Still happy
Atrocious mine isn't. Mine, from the box (properly lubricated) has the same discernable trigger pull as my models 37 and 38 (both pre 1966) and re-set is virtually the same. As a deep concealed backup it's exactly what I was looking for. Accurate and carried safety off (like the Ruger LC9S pro with no "safety").
. Glocks .380 is too bulky for my taste.
I have no problem buying/using quality ammo, 450 rounds flawless,
so no concerns from hand load or cheap ammo (garbage in, garbage out).
As far as one poster (not you KC)
saying the BG.380 is half as well made as a hi point, I haven't messed with hi point, as I consider them to be off brand and not suitable because of their design, and try not to waste my time.
As well, I haven't felt the need to dismantle, file, polish, inspect with microscope or x-ray my BG.380 searching for an excuse for having bubba-ed up a perfectly seviceable firearm, or failed to clean and lube before firing.
Take your pick, maybe I'm incredibly lucky or maybe, just maybe...someone has gotten a lemon...and that can happen.
But by using good quality ammo, doing nothing more than a field strip, clean and lube properly PRIOR to going to the range (I used Tri-Flo), my BG.380 is just fine. It isn't a range gun, and I don't expect to have to fire several hundred rounds in a gun battle with it. It was designed as a hideout, so that's what I use it for.
All the best and have a Merry Christmas
Add'm: the theory of firing pin weight and length remind me of the warnings we used to hear about bobbed hammers on the j frame backups. Most always went back to reloads or old or bad ammo.
(Not to say there may indeed have been a design flaw in the early BG.380 firing pin or assembly.)
I studied pocket guns for a year and finally bought the BG .380 without a laser. Dry firing, it has the most atrocious trigger I have ever owned in my life. I want to shoot it. Is shooting it considerably different than dry firing it? No one makes any comment about the trigger pull, or the fact that when dry firing it, it doesn't break until almost to the back of the trigger guard. Is everyone having this experience?
Atrocious mine isn't. Mine, from the box (properly lubricated) has the same discernable trigger pull as my models 37 and 38 (both pre 1966) and re-set is virtually the same. As a deep concealed backup it's exactly what I was looking for. Accurate and carried safety off (like the Ruger LC9S pro with no "safety").
. Glocks .380 is too bulky for my taste.
I have no problem buying/using quality ammo, 450 rounds flawless,
so no concerns from hand load or cheap ammo (garbage in, garbage out).
As far as one poster (not you KC)

As well, I haven't felt the need to dismantle, file, polish, inspect with microscope or x-ray my BG.380 searching for an excuse for having bubba-ed up a perfectly seviceable firearm, or failed to clean and lube before firing.
Take your pick, maybe I'm incredibly lucky or maybe, just maybe...someone has gotten a lemon...and that can happen.
But by using good quality ammo, doing nothing more than a field strip, clean and lube properly PRIOR to going to the range (I used Tri-Flo), my BG.380 is just fine. It isn't a range gun, and I don't expect to have to fire several hundred rounds in a gun battle with it. It was designed as a hideout, so that's what I use it for.
All the best and have a Merry Christmas

Add'm: the theory of firing pin weight and length remind me of the warnings we used to hear about bobbed hammers on the j frame backups. Most always went back to reloads or old or bad ammo.
(Not to say there may indeed have been a design flaw in the early BG.380 firing pin or assembly.)
Last edited: