Best personal defense Ammo for shield 9mm?

We used Hornady CDs in our Shield and M&P 9 FS' for years. Recently switched to Federal HST 147 gr. and haven't looked back. My wife likes it in her Shield. Recoil is better (different) than 124s. Check out the Luckygunner test on HST 147 gr, awesome results. Plus, great price at Bone Frog Ammo, 50 rds for what you'd pay for 25 of CD. Win Win.

If you like the HST 147gr you will like their new 150gr round even more! It has noticeably less recoil and less muzzle flash but achieves the same penetration and expansion profile.
I bought several boxes at Walmart for less than the 124gr or 147gr cost.
 
I run 147 HST through my shield no issues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
How does the Federal HST 124 +p vs the standard pressure 124 gr loading compare in the performance center shield?
 
How does the Federal HST 124 +p vs the standard pressure 124 gr loading compare in the performance center shield?
In my extensive gel testing the 124 performs better in regards to penetration and expansion combined. 124 penetrates to 18" and .622 average expansion. The +P penetrated to 15" and expanded .628-.632.
 
Just was curious if the +p does better in ported model with the velocity that is lost thru the porting, but sounds like the standard loading is the way to go.
 
Just was curious if the +p does better in ported model with the velocity that is lost thru the porting, but sounds like the standard loading is the way to go.
I thought that too but not the case.
 
Anything that comes out of the barrel and cycles the next round when you pull the trigger will be fine . . .

^^This^^

While all of the penetration and expansion info you've received is important, the above info from Muss is the most important.

My Shield 9 is unusually picky about ammo, so to insure that whatever SD ammo I carried would load, fire, and eject, I subjected several highly regarded rounds to reliability tests. My goal was to find a round that would fire at least 100 consecutive times without a failure. At the time of testing, my Shield had fired over 3000 rounds, so it was thoroughly broken in, and it had clean magazines and a new, properly functioning RSA.
Here are the results:

The clear winner was Hornady Critical Duty 135g +P. It (so far) has fired 174 rounds without a single failure of any kind. It is the only SD round I've tried that has had zero failures.

In second is Speer Gold Dot 124g +P. After three FTEs which occurred early in my Shield's history, the Gold Dots have since fired 147 times with no failures.

Virtually tied for second is Remington Golden Saber 147g. The Goldern Sabers had one early FTE, then fired 227 times before a second FTE. They are also the most accurate of the top three rounds.

What about the vaunted HSTs? I tried Federal HST 124g +P rounds, and in a word, they were wretched. They had three failures to feed in 31 rounds. They would hang up on the bottom of my feed ramp. They were clearly not suitable for my Shield, so I quit testing them, and donated the remainder to my SIG P320. I could not find HST 147g rounds at the time, so I haven't tested them.

I hope you find this info useful, but don't just take my word for it (or anyone else's either). Do your own testing, and find what works reliably for you and your Shield. And if firing a few hundred SD rounds to make that determination seems expensive, ask yourself what your life is worth. Ammunition is always cheap in comparison.
 
Of all the shields I've owned none have been fincky with ammo. I'm just wandering if there is something out of spec with your shield to cause those feeding/ejection issues.
 
Of all the shields I've owned none have been fincky with ammo. I'm just wandering if there is something out of spec with your shield to cause those feeding/ejection issues.

I have two Shields - a standard and a PC. Both have eaten whatever I have fed them with no hiccups. I am not saying that some Shields are not ammo sensitive, but mine certainly aren't. I have tried HST, Liberty, Gold Dot, Critical Duty, Critical Defense. No issues with any of them
 
Of all the shields I've owned none have been fincky with ammo. I'm just wandering if there is something out of spec with your shield to cause those feeding/ejection issues.

I sent it back to the factory once to check on a slightly loose ejector. They returned it saying everything was within spec. It now is mostly a safe queen, since I decided that my EDC would be my much more reliable (and potent) M&P 40 compact. To be fair, my Shield has improved since I did the SD ammo testing, going 1000 rounds before its most recent FTE. However, my 40c has had only four FTEs/FTFs in 8500 rounds, as opposed to my Shield's 28 FTEs/FTFs in 4800 rounds.
 
I have a PC Shield and a regular Shield barrel. It/they have been flawless with over 9-10 different JHP and all fmj. Something is clearly amiss with yours being so finicky
 
My Shield has had zero function issues with either Glod Dot G2 or Winchester Ranger bonded, both in 147 grain weights. In the real world, the 9mm loads that have been used by law enforcement agencies, including the Ranger series, Gold Dot, and HST get high marks for street performance in other loadings besides 147s. In my area, the Critical Defense loads are easier to find than the others, however.
 
Speer Gold Dot LE is very common for police agency's in Georgia. The state troopers went from .45 gap to 9mm and spent a lot of time testing ammo brands. Also tested on a windshield. I don't have time or money for that level of testing. So I just trust what they use.
 
Traditional SD ammo is not always tested in 3 inch barrels and many do not reach full velocity needed to properly expand. Several companies make ammo designed for short barrels, faster burning powder. Just cause it cycles in your gun does not mean it's effective SD ammo. Gold Dots for instance do not expand from a short barrel, despite being a favorite of many, including me out of a 5 inch barrel. I use Remington designed for 3 inch. barrels. I think it's called micro?
 
Back
Top