would have to want this or any other bill? Where is it shown that the majority of people that they represent (I do not care what party) want this.??

To me it seems more of a this is what the Senator(s) want on their own??
 
Muss Muggins said:
Not here in the Show Me State. If they sell it, you can buy it and own it. We in Fly Over Country are great supporters of both capitalism and the Second Amendment. And personal freedom . . .
Click to expand...

Same here in Tennessee. If it ain't banned by the Feds you can buy it in Tennessee.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

dben002
AR-15 ban approved by SCOTUS
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
Rocketmedic40
R
Buford57
Illinois win - for now
Replies
5
Views
705
robertrwalsh
robertrwalsh
bushmaster1313
Incoherent Ruling on "Assault Weapons" in New Jersey
Replies
11
Views
1K
OutAtTheEdge
OutAtTheEdge
B
How stupid are we?
2 3
Replies
43
Views
3K
venomballistics
venomballistics
Gary Slider
Colorado, Iowa and South Dakota Updates
Replies
11
Views
1K
tominphx
T

Latest posts

Back
Top