Condition 1 - cocked and locked - technical question

Anybody up for a seance to check this out with the very late John M. Browning?

I can think of a lot more questions I'd love to ask him.

Maybe I can find out how to carry my Browning High Power.?

It has no grip safety!:eek: and used to have a mag safety. Maybe put the mag safety back in , round in the camber and no magazine?:D
 
A small point - the thumb safety on a 1911 can't be engaged unless it is cocked. Seems strange to be cocking an unloaded pistol just to engage the safety.

Yes, that is so, and we did cock the gun as it made racking the slide faster as resistance was reduced.
 
MY army experience (short as it was ) at Fort Knox in 1975 is that no ammo was issued for the 1911 (or M16) even while on guard duty. Only the MPs were issued live ammo. So I guess condition one was sort of meaningless.

However, if I was in actual battle zone with shooting immediate, I think I would carry with a round chambered and cocked. Thus the purpose of TWO safeties.


Same here; when I was patrolling “The Fence” in Germany back in ‘73 we were not issued any ammo for our 1911’s or our Sheridan’s. I was told that should “they’ decide to come across the fence that our life expectancy was 27 seconds and I wouldn’t need any ammo.
 
Last edited:
After all, this is the same army that still issues bayonets.:rolleyes:

I had a trainee ask me one day if they were going to be issued bayonets. I told him that if he was such a bad shot that if the enemy got close enough that he had to fight him with a sharpened stick, he deserved to die. (I think this was the same trainee who asked me what my first name was and I answered "Sergeant" :D)
 
I remember Ken Hackethorne saying that military pistols, 1911 included, were designed to be carried condition 3. The thumb safety was there only so that you could safely holster the chambered pistol after you had shot a few rounds. After action, the chamber was emptied and returned to condition 3.

The 1911 series 80 type guns, and the titanium firing spring, are safe for condition 1. That’s how I carry my 1911s
 
The 1911 I carried in Nam was carried Condition III as per our training. I entered law enforcement in 1968 and the revolver was king for almost 20 years until we switched to the Glock 23, so my comfort level is with the thirty-eight.
 
To be fair however, let's point out that Glocks and basically all other true striker-fired tupperware guns) simply do NOT have 100% of the energy stored like a cocked 1911 pistol does. Pulling a Glock trigger ADDS energy to the striker before releasing that stored energy, and letting the striker smack the primer.

We may agree that if outdoorsmen or concealed carry citizens walked around with double action revolvers... there would be many an eyebrow raised if the hammer were cocked for single action fire. Sure, no manual thumb safety on the revolver, but the concept of 100% stored energy in that hammer is much like a 1911 -- while nothing like a Glock.

Some how a lot of cops found a way to shoot themselves with a lot of Glocks.

Comparing the manual of arms between DA revolvers and SA 1911s is ridiculous.
 
To be fair however, let's point out that Glocks and basically all other true striker-fired tupperware guns) simply do NOT have 100% of the energy stored like a cocked 1911 pistol does. Pulling a Glock trigger ADDS energy to the striker before releasing that stored energy, and letting the striker smack the primer.

This is true, but how many times have you heard the term "Glock leg" while you seldom hear the term "1911 leg" ?

I feel much more comfortable carrying a cocked and locked 1911 than I do a Glock (or other polymer pistol) that has a light trigger and no safety. The only reason I don't carry my 1911 is because of weight and comfort...my Shield is much more comfortable, and it does have a thumb safety. I have owned polymer, striker fired pistols that seemed to have a lighter trigger pull than a 1911...in fact, I bought a Bersa BP9CC when they first came out, and the trigger pull was scary light...under 2 pounds...and no safety. I traded it back in for that very reason.


We may agree that if outdoorsmen or concealed carry citizens walked around with double action revolvers... there would be many an eyebrow raised if the hammer were cocked for single action fire. Sure, no manual thumb safety on the revolver, but the concept of 100% stored energy in that hammer is much like a 1911 -- while nothing like a Glock.

This is indeed beyond perception. A cocked revolver with no safety is absolutely not safe for carry. My whole point about the cocked and locked 1911 is that it scares people because of how it looks, and not because it's not safe. I think most people who react to a cocked and locked 1911 are simply unaware of how safe it actually is.
 
I have carried in condition 1.
The second time that I found the safety off I quit carrying a 1911.

I would have had the safety worked on...it sounds like it needed an adjustment. It should have a very positive click on and off. Also, while I don't carry mine (because of weight) I do have a holster for it that has a strap that goes underneath the hammer.
 
I would have had the safety worked on...it sounds like it needed an adjustment. It should have a very positive click on and off. Also, while I don't carry mine (because of weight) I do have a holster for it that has a strap that goes underneath the hammer.
When I get a new manual safety gun, I carry it for a day cocked, locked and with an unloaded chamber to ensure that the safety stays engaged.

If it passes the test, I carry it cocked and locked.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Maybe I can find out how to carry my Browning High Power.?

It has no grip safety!:eek: and used to have a mag safety. Maybe put the mag safety back in , round in the camber and no magazine?:D

Better have a seance with Dieudonne Saive. :D
 
MY army experience (short as it was ) at Fort Knox in 1975 is that no ammo was issued for the 1911 (or M16) even while on guard duty. Only the MPs were issued live ammo. So I guess condition one was sort of meaningless.
One day when I was pay officer in a Basic Training Company at Ft. Knox in the '80s, they withdrew all of the .45acp ammo, so there WASN'T any ammunition.

We were given the choice of providing our own ammunition or carrying an M-16A1. I carried my own Series 70 Colt loaded with my own handloads of a 200gr. Hornady CT JSWC over a stout charge of Unique.
 
Let's look to the current advice, and this being the
Smith Forum, I quote from the Smith 1911 manual:

• Do not load the pistol until you are ready to fire. Keep your finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard until you are ready to fire.

So there you have it, don't load the 1911 Smith. And I believe
Colt has the same warning in its 1911 manual.

I think the same warning is given for revolvers.

And I work for Dewey, Cheatham and Howe. :cool:
 
Let's look to the current advice, and this being the Smith Forum, I quote from the Smith 1911 manual:

• Do not load the pistol until you are ready to fire. Keep your finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard until you are ready to fire.
*
Anyone carrying a firearm for serious purposes should be ready to fire.

I did not serve, but everyone I know who served in any branch maintains that the military is so hoplophobic and paranoid that they would rather not have anyone with firearms most of the time. What I have seen from interactions when I was in LE, this is true. They also maintain universally that the training is utterly abysmal compared to what can be gotten from good quality private trainers. This is especially true of those who have left the military and then entered LE. The rare exceptions are those in SOCOM units.

To be fair, the pistol is at most a secondary weapon for most military personnel, and almost no training time is invested in it for the overwhelming majority, including combat arms. Comparing military use and training to that done elsewhere is not close to valid.
 
Back
Top