Great! So then you accept full liability for the legal advice you are handing out in this thread, yes? Remember, no one is anonymous on the web.I passed the bar exam with flying colors!!!

Great! So then you accept full liability for the legal advice you are handing out in this thread, yes? Remember, no one is anonymous on the web.I passed the bar exam with flying colors!!!
Me personally, no. I can't speak for a jury, though...What legal advice is that? Discussion on an internet forum, not legal advice...
You think everything a lawyer ever says or writes is legal advice?
It doesn't matter.You can read Arizona Ethics Opinion,
97-04: Computer Technology; Internet; Advertising and Solicitation; Confidentiality.
Hope that clears things up.
Armed, means capable of causing death or great bodily harm. Ali would no longer be considered armed today because of his physicality, but in his day, absolutely. Mike Tyson is always armed, because he has the ability to cause death or greatly bodily harm with no weapon. Same with other MMA fighters, or highly trained military combatants. Anyone reasonable capable of a quick kill with hands alone = an armed attacker.
This goes back to the force = force rule. Mike Tyson's force with bare hands is deadly, thus, deadly force would be justified.
Ali would no longer be considered armed today because of his physicality, but in his day, absolutely.
after 40 plus yrs of reloading, only my loads. as stated earlier, i want to know what is in them. over the years i have had more duds with factory ammo than mine. if i have to use a gun, the last thing i will worry about is what ammo is in it.