CMMG joins LEO Boycott
- Thread starter Blades
- Start date
- Status
RedNeck Jim
Member
Does seem to go against forum rules, however when this board runs ads, like the attached, it makes me wonder if political posts are allowed.
I would think some folks would not be attracted to settling in with the "general mindset" around here. Learn something new, before the lock, every time. Joe
looseman- im sorry comparing the british empire and quartering of soldiers and taxation with out representation and compare it to the banning of a magazine then you loose me.
Collects- if they already have the equipment they need then so do you. And a LEO with a worn out mag that cant be replaced because a trend started by companies to not sell to LEOs there fore not allowing him to have the equipment he needs to fulfill his duties = danger. You know that is a fact stop trying to inject politics into the fact that LEOs are above you when it comes to gun rights, the same reason they can have an automatic weapon with out a stamp and you cant, same reason they can turn on thier lights and go how ever fast they see fit and you cant. The same reason the can make arrests and searches and you cant. You DO NOT have the same rights as a LEO in his official duties.
Collects- if they already have the equipment they need then so do you. And a LEO with a worn out mag that cant be replaced because a trend started by companies to not sell to LEOs there fore not allowing him to have the equipment he needs to fulfill his duties = danger. You know that is a fact stop trying to inject politics into the fact that LEOs are above you when it comes to gun rights, the same reason they can have an automatic weapon with out a stamp and you cant, same reason they can turn on thier lights and go how ever fast they see fit and you cant. The same reason the can make arrests and searches and you cant. You DO NOT have the same rights as a LEO in his official duties.
I'm Sorry I lost you...I'll speak slower
"and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
In simple terms, that means we will only put up with so much steping on out GOD given rights before we start to resist.
This country existed for for 138 years with zero gun controll, it's been slowly and methodically added to little by little so that, you sir, are a Frog in a pot of boiling water, you just don't know it.
"and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
In simple terms, that means we will only put up with so much steping on out GOD given rights before we start to resist.
This country existed for for 138 years with zero gun controll, it's been slowly and methodically added to little by little so that, you sir, are a Frog in a pot of boiling water, you just don't know it.
Shooterjgs
Member
The other side isn't pulling any punches when it comes to our Second Amendment rights... why should our side...
The other side isn't pulling any punches when it comes to our Second Amendment rights... why should our side...
Because they know what is good for us
looseman you can quote all you want it was a document designed to change, that's why you can add and remove amendments... can you follow or do i need to talk with a rush limbaugh accent so you can understand? your just a home grown radical, you just dont know it yet. i think you all forgot what the P stamped on the side of your gun stands for.
Brett248Vista
Member
Militia and Persons? 
I do not know what all the fuss is about anyway. It is not like these companies that are refusing to sell guns or parts in states that are passing new gun laws make double barreled shotguns. According to Mr. Biden all they would need is a double barreled shotgun. I wonder if his secret service detail all carry those.
Last edited:
Dezfan
Member
Military and Police.
Now do some research on the Dick Act 1902 and get back to me.
Remember, of the PEOPLE, for the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE!
The only "radicals" are those trying to usurp our Constitutional Rights!
MOLAN LABE!
Majorlk
Member
It's interesting how many posts sound like they were written by the anti-gun crowd. Same arguments; same faulty logic.
I was taught to follow any and all lawful orders. Talk to Oliver North about that one.
gm272gs: QUOTE: ''Yea when I was in the Army''?? Army or Marines? Just Curious
RedNeck Jim
Member
Sorry, but just as well as we have the radical left, that wishes to ban all guns, we have the radical right, which espouses dissolving the government. Thankfully most folks live in the middle.
But I am curious as to what constitutional rights have been usurped? Have you been denied the right to bear arms? Has any law been passed to ban firearm possession?
Yes, there is talk & laws being passed that may restrict ownership of certain classes of firearms & their accessories. If they are unconstitutional, the rule of law, the Constitution, will determine that.
IMO, it is important to realize none of the rights "guaranteed" under the Constitution or the Bill of Rights are absolute. We have the right of free speech, yet you can't state anything you wish. You can't libel someone by talking falsehoods & you can't yell "FIRE" in a theater that would cause harm to others. You have the right of liberty yet if you break the law, your liberty is taken away. We have the right to bear arms yet that right has restrictions. We don't want convicted criminals legally owning weapons, do we? We don't want 9 year olds walking up to the store & buying guns, do we?
These lawmakers passing these laws were elected lawfully BY THE PEOPLE. They are doing what they think is right FOR THE PEOPLE & BY THE PEOPLE. Any talk of disobeying laws goes against the rule of law that our country is founded on & is very radical... more so than someone trying to pass legislation to restrict a right.
I am not making an argument one way or the other & I sure hope my logic is sound. I am obviously a gun owner & am against any ban whatsoever. However more than anything, I am an American & think our rule of law is the greatest in the world. As a youngster, I stated an oath to obey that rule of law & will continue to do so till I breath my last breath.
I quoted the guy in the Army. I thought it superfluous to reiterate that my training came from the Corps, what with the EG&A in my profile.
Majorlk
Member
That's just what Al Sharpton said last week: No one has a right to unrestricted rights. That's pure anti-gun BS and an attempt to justify illegal conduct on the part of government.
Your two statements are contradictory; you can't have it both ways.
"Shall not be infringed" seems pretty clear to me, but then I'm just a simple preacher man.
Last edited:
RedNeck Jim
Member
What is illegal? What law has the government broken? If a law is passed by our legislature & makes it past the executive branch, both at state & federal level, then it is law. Makes no difference if you or I agree with the law... it is law. Of course, many laws have been passed that are later determined to be unconstitutional, but there is a process to determine that. What we state are just opinions.
.
You can't be any simpler than me... seriously. So you take it that NOTHING can take away a right? That the convicted sex offender living down the block should be able to walk down the street carrying a gun? That person should be allowed to hang around a school? That my 6 year old Godchild should be able to walk into a store & buy a gun?
Surely we all agree that all rights can be & should be infringed. The debate is not there, I would hope. The debate is on the extent of infringement.
- Status
Similar threads
