To the OP: If you are in NY or CA, you already have no choice or limited choice. If this is the gun you want to have, move someplace else.
On nomenclature, I tend to use the phrase "military style sporter." If I want to mess with the heads of gun control advocates who persist in calling them assault rifles despite the fact that they are not, I use the term "milcrips." That stands for "crippled military rifle," because a service rifle without selective fire capacity has been crippled. I guess you could also call them half-assault rifles, which permits an obvious contraction that would further offend those who are interested in making them seem as toxic and dangerous as possible, but sometimes you have to call something by an undistinguished name with the goal of increased understanding.
Abe Lincoln story: Lincoln is talking to his cabinet and no one is agreeing on what the situation is, let alone what to do about it.
Lincoln, frustrated, asks bluntly, "Gentlemen, how many legs does a horse have?"
The others agree on this, at least: "It has four, Mr. President."
Lincoln responds, "And if I call its tail a leg, how many legs does it have?"
"Why, five, Mr. President."
And Lincoln strikes: "Wrong! It has four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one!"
Wish we had more Lincolns making policy for us today. Or, failing that, at least a few policy makers who would understand the point of the story.