Concealed carry and the Mexican Restaurant - Finale

Faulkner

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Messages
6,602
Reaction score
37,491
Location
Arkansas Ozarks
Concealed Carry and the Mexican Restaurant - Chapter 3

Chapter 1 is here: http://smith-wessonforum.com/lounge/298675-concealed-carry-mexican-restaurant.html

Chapter 2 is here: http://smith-wessonforum.com/lounge...can-restaurant-chapter-2-a.html#post137041273


Finally the day came for the concealed carry class for Mr. & Mrs. Brady, the complainants from the Mexican Restaurant. Frankly, I didn't know if they would really show, but sure enough they did. I greeted them at the entrance to the event center where the class was held and introduced them to the other three instructors. The instructors were, or course, fully briefed on the sheriff's pet project.

The other dozen class members were not briefed about Mr. & Mrs. Brady. Now, I wouldn't say the rest of the class was exactly hand picked for this specific class, but we did do some juggling around to get a good mix of men and women in the hopes of making Mr. & Mrs. Brady comfortable with a diversified class.

The classroom session went great. Though Mr. & Mrs. Brady seemed at first hesitant to participate in the discussion or ask questions, they did finally do so. What I found to be very surprising is they did not engage in any liberal "guns are bad" anti-gun rhetoric. None at all. Eventually, I came to believe they truly consider themselves academics and were there to learn. As all good instructors do we told the class there was no such thing as a stupid question and Mr. & Mrs. Brady took us at our word. Having no previous gun knowledge most of the questions they asked, specifically Mr. Brady, were mostly technical in nature. He asked questions about the difference between single action, double action, and double action only revolvers. It was interesting to watch the light bulb come on when we talked about why big handguns are big and small handguns are small and the advantages and disadvantages of each. At one point, Mrs. Smith commented that she'd thought that all handguns could use high capacity magazines.

As I talked to them after the classroom session, they both told me how intrigued they were over the legal aspects of the class discussion and how if someone should, unfortunately, actually get involved in a self defense shooting, how it could literally ruin their lives. Mrs. Brady commented to me, "I was so impressed how you told the class over and over it's a very bad thing if you actually have to shoot someone. That's not the message we were expecting."

I reminded her that a concealed carry class is to help teach people about using firearms as a defensive measure in the hopes that one never, ever, has to use one on another human being. I also talked to her about my years in law enforcement and that I know through personal experience that there are mean people in this world, there are mean people in our country, and there are mean people right here in our community. As a cop, I would love nothing better than to put all the mean people in our community in jail before they could do mean stuff to other people, but even mean people have rights guaranteed in our constitution. I told them that mean people can be mean for a lot of reasons that may or may not be their fault. They could be mean because of drug and alcohol abuse, abuse as a child, mental defect, or just out of desperation. I've seen people that were mean because they were just mean. I also told her that mean people aren't necessarily stupid and they don't typically do mean things to people who will fight back or who can take them to jail.

So I asked her, "if a mean person was about to do bad things to you or your loved ones, would you rather have the ability to try and stop them, or wait 15 or 30 minutes or longer for the police to arrive, which may be too late!"

"We've always been taught that the police could get there in time", she replied.

"I've worked too many rapes and murders in my career to know we don't get there in time most of the time," I said.

She pondered on that a while.

After the classroom session we made the short trip over to the Sheriff's Department firing range. I fixed up Mr. & Mrs. Brady with a couple of Glock 19 compact 9mm's. I've trained a lot of people through the years who have never handled a firearm before so this was nothing new for the instructors or I. The first thing we did was revisit the safety practices we covered in the classroom session. They were very attentive and engaged. I suppose my prejudice towards them had me expecting them to hold their nose and pick up the handguns as though it were a smelly dead fish, but they didn't. What surprised me the most what that it was Mrs. Brady who seemed to be the most eager to get on the firing line.

Once on the firing line they did, well, okay for beginners. Since neither had ever fired a firearm they had no bad habits. We started off at the 3 yard line but I eventually let them shoot from 7, 15, and 25 yards as well. They didn't put very many rounds on the paper at 25 yards which lead to another interesting conversation with them. By watching TV and movies, they assumed they would be able to shoot man sized targets at 100 or 200 yards, maybe even a mile away with their handguns. And what about blowing up cars and shooting down helicopters? What about body parts being blown off and people sailing through the air after being shot?

"It's all Hollywood," I told them. "That's what sells movies and advertising for TV."

In preparation for this line of questioning, I'd brought an old 5 gallon metal gas can to the range that was about half full. After letting them confirm there was gasoline in the can, we had them back off to the 50 yard line while I shot four or five holes in it from the 25 yard line with my .45 1911A1. Then I fired a couple of rounds into the spilled gasoline on the ground. No sparks, no explosion, no nothing. Just a 5 gallon gas can that I ruined by shooting holes in it.

