JCFindley
Member
It is not something often reported by the media unless the situation escalates to the point where deadly force is actually used. My guess is many if not most situations that are de-escalated because of the threat of deadly force do not even get reported.
Have you had such a situation that you are willing to talk about? (Remember the internet might as well be public record so don't incriminate yourself if you think you might be in the wrong legally.)
I would say the vast majority of civilians that legally carry a weapon never need it and that is a good thing IMO. I also think that there are probably some good lessons to be learned from others that have been there.
If you are willing to share tell us what happened. How you reacted. How the situation might have been avoided in the first place if possible. In hindsight, would you have done anything different? Did having a weapon change the scenarios outcome in your opinion and did it in fact save your bacon?
I have had a few over the years I will share in a bit but believe it could be a really interesting subject and perhaps some good lessons to be learned.
Have you had such a situation that you are willing to talk about? (Remember the internet might as well be public record so don't incriminate yourself if you think you might be in the wrong legally.)
I would say the vast majority of civilians that legally carry a weapon never need it and that is a good thing IMO. I also think that there are probably some good lessons to be learned from others that have been there.
If you are willing to share tell us what happened. How you reacted. How the situation might have been avoided in the first place if possible. In hindsight, would you have done anything different? Did having a weapon change the scenarios outcome in your opinion and did it in fact save your bacon?
I have had a few over the years I will share in a bit but believe it could be a really interesting subject and perhaps some good lessons to be learned.