. . . The Broomhandle with its awkward handling. . . .
Apparently you never owned one.
. . . The Broomhandle with its awkward handling. . . .
The revolver that fires semiauto rounds is not so much of a dead end-think of the S&W M-25 so much an idea that flickers off and on-"They oughta make", then they do-and it doesn't sell. There's the one cylinder for all calibers-have hazy memories of a cylinder firing 9MMP, 38 Super, 9mm Largo (?), moonclips vs a specially designed ejector. Taurus lists their 692 revolver with interchangeable .357/9MMP cylinders.
I think Charter Arms has made revolvers in 9mm that didn't require moonclips but I'm not 100% sure about that.
Would it qualify to throw the HK P7 series in here? Loved at a staggering rate, never copied by anyone and dumped forever ago by HK. These guns raise in price/value every 15 minutes. Even ones with wear command crazy prices and the rare variants are just nutbar in price and they absolutely SELL at the crazy prices.
Maybe nobody would say the design is a "dead end" but also quite complicated... nobody has had any inkling to try and copy them.
I think the Whitney Wolverine should be added to the list. Innovative design and construction materials. Just didn’t do well.
\
My other one I have been thinking of is the Mauser M2. Not for the rotating barrel, but mainly for the positioning of the safety on the rear of the pistol frame! I don't mind it all too much, but it is an odd location for a manual safety if you ask me.
The Browning Hi Power has that in spades as it was the first high capacity semi auto pistol and spawned countless pistols using a double stack magazine. That double column single feed magazine is still state of the art.
Similarly, the Browning linkless delayed recoil locking system is also widely copied and is still found in “modern” pistols. The S&W system is itself a variation on the design.
In terms of the gun itself, the Hi Power was only recently dropped by Browning and is still in production by at least three other companies, so it hasn’t been a dead end even from a configuration perspective.
LVSteve is correct that some shooters with meaty hands who also try to use a modern high grip with it my get bit by the hammer, but those same shooters are also not gripping it as it was designed to be gripped. That could be argued as a “dead end” but it can also be addressed with a slight reshaping of the hammer and or the tang.
So I’m not hating on LVSteve for suggesting the Hi Power as a dead end design, but I am thinking of starting a prayer chain for him as he’s obviously suffered a stroke or head injury in the last couple days.![]()
No head injuries involved, I'm afraid. Maybe I'm just "that guy", but I never bought into the Hi Power mystique from the first time I touched one or got to shoot one. I find the original grips clunky, the BDM is vastly superior it terms of ergos for me, even though it does not look that different. Should have snagged the one I was offered years ago, they are stupid money these days.
Those that complain the HP was made too small so it cannot take 45 ACP make me smile. It's like complaining that Toyota don't have a V8 option on the Corolla.
Of course, you are quite correct in that the HP pioneered the double stack magazine in a handgun and the linkless barrel operation. Both have reappeared in numerous forms ever since, although success can be mixed. I'm looking at you Remington RP9.
The late versions of the 2000 weren’t too bad as the worst problems had been resolved. But by then, the damage to its reputation had already been done, and there were no customers. One of the few handgun designs having a rotating barrel lockup. Colt was just too hasty in bringing it out before it was ready for prime time. But Colt had other more serious problems then.The Colt 2000. A design that put the last nail in the coffin for Colt.
My nomination is the COP.
Heavy, bulky, bad trigger and only 4 shots.
But prices are rising on these in the used market.