Grips for a 642

RJ in Oregon

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Location
Oregon
Well, I picked up a 642 last week and got to shoot it over the weekend. I had a hard time with the stock grips keeping it from rocking up in my hand. I would have to regrip it for each shot. I was wondering if anyone has recomendations for other grips that would help. I am going to be using it as a daily carry gun if that helps as well.

Thanks
RJ
 
Register to hide this ad
I put a set of Crimson Trace grips on my 642. My choice was the extended grips (LG-305). They give me great control (even with +P .38 Specials) but allow excellent concealed carry in my front pocket (using a Mika pocket holster). I am VERY pleased with my CT grips.

Dale53
 
The downside of Crimson Trace grips is the price.

You're looking at $200+.

An internet search for J frame grips will yield a good amount of options. Even try... gulp.. ebay, again searching for J frame grips.

MidwayUSA is where my father got grips for his 642. They sell beefier Hogue grips for around $19. I'd suggest checking them out.

MidwayUSA - Just About Everything in Gun Holsters, Magazines, Grips, & Slings

I wish I could give you a recommendation, but I use the tiny little grips myself.
 

Attachments

  • 642palm.jpg
    642palm.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 94
Have a Look through this thread on the exact topic..
http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1961-1980/78185-search-perfect-grip-j-frame-rb.html
After trying several different grips I ended up going with the Spegel grips that the factory Uncle Mikes were copied from, They work the best for me for concealment & fit my hands good for range use..
Gary/Hk
Craig Spegel Boot Grips J Frame Centennial
940940642.jpg
 
Congrats on the 642! You'll love it!
I know the CT grips I use LG-405 are small but I have no problem "holdin on" but everyones different.

On the price, there is a place in Wasihngton or maybe Montana I think? that sells J-frame Crimson Trace models and they had a Great price when I was looking about 6 mos. ago, they were like $152.00 shipped! atleast at that price you will sell them alot faster if you do not care for them. On that note I would try every place or person you know and try on their J-frame for size. once you find the pair that fits post an ad and chances are that someone here has a pair stashed away, as it seems we have all had a J-frame or two and rubber grips are almost a dime a dozen.

Good luck and enjoy that 642
-2sigs
 
J Frame Grips

I have a set of Hogue J Frame Mono grips that sell for $20.00 Shipped.
 

Attachments

  • HOGUE J Frame.jpg
    HOGUE J Frame.jpg
    84.4 KB · Views: 66
I have a set of Eagle smooth Secret service grips on my 640 and find they handel recoil rather well, as well as being very concealable.
 
The recoils was certainly an issue. I shouldn't have been surprized but went I let loose with a couple 38+p's it was really hard to maintain a grip. I have seen a couple threads where folks have mentioned that they want grips that dont cover the backstrap or go above it. What is the advantage to that, or is it a looks issue? I can see where the steel strap would accent a nice set of grips rather well.
I will check out those you all have recomended.

Thanks again
 
Airweights and Crimson Trace laser grips are a marriage made in heaven. My Airweight is a 637, the visible hammer version of your 642. When I bought it seven years ago, I had the dealer install CT's 305 laser grips (as I now know, I coulda done it myself). At the time, I think the 305 grips were all there was for the Airweight. Now there are three versions, the 105, 305 and 405. My experience is restricted to the 305; the rest of this is a synthesis of what I have read on sites like this. Each CT Airweight grip is radically different from the other two. The 105 (the cheapest) is made of hard plastic and leaves many pinkies wandering around in space. Its major advantages are price and concealability. Its major disadvantages are 1) since an Airweight is light, and since the 105 grips do not cover the backstrap, each shot -- even with range loads -- will get your full attention; and 2) as a grip it is even harder to control than the boot grip that S&W provides with a standard Airweight. The 305 and 405 both cost the same, if memory serves, so their differences are physical. The 305's advantages are that it provides a full hand grip, which makes the Airweight easier to control. Its disadvantages are summarized thus: 1) though not as bad as the 105 version, even range loads are snappy; and 2) because of the full-sized grips 305-equipped Airweights are harder to pocket carry in tight Levis (in my chinos, this is no problem). The 405's main advantage is the "shock absorber" at the top of the backstrap, which soaks up a lot of recoil, which in turn makes it easier to control. The 405's main disadvantage is that it leaves many pinkies wandering around in space. Of the three version, I consider the 105s, though cheapest, to be the least effective. How often would you practice with a handgun that hurts to shoot? As to the other two versions, you know how they differ now. Go fondle them both, and choose the one that feels best in your very own hand.

If you think Crimson Trace laser grips are too expensive, how much are you worth? The entire purpose of an Airweight revolver is self/home defense, most likely in dark or semidark conditions where iron sights can be useless. With laser grips, Airweights really shine. I now expect some flack from those who consider laser grips to be toys for tots.

Cordially, Jack
 
Last edited:
Go to the S&W home page's Online Store and buy the Rubber Grips - J Synthetic Full Size Grip with S&W Logo. I bought a pair two weeks ago and find that they accomodate the pinky and still conceals in a pocket holster.
 
Back
Top