My wife and I are new to shooting. We purchased a 317-3 for her and a MKIII 22/45 for me. The first time shooting with the 317 it jammed - trigger and cylinder would not move. I worked through 100 rounds with some rounds ok, but many of these problems: jamming, or a trigger so hard to pull it took both hands, and most of the time the empties would eject only with great difficulty. Next day at the gun shop it was explained to me that the ammo (CCI mini mags) were expanding and in some cases backing out and causing the problems. Next time we tried Remmington Yellow Jacket HP which had much better success, only one jam, only one or two difficult trigger pulls, but about half the time the shells were difficult to eject but not as bad as the CCIs.
We are disappointed in the gun's performance. Is the problem totally due to the ammo or could it be due to manufacturing tolerances? Is the cylinder aluminum and does that cause a problem?
We are thinking about trading for a model 63. One reason is to hopefully avoid the problems. The 63's frame and cylinder is stainless steel but I assume the action is the same. (maybe it was the luck of the draw that gave us a bad 317, and maybe the luck will be better with another gun) The other reason is that my wife doesn't care for the V sight on the 317 but has fired an SD9 and likes that rear sight better which I believe is the same type as on the 63.
Would welcome feedback on the 317 problems and whether a trade to a model 63 would yield better compatibility with the ammo.
We are disappointed in the gun's performance. Is the problem totally due to the ammo or could it be due to manufacturing tolerances? Is the cylinder aluminum and does that cause a problem?
We are thinking about trading for a model 63. One reason is to hopefully avoid the problems. The 63's frame and cylinder is stainless steel but I assume the action is the same. (maybe it was the luck of the draw that gave us a bad 317, and maybe the luck will be better with another gun) The other reason is that my wife doesn't care for the V sight on the 317 but has fired an SD9 and likes that rear sight better which I believe is the same type as on the 63.
Would welcome feedback on the 317 problems and whether a trade to a model 63 would yield better compatibility with the ammo.