Texas Star
US Veteran
Canadian media are hailing him as a hero.
Well, he sure deserves a gift certificate to Tim Horton's!

Or, more. I hope they give him a medal.
Canadian media are hailing him as a hero.
And in that one instant, Sgt Vickers made the US Secret Service look like a clown parade. Well done Sgt Vickers, SIR!
Makes you wonder how many would have been killed had not this individual been ready and willing to take action against the rifle wielding terrorist. I wonder if the media will praise his action as a good man with a gun stopping a bad man with a gun. I'm not holding my breath for this to happen.
Canada called it a terrorist act...I guess it would be work place violence here.....
Sergeant-at-Arms Vickers will add some letters to his last name and that he will be awarded the Canadian Cross of Valor.
You could tell by the way he carried himself that he is still at heart a Mountie.
Mark, here is an explanation from one of the Canadian fellows (Ben) on the other board you and I belong to:
"The "Sgt. At Arms" is usually, in normal times, NOT armed. Usually he is only armed with a Ceremonial Mace but about 30 years ago there was a mentally unbalanced soldier who took over the Quebec Legislature, killing 3 and wounding 13 in the process. While he was spraying and shooting up the Council Chamber, the Sgt at Arms coolly walked in and demanded to know what is the meaning of this outrage, and in his best military voice ordered the soldier to stand down.
The shooter was persuaded to go to the Sgt at Arms' office to discuss what he had done. After 4 hours of persuasion he surrendered amid many tears of contrition . The unarmed Sgt at Arms, Maj. Rene Jalbert, was a much decorated war hero with 5 years of combat in WWll and 2 years in the Korean conflict. He took this ceremonial job as a plum reward for his heroic and outstanding service to our country.
Major Jalbert was awarded our country's highest bravery medal, to go with his many others. More importantly after that, most, if not all, sergeants at arms are armed."
Where does that decoration rank? Is it a civilian award? I think Australia modified the award of the VC to indicate a more Aussie name. Did Canada also do that? Several Aussies have received the VC in Iraq or Afghanistan. But it was for military valor.
I think the British dropped the old Distinguished Service Order as second to the VC and have a new award in its place, for all ranks.
A Canadian friend of mine reported that Sgt. Vickers shot the bad guy twice in the chest and once in the head. With his issued S&W 9mm. Which from the one picture I saw is probably a 5946 or 5943.
"The "Sgt. At Arms" is usually, in normal times, NOT armed. Usually he is only armed with a Ceremonial Mace but about 30 years ago there was a mentally unbalanced soldier who took over the Quebec Legislature, killing 3 and wounding 13 in the process. While he was spraying and shooting up the Council Chamber, the Sgt at Arms coolly walked in and demanded to know what is the meaning of this outrage, and in his best military voice ordered the soldier to stand down.
The shooter was persuaded to go to the Sgt at Arms' office to discuss what he had done. After 4 hours of persuasion he surrendered amid many tears of contrition . The unarmed Sgt at Arms, Maj. Rene Jalbert, was a much decorated war hero with 5 years of combat in WWll and 2 years in the Korean conflict. He took this ceremonial job as a plum reward for his heroic and outstanding service to our country.
Major Jalbert was awarded our country's highest bravery medal, to go with his many others. More importantly after that, most, if not all, sergeants at arms are armed."