"Commander-size" 1911s



I've had a Sig 1911CA-45-BSS, which is a Commander-size gun. One of our sons fleeced me of $890 for it. It's a terrific gun and I like it because it doesn't have a rail. I don't need a rail for a carry gun. It is nicely dehorned by the factory.
Then I was offered a Sig 1911CAR-45-SCPN "Scorpion" for a little more money. ANOTHER terrific gun. It does have a rail and I find that causes two problems: 1. holsters to fit it. The Sig profile is just different from other 1911s. 2. the tips of the rail are SHARP! It really needs to be dehorned.
Both are all-steel and feel like artillery pieces.
Then I got a Springfield Champion Operator Light Weight. It has a rail but everything is low-profile on this gun, making it an ideal carry piece.
It was cheaper than the Sigs and came with a "Loaded" coupon for discount accessories. Also came with a dual mag holder, which I really like.
Everybody who has shot it has called it "One fine gun!" It's definitely a top choice, in my opinion.
Another one I have is a S&W 1911Sc, pre-E model. It is the very gun that Gun Tests Magazine tested. Love the size, love the weight, no rail. I think of it as even-up with the Champion Operator LW, but most people seem to prefer the Springfield.
And finally my S&W PC1911RB. I can't say enough good about it, except that it was expensive. Also, S&W says the magazines are particular to the gun. Not supposed to use magazines from other guns. I do anyway, but they often show a little below the bottom of the grip. It is all-steel so it is heavier, but definitely feels lighter than the Sigs.
All-steel guns are fine, but I find no disadvantages in the light-weights. Sooo, in order of MY preference: Springfield Champion Operator LW and S&W 1911Sc, then the others.