Evil men starting riots among us ...

Arthury

Member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
299
Reaction score
7
Location
Washington State
Connecticut lawmaker wants names of gun owners to be made public | Fox News

Evil law-makers are deliberately starting a civil unrest among its own citizens. They are providing a fertile ground for anti-gun protestors to destroy gun-owners' properties and physically harming us through riots and demonstrations by making our addresses public.

And, if any of us pick up a gun to defend ourselves, there'll be more uproar.

How are you guys going to handle this if it comes to your county?
 
Register to hide this ad
Here in Missouri, they'd get tar'ed and feathered.

Seriously though, this is one of those things that needs to work it's way through the courts. The First Amendment guarantees your right to free speech, but you will be held accountable. Just like the Second guarantees our right to bear arms, we are still responsible for our actions.

Just my opinion.
 
A couple counties in NY have released the info, the county I live in has not and our elected officials have stood by us. They've been on just about every news program in America, being defiant. This is a different case though, actually quite the opposite, a local newspaper, not any pols have tried to have the info released.

New York County denies request for names of gun permit holders - Yahoo! News
 
How is possible that elected officials can hate their fellow countrymen this much? The evilness of this act is beyond what words can even describe, it is many notches above the Connecticut massacre. This is politics at all cost: including the deliberate attempt to make your own citizens kill each other. The Obama device is pulled out yet again --- create division among the people.
 
I love how the argument has turned from "nothing bad happens with these databases and registries" to "well it is public information, I need to know who in my neighborhood may have guns!".
 
State Representative Stephen D. Dargan

I just wrote to him via email and gave him a load of it.
Let's flood his mailbox.

Bet he wouldnt like it if the tables were turned & his home address was published from public source information. He'd probably complain like crazy.

I wonder if he owns firearms or has a concealed carry permit. Don't underestimate these guys level of hypocrisy. Its all 'do what we say serfs, not what we do.'
 
Bet he wouldnt like it if the tables were turned & his home address was published from public source information. He'd probably complain like crazy.

I wonder if he owns firearms or has a concealed carry permit. Don't underestimate these guys level of hypocrisy. Its all 'do what we say serfs, not what we do.'

Public domain info :
Stephen Dargan
Home (203) 937-1985
215 Beach St, Unit 1G
West Haven, CT 06516-6131

For those living close to this address, may be several visits to his home will get the message across.
 
Dargan told FoxNews.com on Friday the measure was not intended to pit gun control activists and pro-gun groups against each other.

In actuality, he has just told us exactly what was in his mind!
 
Be respectful. Dont break the law. Dont trespass. Remember you are representatives of those who support the 2A to the US Constitution. Respect the memories of those who gave their lives to defend that Constitution. - - Dress & act accordingly and have in mind your audience of fellow citizens (many who aren't knowledgeable on firearms or the 2A.)

I would think that signs and peaceful protests are still legal in CT.
Good luck to you in CT.
 
Last edited:
At times you need to fight fire with fire. Start publishing the names, addresses and most importantly, salaries, of all officials who support publising the names of gun owners.
Then if they continue, publish the names, addresses and salaries of all of those in the departments that aid and abeit the publishing of names and addresses of gun owners.
Personally, I would start with the department that administers the gun permitting system. I would publish the names, address, salaries of these people. Afterall, they are public servants paid for by your tax dollars.
All of this information is public the same way the names of gun owners is in the public domain.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what 'justification' Dargan has given for this.

What conceivable reason is there to publish the addresses of law abiding citizens who had to pass background checks to get their permits ?

Of course this is nothing but psych-war. In the mind of the broader public, equate legal gun owners to sex offenders who must have their names/addresses published.
 
Last edited:
More incitement of a class warfare situation that has been brewing for years now. Without getting too political, "they" aren't going to be satisfied until "they" have completely divided this country.
 
Walk softly and carry a big stick. Enough is being "said" and not enough is being "done". The entire reason we have these arms is for IF/WHEN we need them......period. The real question is "Where is your line in the sand?"
 
Back
Top