DOB, Model 64 Pencil Barrel
- Thread starter Red Tex
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Randy0356
Member
Is it a 1D prefix? if so your gun is 1979-1980 DOB.
Art Doc
SWCA Member, Absent Comrade
Pencil barrel?
Thin barrel?
You're doing this deliberately, aren't you?
1973-74.
Thin barrel?
You're doing this deliberately, aren't you?
1973-74.
Redtex,
I think, could be wrong, that they are all in the @73-74 range. And when looking at the SCSW, look in the D section of serial numbers. You won't find the 64 listed at the top, but you will find the serial numbers.
Munster
I think, could be wrong, that they are all in the @73-74 range. And when looking at the SCSW, look in the D section of serial numbers. You won't find the 64 listed at the top, but you will find the serial numbers.
Munster
sw44spl
Member
I have one you will like it.mine is a great shooting gun.
blairgarber
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 4
Like one of these?
Yes, Blair. That's it exactly. Not in pristine condition like those, but it's still decent. I may go ahead and replace the grips, as they've become darkened and somewhat worn. There is some wear on the finish, but nothing too bad. Functionally, it's excellent.
And thank you all who responded.
And thank you all who responded.
GF
Member
Sax P is back!!!
Ask him about a pencil barreled Combat Target
Masterpiece in 45acp.
He's harmless unless he's hungry.
Ask him about a pencil barreled Combat Target
Masterpiece in 45acp.
He's harmless unless he's hungry.
diamonback68
US Veteran
And the winner is......TN RAT.
Correctamundo.
blairgarber
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 4
Actually the photo is pretty deceptive. I think the top one is 90% at best, and the bottom one is pretty well worn. In fact the bottom one's so holster worn the barrel is burnished bright instead of the factory satin. Frankly, I was fairly amazed at how good they look in this picture! In fact the bottom gun was so crudded up from what must have been years without cleaning (or lubrication as far as I could tell) the action was almost sized. It was obviously a gun that someone thought was maintenance free because it was "stainless". IOW it must have belonged to a cop. Thank God I have a friend with an ultrasonic, or I'd still be cleaning it today. I'm not much for re-finishing stainless guns (other than cleaning) but if I find someone with a blasting set-up I'd re-bead blast the front sights and leave it at that.
/b
blairgarber
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 4
It's the photo, which is slightly out of focus, having been shot through a wide open lens with anti-shake on. The grips aren't original to the guns (one was wearing rubber when I purchased it) but they are right for the period and model. As for the finish I really didn't do much at all except cleaning. They do show wear & handling scratches on close inspection. The bottom gun was carried and has it's share of nicks and scratches but looks good in the photo partly because it's actually polished from holster wear. Under the sideplate that one was a real mess. The action was almost sized and I was worried that it might have rusted solid or something. The only revolver I ever felt that was worse had actually been lubricated with linseed oil!
/b
claygrazer
Member
My 1973 model 64 SN D58xxxx. I got this beauty just a couple of weeks ago with the primo box and matching numbered stocks
Clay
Clay
Bobwtn
Member
Matching box and nice revolver, wow, drooling here in TN. I have a nice clean 64 that many of us do love to refer too as the "pencil barrel" and the heavy one, the "bull barrel", among other pet names. I carried the heavy barrel version a few years as LEO. I sold my 2 inch years ago after leaving the force. I have a Mod. 10 4 inch pencil too. All are great basic guns for range of use. I believe the tapered barrel is a bit easier to conceal or at least for comfort.
Similar threads
- Locked
