Best Model 60?

toasterburn

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
8
Reaction score
8
I'm interested in buying a Model 60 (2").

Since the Model 60 has had several variations over the years, is there a model that's more desirable than the others?

I prefer having the SA option, I plan to only shoot .38, and I don't want an internal lock. So, it seems I have the following options:

60 - introduced in 1965
60-3 (1988) New yoke retention system
60-7 (1990) front sight 1/8 inch wide, new heat treatment
60-8 (1990) same as 60-7 for NYPD
60-9 (1996) change to J magnum frame
60-10 (1996) Target variation on J magnum frame
60-11 (1996) New frame design for 38 Special version only
60-12 (1996) new frame nose cut
60-13 (1996) same as 60-12 but target version
 
Register to hide this ad
60-4 for the .38 Models

attachment.php
 
I like the 60-9 because of the 357 Mag capability.

Or if you only want 38 special with no 357 option, then the 60-7. The 60-7 is stronger and has a little better sights.
 
You can't go wrong with ANY model 60. Better..worse..whatever..it is way to subjective to have a valid answer to that question. Buy one..any one..you will grow to love it.
My first brand new revolver was a 60 back in the 80s. A Jovino square butt..which I didn't know at the time was any different than any other 60. No wonder I had trouble getting grips...:)
 
For a classic 2" - a pinned barrel model 60 (made until about 1981). For + P capability, the 60-7, still available fairly regularly in regular and Lady Smith variations.
 
For a 2in I would say 60-9.
3in, 60-10.
I like to be able to shoot 357s out of them.
I tried to find a 60-10 at a reasonable price for awhile. Finally gave up and ordered a 60-15. Should be in tomorrow.
 
I’m with TNZ71 on this. Unless it were to be used strictly as a CC/BUG, I would go for the 60-4 with its 3” bbl with under lug and adjustable sights for maximum versatility. FWIW, this is the only Model 60 I own. If it were going need to be well hidden all the time, I’d look for a 60 or 60-1, anything with pinned barrel. The foregoing is JMHO, but that’s what you asked for! ;)

Froggie
 
I suppose I should also ask:

Looking through my Holster collection, I have a couple of nice vintage Model 60 .38 holsters.

Will these fit the newer .357 Model 60's as well?
 
Last edited:
Not even a contest. . .the 60-7 from the early 1990's. If you want a 357, go buy one. . .just not a M60.
 
I like them all. I am starting to collect J-Frames, and have my old 60 n/d I carried off-duty and as a back up in the late 70's, a 36 a 640-2 and a 340 M&P. I intend to collect many more. I would still like to find a 3" like TNZ71 has. Very nice gun. As far as carry goes, I carry the 340 M&P most often because of my advanced age and the light weight.
 
I like them all. I am starting to collect J-Frames, and have my old 60 n/d I carried off-duty and as a back up in the late 70's, a 36 a 640-2 and a 340 M&P. I intend to collect many more. I would still like to find a 3" like TNZ71 has. Very nice gun. As far as carry goes, I carry the 340 M&P most often because of my advanced age and the light weight.

There is one one gunbroker now for 900 bucks! Lol
 
For a 2in I would say 60-9.
3in, 60-10.
I like to be able to shoot 357s out of them.
I tried to find a 60-10 at a reasonable price for awhile. Finally gave up and ordered a 60-15. Should be in tomorrow.

Yes, finding the no lock, magnum 60's isn't easy.

I finally found a 60-9 (2") and go to bail it out of jail tomorrow.

I have a 60-15 and it's a great gun, accurate and has a good (for a J frame) trigger.

It's sort of a mini - 686.

Lock has given me zero trouble.
 
You've posted in '61-'80 but ask about later models.

I've had a couple different versions from no dash to new.. all good.

Right now I have a -14. Because of the recoil with 357 and it has a lock, I chose to remove the flag portion not that I've had a problem with the locks. Just don't want to at the wrong time.
 
I suppose I should also ask:

Looking through my Holster collection, I have a couple of nice vintage Model 60 .38 holsters.

Will these fit the newer .357 Model 60's as well?

If they were tightly boned/fitted to an original model 60, probably not - the frame (J Magnum) is slightly larger and they have a 2 1/8" underlug barrel.
 

Attachments

  • 09CECFE6-02C5-4BB8-8382-5EAA54C82A7B.jpg
    09CECFE6-02C5-4BB8-8382-5EAA54C82A7B.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 70
  • 69739308-75B9-4E8F-A93B-0139B4F43930.jpg
    69739308-75B9-4E8F-A93B-0139B4F43930.jpg
    88.9 KB · Views: 58
  • 5638F254-8BA2-4F5A-A7BE-B14314ADB742.jpg
    5638F254-8BA2-4F5A-A7BE-B14314ADB742.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 54
  • 21C573D9-19F1-4403-85B6-733D5B478F54.jpg
    21C573D9-19F1-4403-85B6-733D5B478F54.jpg
    78.8 KB · Views: 45
I had a 60-3 Lady Smith with a 3" barrel, but I didn't like the anatomically designed-for-a-lady's hand stocks so I sold it to a lady friend who loves it. I picked up a 60-9 Lady Smith and like it a lot (except for the stocks -- they don't fit well, and they don't fit my mitt). I have an extra pair of S&W combat stocks that work perfectly!

I believe the -9 outdoes the -7 for a few reasons. It can be had with a 2⅛" barrel so the longer extractor rod helps. It's got a full lug: function and good looks! I'm one of those oddballs who doesn't mind shooting .357s out of a J-frame (it's all about having the right stocks) so the capability is there if and when I want it.

I've read here, but I don't know if it's true, the company does a bit of extra work on the Lady Smith actions. Each of the five Lady Smiths I own has a great action compared to the standard models.

Often I find the Lady Smiths to be a bargain by comparison, too, and I'm comfortable enough with my manhood that I don't care what "issue" (a word I normally would not use) some bad guy might have with me carrying a Lady Smith (nobody else would ever know!).
 

Attachments

  • 1999 60-9.jpg
    1999 60-9.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 69
  • 1999 60-9 LS.jpg
    1999 60-9 LS.jpg
    84.4 KB · Views: 63
  • 1999 60-9 LS, combats.jpg
    1999 60-9 LS, combats.jpg
    86.5 KB · Views: 64
I love the M-60-4, but you specified a true snub, a point lost on some respondents. As usual... :rolleyes:

M-60-7. Has metallurgical and yoke retention improvements. Is RATED for Plus P. Older ones officially aren't.

Factory told me that M-60-4 was the first Rated for Plus P.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top