Nope. Wouldn't change my opinion even the tiniest little bit. When you make a fully-informed, free and willing choice, you get to live with the consequences of that choice. That is perfectly fair, and it is how the world SHOULD work in every situation.
I mean, honestly, are you really arguing that people should NOT have to live with the consequences of their freely-made choices? I find that a pretty bizarre position for anyone to take.
But I'll leave it at that, and you're welcome to have the last word.
Does it bother you that they are expected to pay taxes, register for the draft, and are subject to the laws of the United States, but because of geography they have no vote?
Seems rather arbitrary, especially when we remember that the reason for that is Thomas Jefferson's weird theories about the power of a state government in the daily life of a citizen.
Memphis, Chicago, NY, Phily., Detroit, They are headed your way.
**shades of Kent State 1970**
Gentlemen, many of us are veterans of the armed forces or law-enforcement. We know that there is a logical fallacy between what other people attribute our skills to be, what our strengths are, and what are our weaknesses are. We all know that there are individual high and low performers., And we are all familiar with the systems of risk mitigation, Controls, policies, training, and ultimately individual discretion that we trust and rely on to do our jobs. We are also all familiar with instances where one or more of those fail, and when adverse consequence has happened.
Introducing people without local familiarization, on an unclear mission, with unknown training, to a high stress situation is never a good idea. I'm not claiming that the national guardsman detail to pick up trash are going to go rogue on someone. I am expressing a concern that a national guard soldier may well find themselves precipitating 2025's version of the Boston massacre if they are placed in a high stress situation with unclear guidance and/or they have personal discretion that may not meet the moment. And before all of the apologists and denialists come sprinting to say it could never happen, remember that Ohio national guard troopers not unlike those today decided on their own to shoot a lot of live rounds into peacefully protesting college students because their feelings were hurt.
And that's before we even begin to touch the prospect that we have a chain of command that may well be defining lawful activity as criminal, we do not know the specific roles the National Guard is even there for, and we do not know what is happening in general terms. There's nothing quite as interesting as a secretive police force, right?