Walt Sherrill
Member
I'd argue that the ORIGINAL POSTER is expecting more than is appropriate or reasonable. His gun had been serviced twice (within 2 years -- and could have been serviced or replaced a third time with something that was CLOSE to his original purchase (in terms of size and function if not MSRP). Now, 11 years later, it's still unresolved.
His argument about original MSRP doesn't really enter into it -- guns, nowadays, surprisingly, are cheaper than they were some years ago. The MSRP argument doesn't really apply, since he arguably paid quite a bit more than the typical street price when he bought. And a used gun isn't as valuable as a new one...
Since the original gun is no longer made, and the only metal-framed S&W semi-autos still available from S&W are substantially more expensive and a much different design, I think he is, in effect, asking for a free lunch -- and there are darned few free lunches available, nowadays.
(Then, too, I doubt that the language of the original "lifetime" warranty guaranteed that they'd replace the original weapon with exactly the same weapon... I'm sure he INFERRED that, but the language of most warranties are generally quite ambiguous.)
As others have suggested, I'd say that the OP should have taken the best weapon S&W would offer him, sell it as an AS-NEW-IN-BOX weapon to an interested buyer, and do what he can to get an appropriate replacement (one that meets his "fit" requirements -- if any such weapon still exists). He may choose to never buy S&W again, but he'll be hard-pressed find another gun maker that would have done as much as S&W has already done.
Maybe that new gun will also have a "lifetime" warranty and he'll be able to try that warranty out, too.
His argument about original MSRP doesn't really enter into it -- guns, nowadays, surprisingly, are cheaper than they were some years ago. The MSRP argument doesn't really apply, since he arguably paid quite a bit more than the typical street price when he bought. And a used gun isn't as valuable as a new one...
Since the original gun is no longer made, and the only metal-framed S&W semi-autos still available from S&W are substantially more expensive and a much different design, I think he is, in effect, asking for a free lunch -- and there are darned few free lunches available, nowadays.
(Then, too, I doubt that the language of the original "lifetime" warranty guaranteed that they'd replace the original weapon with exactly the same weapon... I'm sure he INFERRED that, but the language of most warranties are generally quite ambiguous.)
As others have suggested, I'd say that the OP should have taken the best weapon S&W would offer him, sell it as an AS-NEW-IN-BOX weapon to an interested buyer, and do what he can to get an appropriate replacement (one that meets his "fit" requirements -- if any such weapon still exists). He may choose to never buy S&W again, but he'll be hard-pressed find another gun maker that would have done as much as S&W has already done.
Maybe that new gun will also have a "lifetime" warranty and he'll be able to try that warranty out, too.
Last edited: