Do you load more older powders or new?

At first I hesitated to mention this. But since others have chimed in, you can all laugh at me and I will smile.

Back in the mid 1960's I bought 3-50 pounds kegs of powder each, in 50 pound waxed fiber material kegs, in Denver, at a very low price compared to today. I still have some that I still use.

The three were H2400, Unique and H4831. I use the first two to load our revolvers and the last to load my .270 rifle. I suspect that all three were perhaps war surplus since I bought them in Gart Brothers Surplus store.

I have reloaded since I was a kid in the early 1940's, I think I started in about 1942. I was in school those years, living on a ranch, and I had an old (very old) Colt .44-40 that was about worn out and a Winchester Model 92, 25.20 cal. The war was on and ammo almost unable to buy so I started reloading.

A good friend who was an engineer with the County Road Department taught me how to reload and supplied me with tools and my first supplies. The following is the truth so laugh all you want.

I started with some old Lyman Tong tools and a Lyman single cavity .44 mold for the Colt. I used scrap plummers lead melted in a pot on the stove in our bunkhouse. I could buy black powder so I used black powder and just filled the cases with powder.I didn't know that powder was to be weighed. I cast the .44 bullets and lubed them with pure bees wax and they worked fine in the old Colt. My friend, who was also a Gunsmith furnished me with primers.

Now here is what you may laugh at.

The .25-20 was a problem for me. So my friend got me a tool (that I still have stored away) from Wilson Machine Company in Oregon (I was living on an Idaho ranch) for the .25-20 rifle.

Here is how it worked. I used fired, empty .22 lr cases, filled the .22 cases with melted lead, then when the lead hardened I put the cases in the bottom part of the iron Wilson tool. The top part of the Wilson tool was then put into the opening of the tool, on top of the mouth of the lead filled .22 case. Then with the tool on top of our shop anvil I hit the tool a good lick with a heavy hammer. This formed the bullet, expanding the .22 case with the lead to .25 caliber with a round nose. In other words it came out of tool as a copper jacketed bullet with a round lead nose. I loaded the bullet into the .25-20 cases on top of all the black powder that would fit under the bullet

Until I enlisted in the USAF in 1949 these two, the Colt and the Winchester, were the guns that I used for everything from Squirells and to Deer and everything in between. I worked as a cowboy most of each year and ran a trapline in the winter, always carrying one or both of my guns.

When I came back from the USAF in 1954 I was flush with my Mustering Out Pay, $250. I had stored the Colt and Winchester when I enlisted in 1949 so I bought a set of Herters tools, I believe it was in 1960, dies and a bench press. I traded the Colt and Winchester for my Remington rifle and Ruger and Smith revolvers. I even bought a Lyman electric furnace and I was able buy out the Linotype Metal from our local newspaper that had converted from a flat bed press to a Goss Rotary. I still have about 50 pounds of that Linotype metal that I use as it is to cast U249421 bullets for our .44's. I did buy a two cavity Lyman mold to cast the bullets. And I still lube them with pure beeswax, loaded without sizing them for our revolvers.

I still use the Herters dies and press but I did buy and use a powder scale to measure the powder for all three caliber guns.

Mostly I load a supply of cartridges over the winter in our ranch shop where it is warm and I have spare time. Usually my wife and I have enough ammo to last until the following winter.

I'm not sorry to tell you this but I don't envy you folks with your more modern equipment. My sons, son-in-law and my Grandsons try to tell me that I am old fashioned since they laugh at the way I load ammo. You can too but I am an old codger who follows the rule, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

I am happy that there is much more modern equipment available for all of you and for my own family though. I guess that I am just too cheap and set to change.
 
When I started reloading in 1967 I used Unique in .45 acp and .45 colt, for .38 special Bullseye was my choice. I've tried lots of different powders over the years and have found Unique & Bullseye still work fine for most of my reloading needs, although I really like Power Pistol for 9mm and .40 s&w.
 
All I use for handguns is Bullseye, Unique, and IMR 4227.
They do everything I need. Why change.
 
I use unique for 45's, bullseye for 38's and 2400 for 357 mag's. I was out of shooting for roughly 25 years or so and all my powder is that old and still works great. I have added H335 for 223's
 
I've moved from Bullseye to Titegroup, Unique to mostly H Universal. For rifle I've moved from H-335 to Ramshot TAC & Exterminator. I don't use as much Reloader 15 & a few others either. I use up my older stock & then start with the new.
 
im kind of a newbie to reloading , i bought a can of bullseye
and reload .38 spec for my 686 4" and for my .357 mag.roller.
i use 3.1 gr behind a 148 gr wadcutter from lyman for the revolver , and 4.5 gr behind a 170 gr semiwadcutter from
lyman for the rolling block [ carbine].
both are very good loads so i see now reason for chance,
but one , it seems that laws over here gonna be somewhat
different and we possibly cant have guns in handgun caliber in the near future , so then i would consider unique .
my thinking is one powder for everything is a bonus !
 
