bushmaster1313
Member
On July 30 the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued an Opinion and an Order regarding challenges to New Jersey's "Assault Weapons" Ban and the New Jersey ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
Opinion Here
IMHO the Opinion's ruling on "Assault Weapons" makes no sense as it rules that the "Colt AR15 Provision violates the Constitution but does not address semi-auto rifles with two evil features or guns just like the Colt AR15 but with a different name stamped on the receiver.
The ruling upholding the ban on so-called large capacity magazines is wrong, but it does make sense.
Please, I beg you, do not ask me to explain anything else about this dumb as bricks Opinion
The real question I have is this: Given that the two evil feature and substantially similar provisions still apply, what semi-auto rifles that were prohibited before this ruling are now allowed?
Opinion Here
IMHO the Opinion's ruling on "Assault Weapons" makes no sense as it rules that the "Colt AR15 Provision violates the Constitution but does not address semi-auto rifles with two evil features or guns just like the Colt AR15 but with a different name stamped on the receiver.
The ruling upholding the ban on so-called large capacity magazines is wrong, but it does make sense.
Please, I beg you, do not ask me to explain anything else about this dumb as bricks Opinion
The real question I have is this: Given that the two evil feature and substantially similar provisions still apply, what semi-auto rifles that were prohibited before this ruling are now allowed?
Last edited: