S&W Gun Processing <
[email protected]>
11:38 AM (1 hour ago)
to me
Dear Mr. Rea,
We are contacting you in regards to the firearm you returned to our facility for repair. The evaluation performed by our gunsmiths has determined that your firearm is unrepairable. The frame was damaged and was deemed not covered by warranty process.
Because we value you as a customer we would like to offer you a replacement firearm at a reduced cost, a new Model 442, SKU 150544, would be $357.00 plus any applicable tax and $15.00 shipping.
If you wish to take advantage of the offer please provide me with the name of the FFL dealer (city and state) you would like to use to accept this replacement. The FFL dealer will contact you to pick up the firearm once it is delivered.
**Please note: if there is anything you would like ANY AFTER MARKET GRIPS/SIGHTS returned to you off your firearm, please let me know as when you respond to this email.**
If you do not wish to take advantage of the offer, please let me know as soon as possible and we will return the firearm to you.
Regards,
Gun Processing Department
Sarah M. J. Harrop
Smith and Wesson/Thompson Center
Customer Service
Tel: (800)331-0852 x4042
Fax: (413)747-3317
cid:2C896679-02B1-4591-B929-FA193893D51F
This message, including all attachments: (i) May contain technical data as defined in the International Traffic In Arms Regulations (ITAR) 22 CFR 120.10. Export of this material is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) and may not be exported or transferred to non-U.S. persons without prior written approval from the U.S. Department of State; and (ii) Is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
James J Rea
1:02 PM (0 minutes ago)
to S&W
I'm going to tell you a little story.
My Step Father, James Rhiner who lived in Franklin, Wisconsin at his passing, he was a California Highway Patrolman in the 1960's. He carried a Model 19 and has always been a proponent of your products. A few years before he passed away he bought this 442. Along with an M&P .45 full size with a safety. He also bought an M&P 9mm for his wife, my Mom and the polymer bodyguard revolver for her. All new, in the matter of a couple of years. I was handed down his Model 19 at his passing and I bought the 442 from my Mom because she could use the money. It was nice of her to pass down the Model 19 for no cost to me.
I like your guns. But I have to say that if this is how Smith and Wesson rewards people's business and loyalty, I am not a fan. I have been very active on
www.smith-wessonforum.com and
AR15.Com - Your Firearm Resource. (AR-15, AR-10, M4, M16, AK-47, and More!) and have been a proponent of your products. I even started drawing your guns last year when I was having some health struggles. You can see a few of the drawings here and an article written on The Firearm Blog about drawing them:
POTD: Drawing Smith & Wesson Revolvers For Art Therapy -The Firearm Blog
People are going to hear about your service to me and I am probably going to stop defending your company every time someone bad mouths you guys for having a lock on most of the new guns. Which is a huge issue for people. And my next gun will be a Ruger. I even bought a used 637 to use as my carry gun as I was waiting to see what happens with this one.
First off, if you're not going to cover it, I want mine back. I might try to source a frame and use the parts from this gun.
Secondly, I think it would at least be appropriate for you to replace the frame at no charge. If you're not going to do that I'd think the next best step would be to sell me a frame at a discount and not a whole gun. I can buy a new one at a dealer close to me for not that much more than what you're offering me. It doesn't seem to be like much of a discount. I think the stud pin breaking is an inherent flaw in your design and they should at least use steel studs in the airweights to alleviate that.
So if you're not going to do any of that, just send me my gun back and know you have lost a customer. I believe mine and my Step Dad's loyalty was misplaced. I nearly bought an SP101 before I bought this one from my Mom. Which I think would've been a better move in the long run. I do no regret it because she needed the money.
I had also bought my Step Dad's .45 M&P from her and I have to say it was a very inaccurate gun, in my hands. Compared to pretty much any other auto I have owned and shot. I sold it relatively quickly after acquiring it.
I do not mean to come off as a jerk and I don't want to make you feel personally responsible Sarah. I know you're just the messenger. But maybe you could either make a case for what I'm asking for with your superiors or at the very least communicate my disappointment in their polices and how they've treated this situation. It would be nice if my plea is fruitful and you all decide to do one of the options I've presented. Because I would also like to continue to be a loyal customer. But I will choose to not if this is normal practices for Smith and Wesson. I realize I'm not the original owner but for crying out loud my Step Dad was.
Sincerely,
James J. Rea