If you're old enough to have been loading when the names of Du Pont and Hercules appeared on powder cans you'll know the powders I still reach for most. I've dabbled in Hodgdon, tried a few cans, of various Winchester powders, and exactly two of Accurate Arms' products.

I've suspected that while some of the propellants introduced within the past quarter of a century are really good, they won't really accomplish much that I haven't already visited with the old tried and true.
 
Probably my go to powder for the 44 Mag, 357 and 45 ACP is HS-6. Great groups, burns clean and meters great. My other "Unique" like powder is Universal. Couple that with 2400 and that rounds out all I need.
 
I think one can make a case for using Trail Boss for mild loads in large cases. It's very bulky which should help achieve consistent velocities but I have never chronographed it.
I do not like Blue Dot. IMHO whey you get to a near top load it goes over pressure with just a small increase in charge.
Several have mentioned Power Pistol and I have been using quite a bit of it in my 9mm's and 40 S&W's.
 
I try a lot of different powders but AA-5, AA-7, Unique & Bullseye are constantly found on my bench.

A friend suggested NO5 because is cleaner and meters netter than Unique. True ?
 
Yes AA5 is cleaner and yes it meters well (it is like fine sand) but I find that it has a wider variation in SD's and tends not to be as accurate with lead as Unique. Hence aa5 is off the bench now for good.
 
I was working on the bench yesterday and noticed that most of my powders that I am using are older. You know the "classics". Bullseye, Unique, 2400 etc. The ones I am burning off and not replacing are the newer powders. Lil-gun, Longshot, etc.

I was seeing that my newest powder I really like is Powder Pistol but it gives some wild flame balls when fired in overcast conditions or early evening. That is behavior that is making me rethink its use.

So I am loading the classics. Bullseye, unique, 2400, the dot powders (Blue, Red and Green), SR4756, and IMR 4227 for revolver, shotgun and most pistol with lead bullets. I am using a bit of Powder Pistol for 9mm, 40 and 10mm.

I have now basically given up on most of the newer "niche" powders like Lil-gun, Longshot, accucomp etc. I just don't see they do that much better than the older ones.

What are you guys doing? "Classics" vs. "Modern"???

Also what is your justification? I am just curious if I am becoming a curmudgeon. :)

Newer is much better. The old saying "if aint broke, don't fix it" is a bunch of hooey. Continuous improvement requires change, and change is good. There are much better powders than the 1st 3 you mentioned. If you choose to use them, fine. But never claim they are "better", because they're not. Times have changed.
 
Newer is much better. The old saying "if aint broke, don't fix it" is a bunch of hooey. Continuous improvement requires change, and change is good. There are much better powders than the 1st 3 you mentioned. If you choose to use them, fine. But never claim they are "better", because they're not. Times have changed.

I don't why "newer is much better". The Alliant line continues the Hercules line and the powders have been tweaked over time. There are many powders that were contemporaries of "The Holy Trinity",i.e., Bullseye, Unique and 2400 that are no longer around. The fact that these are is a testament to their usefulness and popularity.

We're lucky to be living in what might someday be considered the Golden Age of Handloading with all the choices we have.
 
Bullseye for 32ACP & 38 special, tite group for 380, Power pistol for 9x19, unique for 44 spec and 45 ACP

john
 
I happen to like first three. I might agree that there is better powder to be had but "much better" I dont know if I'd agree. What would you consider much better?
Lets define it
38spl hbwc 3.0 of BE
38 spl standard load 4.0 to 5 G of Unique
44 plinking (Id have to look what I make havent made'em in a while) Unique
44mag load? (again need to look it up) but 2400 powder

I also used Red Dot in 38 and 45 acp

I am using red dot to load 12gauge shot shells.

I was using unique to load 28 gauge shot shells, just bought some 20/28 to try out. I supposed to be better, time will tell.

I am always willing to listen and learn, I am not trying to be a jerk.

Discussion is fun for everyone!!


Newer is much better. The old saying "if aint broke, don't fix it" is a bunch of hooey. Continuous improvement requires change, and change is good. There are much better powders than the 1st 3 you mentioned. If you choose to use them, fine. But never claim they are "better", because they're not. Times have changed.
 
I have never had a reloading need that Alliant cant solve. In fact, I can probably narrow that to Bullseye. It's my go to powder for all pistols. It's all I buy nowadays.

Occasionally, I can see a need for Unique. When I reloaded shotshells I used red dot.

Sure , there are other good powders (w231, comes to mind) but.... Why switch? I'm happy
 
Back
Top