Or the fact that when the first turbojet was developed that mankind only had a rudimentary understanding of what materials would be needed to actually produce one! If it wasn't for post war investment, the world would still be flying in planes using technology that was developed in WW1 (i.e. the radial engine)…
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
sounds a bit like a fart in one hand, and a wish in the other.
Might help to stick to known technologies with at least proof of concept prototypes and samples.
while the Jet engine had a pathway forward, as well as turbochargers to base it off of cold fusion did not. the jet engine worked, came into regular use and general acceptance ... cold fusion fell on the floor and faded away as the fraud it was.
There's a lot of stuff we want to believe. whether or not hard reality will support that belief is another matter.
I'll give EV's their cred where it is due. I've embraced it in the RC aircraft hobby. I'm waiting for UPS to drop off an order of new batteries to replace some of those that just won't get it done anymore. That's the inescapable reality.
I'd like to hold out for some of the glass or ceramic substrate types, but the only ones out there are evaluation samples and very hard to find.
even still, I can get cells that can be charged in 30 minutes with ample margin for safety, yet folks are somehow thrilled that the same cells charge over night or longer in a car.
They could fast charge in a half hour too, but it's bottle necked at the power supply, and so few seem to understand that.
even at a technological level that would give us a cell that could be charged in 10 minutes, the power to do it just is not there