When I turned and walked back to them I said, "kind of disappointing, huh?"

Mrs. Brady asked, "why didn't it blow up or something?"

"Like I said, that only happens in Hollywood. They get paid millions of dollars to embellish the truth and it's gotten to the point that the public can't tell truth from fiction by what comes out of Hollywood when it comes to guns."

The sheriff showed up about then and asked me if we were finished.

"Yes sir, we were just wrapping it up."

He turned to Mr. & Mrs. Brady and says, "well, did you learn anything today?"

"I learned a lot!" exclaimed Mr. Brady

"It was not nearly as scary as I thought it would be," said Mrs. Brady, "and the instructors made the range time feel very safe. I had fun."

The sheriff said he had to run to a meeting, but asked them if they would mind calling his office and setting up a time with his secretary for him to visit with them about the events of the past couple of weeks. They said they would be glad to.

After the sheriff left, Mr. Brady asked me, "what's that all about."

"For some reason, the sheriff has taken an interest in you."

"Thank you for spending extra time with us. I thought you and the other instructors were very professional today and I want to thank you for your patience with us," Mrs. Brady said, and they left.

Who knows, maybe something positive will come out of all this. I don't think we have the makings for a couple of future NRA members, but maybe, just maybe, they came away with a different point of view.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Here are some pictures from the fireing line:

405801908.jpg


405801904.jpg


405801906.jpg
 
Kudos to you and all in your department for a job well done and for sharing this saga with us. You guys are almost ready for your own reality series!

I guess there's hope for everyone, even the most ardent gun haters.

Again Faulkner, I salute your professionalism, patience and integrity!
 
I just read all of your posts. I just want to say that this is great. It is wonderful to see law enforcement not only engaging the public on both sides of the firearm coin such a positive manner, but in taking the time to go the extra mile to educate people in a non threatening, non domineering matter. Both the Sheriff and yourself are examples of what all Law Enforcement personnel should strive to be.

I would like to personally thank you for your professionalism.
 
I am glad it went so well,
They may never CCW but I would love to be a "Fly on the wall" during the next discussion about guns with their peers

Sometimes even "Liberal Academics" will surprise you. Most often lack of real information or misinformation is the issue.
Once you cleared up their misconceptions and gave them some "Empirical Evidence" they were able to make a good evaluation.

I had an old friend, long since gone, who was probably the most liberal person I knew at the time.

He surprised me with a genuine interest in Firearms

He said "I am an Engineer by trade, we tend to love mechanical things"
 
Last edited:
I too think you and your sheriff handled this situation wonderfully. Thank you for taking the time and having the patience to demonstrate to a couple of non-gun people that all is not what hollyweird makes it to be.

But how do we get the rest of them gun haters to see the light?
 
Now if you could only run a couple 100 mil anti gunners through the same program this country would be better of.

But, its a start, kudos to you for that.

Like the guy who saw a kid walking down the beach picking up star fish and throwing them back in the water.

The man asked, what are you doing, there are hundreds of star fish on the beach, how can throwing one back in the water make a difference.

Kid replies "it makes a difference to that one".
 
Great job! Chances are, they'll start educating some of their friends! Who knows, maybe they've been posting on Facebook to their friends about this whole thing as well, and their friends have seen them come around a little.
 
Apparently, I missed the first two chapters. Whatever they were, this one was well done. The Sheriff sounds like a good guy too. I don't know of any law enforcement agencies in Missouri that teach CCW classes. Maybe they do, and I just don't know it. We should do more of it. Thanks for a job well done.
 
Well, this story is just flat out impressive to say the least. Incredible that you and your dpt made it a point to teach these people.
 
The best thing about the whole story is both you and your Sherriff come across as sensible folk---just like the boys of old were.
My hat is off to you and i would buy the coffee aytime.
Blessings
 
When I first started to read this story in part 1, I took an instant dislike to these 'entitled yuppies'. In my mind, these were two people influenced by the media and the others in their social circle who didn't have a clue but were full of righteous indignation. In reading the last installment of this story, I have to admit I was wrong about them. They kept an open mind and were willing to explore the other side of the coin. I doubt they will be joining the NRA any time soon but thanks to your professionalism, you have planted a seed that may take root. Hopefully, thanks to your efforts, they won't look at gun ownership with fear and trepidation in the future. Well done, sir!
 
Many thanks to you and your department. The three chapters of your story reads like you have done some writing before. What a good thing you have done. Good on you and yours.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top