Sig Sauer doubles down: https://www.police1.com/firearms/sig-sauer-sues-ore-police-training-board-over-p320-ban
They can't for many reasons. Primary amongst those reasons is they don't want the MHS PVTs made common knowledge. Just the snippets I've seen do not reflect well upon the 320, especially the M18 variant which seemed to not actually have passed on any measure other than price, which was bid before the evaluation started.I have to ask myself the question with as large a company as SIG is why have they not addressed this issue and had a recall?
I suspect qualified immunity will be claimed and Sig told to pound sand.
They DID have a voluntary recall, which is why I don't understandI have to ask myself the question with as large a company as SIG is why have they not addressed this issue and had a recall?
Well for starters the Glocks were primarily going off due to provable fingers or actual FOD in very inappropriate holsters of the era when striker fired handguns were new. There were some Glocks that did make it out of the factory with bad parts, unlike Sig they recalled the entire lots and fixed the issue.They DID have a voluntary recall, which is why I don't understand
Glock certainly had more reports of their guns going off and they aren't banned anywhere that I'm aware of![]()
My wife has P238, which she loves. It's a mini 1911 in .380. They had a safety lever recall on the P238's, but it didn't involve her pistol's serial number. Beautiful gun.
I don't own one a P320, but as a firearm enthusiast, I have been following up on the issue. I found this video very interesting.
You tube has several unscripted surveillance camera videos featuring law enforcement officers having unscripted uncommanded discharges in holsters. I understand there is not a problem if the pistol is reassembled in accordance with methodology illustrated in the "Sig User's Manual". Manual prescribes that the slide be locked open with the slide lock which completely withdraws the sear away from the striker preventing partial engagement of the striker and sear. If the slide is just slid onto the frame like most folks assemble a Glock the sear is only partially withdrawn and partial engagement results.I'd posted this in another thread, but it bears repeating here. The following agencies have now withdrawn the P320 from authorized use as a duty/training sidearm: San Antonio PD, Chicago PD, Oklahoma City PD, Oklahoma HP, San Francisco PD, Houston PD, Denver PD, Milwaukee PD, the National Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors Association, and the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission. I imagine that's not an exhaustive list. In addition, last month U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued an emergency, non-competitive requisition for Glock 19's to replace their P320's.
I don't suppose this mass switching out of the SIG's was done on a whim, there had to have been serious safety/liability concerns. The future of the platform may rest on what the military decides to do with their M17 and M18 variants. I do find it interesting that some of the above agencies traded in their P320's and that these were subsequently marketed to the general public.
I've got three P250's..... Best carry gun I've found, ok, second only to a Beretta 92 compact type-M.My Sig P250sc has raised a few eyebrows
I'd love to get my hands on a P250 or two now - they're hard to find these days. I have two P320s and they're relegated to square range duty, with extra care taken once loaded.I've got three P250's..... Best carry gun I've found, ok, second only to a Beretta 92 compact type-M.
All (maybe the vast majority) are end user error. (Just like on computers!)I bought a M17 for my active duty grandson, it has only had a few hundred rounds through it. I had not heard of problems with the M17, but would like to know what they are!
It came to the club's attention the other day that a few of the pistol shooters at the indoor range that are usually involved with timed shooting events are using the Sig P320. I was not up to date on its issues and looked into it during the meeting. I figured if the IDPA banned it from any of their events that was good enough for me and I seconded a motion to remove it from range use until the issue was resolved. As unpopular as it may seem, our insurance liabilities are high as it is and we have lost our long time insurance agency because as they put it "insuring firing ranges is not in our personal interest." Currently the only other Firearm we have banned is anything that fires .50 BMG as well as anything full automatic which includes the mechanical assitance that fires more than one round per second. That is our range limit, double taps are not practiced as well as any firing from the holster, all shots are fired from the bench with one shot per second the maximum. We do have an action pistol league at the indoor range, what they do is their business.