I always find these discussions intriguing. The banter is always the same. Plastic guns have no soul, quality is the same regardless of price, young kids vs old geezers. The mantra never changes.
Two things that are never brought up, ability to shoot and gun enthusiasm.
Let's face it, in this day, any new gun owner is a good thing. If it takes a plastic wonder nine to get them in the door, I see it as a good thing. Don't you?
The other thing is shoot-ability. I have a friend who's done a lot for me, but can't afford a handgun. So, I thought I'd buy him one. I was willing to spend some serious cash to get him the right gun. However, it wasn't about price. It was about getting him the right gun for him. He didn't know I was going to pay for it, but I dragged him to several stores over a few weekends. I also had him shoot several models. All this just to find the right gun for him.
He really liked the Sig Sauer line, but was finding it difficult to operate all the controls. He liked the trigger on 1911s, but didn't like the thumb safety. He liked the DA/SA function of the H&K USP, but it didn't fit his hand as well as the Sig. Just to get the full effect, I forced him to pick up a Glock. Sure enough, he liked the Glock the best. It had the best combination of trigger feel, ease of use and fit for him. So we bought it.
This is his first 20 shots with the new Glock:
We've added a new shooter to the gun enthusiast ranks, who can shoot his gun reasonably well. Now I ask you, does it matter what material it is made of or the brand name on the slide?