When I divorced 13 years ago, I was able to keep all of my firearms because I had a good lawyer and my wife had a female lawyer. This combination worked well. When it came to listing assets, my lawyer told me to list the firearms as a gun collection with a fair dollar value. When her attorney came back with wanting a itemized list, my lawyer sent back, X handguns, Y rifles and Z shotguns. The female attorney demanded an itemized list and my attorney sent back, X1 revolvers, X2 semi-auto handguns, Y1 bolt rifles, Y2 semi-auto rifles, Z1 pump shot guns and Z2 semi-auto shotguns. The value number never changed. By complying with the requests for information and my wife's lawyer not understand firearms, were we able to not provide a detailed listing of each individual firearm so they could never dispute the dollar value I provided. As the trial date approached, my lawyer kept finding other categories into which to place them, i.e. military, commercial, pre-WWII, post-WWII, magazine fed, single shot, etc. He kept giving them information they requested but the information was not really helpful. In the end, she accepted the dollar value I place on the firearms. However, because I kept the house, I did have to write her a check for half of the value of the house which was a considerable amount.