DWalt
Member
Just saw that a $70M F-18 went over the side of the Harry S. Truman because the tow crew lost control. Any carrier squids here who can explain how that could have happened?
And the end of a few Naval careers. Maybe more than a few.Boy, I bet that's a lot of paperwork.
News story said that the F-18 would probably not be salvageable. A towing vehicle also went over the side.Probably gotta send a few charges down there blow it up
"I thought you said YOU set the parking brake!"
She had just come out of SLEP and was homeported at Mayport during work ups for our Med Cruise. This was 82-84. We were assigned to CV-17.AJ, when were you aboard the SARA? When she was at Mayport?
If the ship was taking severe/radical evasive action to avoid a incoming attack, you can't really blame any one group.Like CherryPointMarine posted in Post #2, you gotta be there to understand what happened. Could have been a mistake by the directors, could have been a mistake by the tow tractor driver, could have been the brake rider made a mistake, could have been a mistake by the Blue Shirt (chocks the aircraft) or a combination of any or all of those. The flight Deck is heavily coated with non-skid, but at times it does get slick and things will slide (like aircraft). If the ship rolls to much then things slide easily. Empty weight of an F-18 is 23,000 pounds and loaded (fuel and ordnance up to 52.000 pounds. Can be hard to control with a tow tractor (we used a TA-75 which weighed 10,000 pounds to tow with). Wait until the official report comes out. The media is speculating half the time, or making up what the want to say. Just lucky that no one was killed. The flight deck of a carrier is one of the most dangerous places in the world to work during flight ops. If you have never been there don't make guesses at what happened. I worked the flight deck on USS Saratoga as a "Flight Deck Coordinator" for a couple of years.
That is what a slick deck and rolls to much means. Blame the Houti's or whoever was driving the boat trying to dodge the missiles. Guess they were trying to help out the Sea-Whiz ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx_CIWS ).If the ship was taking severe/radical evasive action to avoid a incoming attack, you can't really blame any one group.
I was aboard the FORESTALL for her '73-'74 work ups and MED cruise out of Mayport. She had just come out of a mini-SLEP. That poor ship was in and out of the yards as often as she was on cruise.She had just come out of SLEP and was homeported at Mayport during work ups for our Med Cruise. This was 82-84. We were assigned to CV-17.
No SLEP anymore, they cut her up for scrap. The last SLEP she went through they screwed the pooch on the superheaters in the boilers and had to come to Mayport to fix them before we left for the cruise. Ended up being a good cruise. We were looking for a war cruise off Beirut (just after the Barracks bombing). Then Reagan pulled out the Marines. Our cruise turned into a "Love Boat" cruise. It was the 40th Anniversary of the landings in France during WW II, so we showed the flag in every port that you can think of, in France, Spain and Italy. Bad part was we still had to get our flight ops accomplished and were flying 30 days worth of flight hours in about a week and a half. Almost forgot, we went down to Libya to see if Omar wanted to come out and play. Did that twice, once by ourselves and once with the USS America.I was aboard the FORESTALL for her '73-'74 work ups and MED cruise out of Mayport. She had just come out of a mini-SLEP. That poor ship was in and out of the yards as often as she was on cruise.
Is that the No.1 Cat?
Bomb them out of the stone age.+1 on the no lives lost and the ship not getting hit by the oncoming attack. I'm sure the retaliation will be swift and effective.
If it isn't, I wouldn't want to see number 1!Is that the No.1 Cat?