TexasArmed
Member
Absolutely not. If it's not on my person it's locked in the safe. Leaving a firearm unattended, even in a locked vehicle, is negliegent in my opinion.
I do not consider that negligent. If it is it is the owner of the sign that was negligent putting up the sign. When I traveled this month about 70 miles to visit a relative in the hospital, I was not aware that the hospital had a legally enforceable sign. I was compelled to leave the gun in my locked vehicle in order to comply with Texas Law. I maintain that if something happened, it was the hospital's responsibility to prevent a vehicle breakin in their parking lots. While I don't agree that the hospital should put up the legally enforceable signs, if I am a law abiding citisen, I must comply with Texas law. Had I carried it into the hsopital I would have been violating the law. On the other hand, I cannot compel the hospital to change their policy, nor to make an exception just for me. I believe that when a property owner puts up a legal sign at their business, and a customer parks in their lot, and does business with them, should their vehicle be broken into and a weapon removed, from a locked vehicle, then that business including the hospital in this case ought to be liable financially for any resulting criminal activity that mght happen.
The safest place for my gun is on me, but I cannot force the hospital to recognize that. If businesses were held financially responsible for crime on their property it might change their attitude toward CHL. I know at least one doctor who works at St Michael's in Texarkana, who is gun friendly, but he does not own nor run it. Had my vehicle been broken into because of St Michael's policy, I do not consider that it was due to my negligence.
Last edited: