Mcwsky09
Member
It's a complete myth that reloaders somehow shoot so much that they're spending just as much as before. By next May, the cost of my equipment will be paid for, and I will have a nice stash of ammo to shoot.
You milage may vary - but I don't think that anyone was suggesting that reloading somehow forces you to shoot so much that you spend the same amount of dollars overall.
Saving money per round ENABLES you to have more rounds at your disposal such that if you are inclined and are able to you can either take more rounds per range trip or go to the range more often for the same $. If discretionary funds are not a limiting factor in the number of rounds per trip or number of trips per year for you then saving money per round may not be a factor at all.
The statements made are a reflection of the fact that many people who get into reloading find that regardless of their intentions starting out that in retrospect they spent the same overall amount of their discretionary funds on their hobby/practice/training/etc as they would have if not reloading and along the way go to enjoy shooting more for no overall increase cost.
Then you have the serious hand loaders who tailor a recipe to each individual firearm and range and type of target.
As with many things if you were abel to collect enough data you would expect to find a distribution across a spectrum of reloaders - those who spend less money each year as they did before reloading, those who spend the same, and those who spend more, where the bulk of folks would fall somewhere in the middle of the range.